page 447 |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
THERMAL DESTRUCTION OF IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. A CASE STUDY IN REGULATORY INTERPRETATION Robert J. Schoenberger, Vice President Michael H. Corbin, Section Manager Roy F. Weston, Inc. West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380 Steven J. Wittmer, Environmental Engineer Alice L. Lenthe, Project Engineer Merck, Sharp, & Dohme West Point, Pennsylvania 19486 INTRODUCTION Since November 1980 when facilities which disposed of treated hazardous waste or stored hazardous waste were required to obtain interim status permits, the regulatory requirements have been under continual interpretation and change. Some objectives of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are to: 1) control environmental impact; and 2) to reduce the quantity of hazardous wastes requiring land disposal. These objectives must be kept in perspective when reviewing the management options available for treatment or disposal. Beginning in 1982 many existing industries and commercial hazardous waste facilities have been undergoing final permitting for their hazardous waste facilities under RCRA Part B requirements. This permitting process is quite complex and requires careful front-end planning to control future constraints and complications which arise during the permitting process. One objective often pursued internally at an industry is to minimize the number of facilities which are permitted and to structure the permit in a manner which does not place unacceptable constraints and restrictions on the operation of these facilities. This paper discusses a case history to obtain a RCRA Part B Permit for a facility which thermally destructs ignitable hazardous waste on-site. The Part B Permit application was prepared for the Merck, Sharp and Dohme facility, West Point, Pennsylvania. This manufacturing facility is a combination of pharmaceutical production and research activity. Mainly because of the research, some quantities of a wide variety of hazardous waste are generated. To accommodate the full scope of hazardous waste management, the Part B includes not only thermal destruction but also the requisite storage and bulking facilities. The industry, like many others nationwide, is proposing to utilize an existing thermal processing device for the destruction of a major portion of their hazardous waste. The RCRA classification of hazardous waste is based upon the potential human health and environmental interactions given in Table I. Through mid 1984 characteristics have been developed for only the first four hazardous characteristics in Table I. As with many companies, the subject of the case history generated other aqueous and solid wastes which were not ignitable by either characteristics or by listing. The thermal approach was selected because it accomplishes a complete destruction of the waste material, yet provides an opportunity for recovery of the energy value from these wastes. BACKGROUND The pharmaceutical firm of Merck, Sharp and Dohme Division of Merck Company, Inc. (MSD) is located in West Point, Pennsylvania, approximately 40 miles north of Philadelphia. At its 315- acre site the company manufactures and packages pharmaceutical formulations, veterinary products, and biologicals, and also is engaged in extensive research activity. Hazardous wastes are generated as by-products of manufacturing and maintenance activities and as a result of research activity. 447
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198446 |
Title | Thermal destruction of ignitable hazardous waste : a case study in regulatory interpretation |
Author |
Schoenberger, Robert J. Corbin, Michael H. Wittmer, Steven J. Lenthe, Alice L. |
Date of Original | 1984 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 39th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,35769 |
Extent of Original | p. 447-452 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-16 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 447 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | THERMAL DESTRUCTION OF IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. A CASE STUDY IN REGULATORY INTERPRETATION Robert J. Schoenberger, Vice President Michael H. Corbin, Section Manager Roy F. Weston, Inc. West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380 Steven J. Wittmer, Environmental Engineer Alice L. Lenthe, Project Engineer Merck, Sharp, & Dohme West Point, Pennsylvania 19486 INTRODUCTION Since November 1980 when facilities which disposed of treated hazardous waste or stored hazardous waste were required to obtain interim status permits, the regulatory requirements have been under continual interpretation and change. Some objectives of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are to: 1) control environmental impact; and 2) to reduce the quantity of hazardous wastes requiring land disposal. These objectives must be kept in perspective when reviewing the management options available for treatment or disposal. Beginning in 1982 many existing industries and commercial hazardous waste facilities have been undergoing final permitting for their hazardous waste facilities under RCRA Part B requirements. This permitting process is quite complex and requires careful front-end planning to control future constraints and complications which arise during the permitting process. One objective often pursued internally at an industry is to minimize the number of facilities which are permitted and to structure the permit in a manner which does not place unacceptable constraints and restrictions on the operation of these facilities. This paper discusses a case history to obtain a RCRA Part B Permit for a facility which thermally destructs ignitable hazardous waste on-site. The Part B Permit application was prepared for the Merck, Sharp and Dohme facility, West Point, Pennsylvania. This manufacturing facility is a combination of pharmaceutical production and research activity. Mainly because of the research, some quantities of a wide variety of hazardous waste are generated. To accommodate the full scope of hazardous waste management, the Part B includes not only thermal destruction but also the requisite storage and bulking facilities. The industry, like many others nationwide, is proposing to utilize an existing thermal processing device for the destruction of a major portion of their hazardous waste. The RCRA classification of hazardous waste is based upon the potential human health and environmental interactions given in Table I. Through mid 1984 characteristics have been developed for only the first four hazardous characteristics in Table I. As with many companies, the subject of the case history generated other aqueous and solid wastes which were not ignitable by either characteristics or by listing. The thermal approach was selected because it accomplishes a complete destruction of the waste material, yet provides an opportunity for recovery of the energy value from these wastes. BACKGROUND The pharmaceutical firm of Merck, Sharp and Dohme Division of Merck Company, Inc. (MSD) is located in West Point, Pennsylvania, approximately 40 miles north of Philadelphia. At its 315- acre site the company manufactures and packages pharmaceutical formulations, veterinary products, and biologicals, and also is engaged in extensive research activity. Hazardous wastes are generated as by-products of manufacturing and maintenance activities and as a result of research activity. 447 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 447