page 203 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section 9. OIL AND GAS FIELD WASTES SORPTION/DESORPTION OF VARIOUS INORGANIC AGENTS ON OIL SHALE Donna M. Cowher, Graduate Research Assistant Gregory D. Boardman, Associate Professor Adil N. Godrej, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 INTRODUCTION Since the "energy crisis" of the early seventies, the United States has been striving to better manage and develop the nation's natural resources of coal, gas and oil. There has also been increased interest in producing synthetic fuels (synfuels) from coal, plants, and other materials containing hydrocarbons. Among these are oil shales, one of the largest and least used fossil fuel resources in the United States. Operations associated with processing shales, however, may create some environmental problems that must be considered before shale oil can be produced commercially. Two of the major waste problems associated with the production of shale oil are the management and disposal of large amounts of spent (or retorted) shale and wastewaters from the retorting processes. It is envisioned that spent shales will be disposed of in an area managed and designed similar to a common landfill. It is therefore imperative that an appreciation for the types and amounts of materials which will elute from the shales be gained. This type of information can then be used to evaluate the hazards associated with the land disposal of shales. Various disposal and reuse alternatives have been suggested in an attempt to alleviate the spent shale disposal problems. Shale might be used as an adsorbent as is activated carbon; e.g., shale might be integrated into a treatment scheme for retort waters. Another suggestion, which is currently under great scrutiny, is to co-dispose spent shale and process waters in a landfill-type disposal system. The process water would serve to moisten the shale, thereby preventing dust problems, and the costs associated with treating process wastewaters would be eliminated. However, under current Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) policy, co-disposal is not permitted. The major concern is that the two separate waste problems might combine to create a more serious problem. Aqueous solutions in most natural systems contain mixtures of many organic and inorganic agents. In a landfill where co-disposal is practiced, shale will come into contact with many solutes, some produced by the leaching of constituents from the shale itself and others introduced by the process waters. Some materials might be adsorbed and/or precipitated, thereby reducing the concern for potential contamination of surface waters or aquifers. On the other hand, solutes in process waters might pass through the shale readily, cause elution of other substances from the shale, or interact with shale constituents to produce even more hazardous substances. There are a number of different scenarios for the sorption/desorption (S/D) of substances which makes it very difficult to predict how solutes alone and in mixtures will behave. The research presented herein was undertaken to provide some insights into the S/D behavior of various inorganic substances on four shales. METHODS AND MATERIALS Both batch and continuous-flow, column trials were performed in this study with four shales obtained from the Department of Energy. The four types of shales considered were: 1) a medium rich raw shale from Anvil Points, Colorado; 2) Oxy 6 spent shale, retorted by Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.; 3) Antrim spent shale (an eastern shale); and 4) Run 16 spent shale (a Colorado shale), retorted at Laramie, Wyoming. 203
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198522 |
Title | Sorption/desorption of various inorganic agents on oil shale |
Author |
Cowher, Donna M. Boardman, Gregory D. Godrej, Adil N. |
Date of Original | 1985 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 40th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,36131 |
Extent of Original | p. 203-212 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-14 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 203 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section 9. OIL AND GAS FIELD WASTES SORPTION/DESORPTION OF VARIOUS INORGANIC AGENTS ON OIL SHALE Donna M. Cowher, Graduate Research Assistant Gregory D. Boardman, Associate Professor Adil N. Godrej, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 INTRODUCTION Since the "energy crisis" of the early seventies, the United States has been striving to better manage and develop the nation's natural resources of coal, gas and oil. There has also been increased interest in producing synthetic fuels (synfuels) from coal, plants, and other materials containing hydrocarbons. Among these are oil shales, one of the largest and least used fossil fuel resources in the United States. Operations associated with processing shales, however, may create some environmental problems that must be considered before shale oil can be produced commercially. Two of the major waste problems associated with the production of shale oil are the management and disposal of large amounts of spent (or retorted) shale and wastewaters from the retorting processes. It is envisioned that spent shales will be disposed of in an area managed and designed similar to a common landfill. It is therefore imperative that an appreciation for the types and amounts of materials which will elute from the shales be gained. This type of information can then be used to evaluate the hazards associated with the land disposal of shales. Various disposal and reuse alternatives have been suggested in an attempt to alleviate the spent shale disposal problems. Shale might be used as an adsorbent as is activated carbon; e.g., shale might be integrated into a treatment scheme for retort waters. Another suggestion, which is currently under great scrutiny, is to co-dispose spent shale and process waters in a landfill-type disposal system. The process water would serve to moisten the shale, thereby preventing dust problems, and the costs associated with treating process wastewaters would be eliminated. However, under current Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) policy, co-disposal is not permitted. The major concern is that the two separate waste problems might combine to create a more serious problem. Aqueous solutions in most natural systems contain mixtures of many organic and inorganic agents. In a landfill where co-disposal is practiced, shale will come into contact with many solutes, some produced by the leaching of constituents from the shale itself and others introduced by the process waters. Some materials might be adsorbed and/or precipitated, thereby reducing the concern for potential contamination of surface waters or aquifers. On the other hand, solutes in process waters might pass through the shale readily, cause elution of other substances from the shale, or interact with shale constituents to produce even more hazardous substances. There are a number of different scenarios for the sorption/desorption (S/D) of substances which makes it very difficult to predict how solutes alone and in mixtures will behave. The research presented herein was undertaken to provide some insights into the S/D behavior of various inorganic substances on four shales. METHODS AND MATERIALS Both batch and continuous-flow, column trials were performed in this study with four shales obtained from the Department of Energy. The four types of shales considered were: 1) a medium rich raw shale from Anvil Points, Colorado; 2) Oxy 6 spent shale, retorted by Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.; 3) Antrim spent shale (an eastern shale); and 4) Run 16 spent shale (a Colorado shale), retorted at Laramie, Wyoming. 203 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 203