page 397 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
POZZOLANIC MICROENCAPSULATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ASSURANCE Charles L. Smith, Principal Researcher Conversion Systems, Inc. Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044 Kent E. Zenobia. Senior Environmental Engineer Envirosafe Services, Inc. Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044 Industrial wastes as an environmental problem have been widely discussed. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified over 40 million tons of chemical industry waste produced annually as hazardous. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 began what promises to be a long and tedious battle to achieve proper destruction or disposal for these wastes. There is as yet an uncertainty in the mechanism of RCRA, causing many to be concerned over what destruction or disposal methods are adequate now, and will remain adequate into the future. A long list can be compiled of events paralleling Love Canal or the Valley of the Drums [1). Yet, many of these disposal inadequacies that may now be considered criminal were adequate when initially carried out. Those responsible for waste disposal are keenly aware of the environmental and financial effects of these tragedies. WHOSE LIBIALITY? The generator of hazardous wastes has two basic options: (1) to take the responsibility for disposal on his own shoulders, using a company-owned facility; or (2) to hand the disposal task to a professional disposal service. Neither decision removes the burden of responsibility from the shoulders of the generator. Existing legislation clearly establishes liability for disposal mishaps that occur directly under the control of a generator. Aside from a company responsibility for generating the waste, even pollution engineers in the employ of that company, in the opinion of several attorneys, have personal liability: "Any person who may have taken part at any time in a private discussion where the outcome was to ignore a possible situation, like properly disposing of hazardous waste, is liable" [21. "Anyone who withholds information about a dangerous situation is liable" [21. The generator disposing of his own hazardous waste must also maintain substantial insurance covering sudden and accidental pollution liability [3). Use of a disposal service is no remedy for the potential liabilities involved in hazardous waste disposal. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) any company that arranges for the disposal of hazardous wastes is liable if those wastes are not disposed of properly 14 [. In addition, the stigma of liability extends to all persons who transported waste to the disposal site and, of course, to the operator of the disposal site [ 5). CONSIDERING THE RISK For the majority of industrial wastes, it has been concluded that a secure landfill is the appropriate answer, whether by the generator or by a disposal service. The primary function 397
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198245 |
Title | Pozzolanic microencapsulation for environmental quality assurance |
Author |
Smith, Charles L. Zenobia, Kent E. |
Date of Original | 1982 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 37th Industrial Waste Conference |
Extent of Original | p. 397-404 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-14 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 397 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | POZZOLANIC MICROENCAPSULATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ASSURANCE Charles L. Smith, Principal Researcher Conversion Systems, Inc. Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044 Kent E. Zenobia. Senior Environmental Engineer Envirosafe Services, Inc. Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044 Industrial wastes as an environmental problem have been widely discussed. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified over 40 million tons of chemical industry waste produced annually as hazardous. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 began what promises to be a long and tedious battle to achieve proper destruction or disposal for these wastes. There is as yet an uncertainty in the mechanism of RCRA, causing many to be concerned over what destruction or disposal methods are adequate now, and will remain adequate into the future. A long list can be compiled of events paralleling Love Canal or the Valley of the Drums [1). Yet, many of these disposal inadequacies that may now be considered criminal were adequate when initially carried out. Those responsible for waste disposal are keenly aware of the environmental and financial effects of these tragedies. WHOSE LIBIALITY? The generator of hazardous wastes has two basic options: (1) to take the responsibility for disposal on his own shoulders, using a company-owned facility; or (2) to hand the disposal task to a professional disposal service. Neither decision removes the burden of responsibility from the shoulders of the generator. Existing legislation clearly establishes liability for disposal mishaps that occur directly under the control of a generator. Aside from a company responsibility for generating the waste, even pollution engineers in the employ of that company, in the opinion of several attorneys, have personal liability: "Any person who may have taken part at any time in a private discussion where the outcome was to ignore a possible situation, like properly disposing of hazardous waste, is liable" [21. "Anyone who withholds information about a dangerous situation is liable" [21. The generator disposing of his own hazardous waste must also maintain substantial insurance covering sudden and accidental pollution liability [3). Use of a disposal service is no remedy for the potential liabilities involved in hazardous waste disposal. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) any company that arranges for the disposal of hazardous wastes is liable if those wastes are not disposed of properly 14 [. In addition, the stigma of liability extends to all persons who transported waste to the disposal site and, of course, to the operator of the disposal site [ 5). CONSIDERING THE RISK For the majority of industrial wastes, it has been concluded that a secure landfill is the appropriate answer, whether by the generator or by a disposal service. The primary function 397 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 397