page 564 |
Previous | 1 of 9 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
INEXPENSIVE HEAVY METAL REMOVAL BY FOAM FLOTATION Gregory Mclntyre, Research Assistant Juan J. Rodriguez, Research Assistant Edward L. Thackston, Professor David J. Wilson, Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee 37235 A prime concern of the environmental engineer at the present time is the removal of small concentrations of toxic substances from industrial wastewaters. Heavy metals are of prime importance because the new pretreatment standards require dischargers to limit heavy metals to very low residual concentrations, and the Environmental Protection Agency estimates the metal-plating industry to be one of the industries hardest hit by the pretreatment standards. Existing methods of heavy metal removal, such as lime precipitation, require large tanks and space requirements, produce a wet, bulky sludge, and have long settling times. In order to meet the 1984 BAT Regulations, polishing filters will probably also be required. This will increase the cost even more. Adsorbing colloid foam flotation as a way to remove heavy metals has been under investigation at Vanderbilt University for some years now. The process involves the addition of a coagulant, usually ferric chloride or alum, to form a floe (usually positively charged). The dissolved heavy metal is then adsorbed onto the floe particle and/or coprecipitated with it. The addition of a surfactant of opposite charge, such as sodium lauryl sulfate (NLS), then renders the floe particle hydrophobic and the floe (with adsorbed metal) is removed by air flotation which produces rising bubbles of surfactant, with attached floe. When dealing with dilute wastes, this process possesses some distinct advantages-low effluent metal concentrations, rapid operation, low space requirements, production of small volumes of sludge, flexibility of application to various metals at various scales, and, above all, low cost. The work described in this paper involves the removal of copper and zinc, and mixtures of copper and zinc, and chromium. The pilot plant studies have shown that effluent cop- per(ll) concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 mg/1 and zinc levels around 0.5 mg/1 can be routinely obtained under optimum conditions. For experiments done with a simulated electroplating waste stream containing 20 mg/1 each of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cr(IU), effluents were produced which contained concentrations of Cu(II) less than 0.1 mg/l;Zn(H) less than 0.5 mg/1; and Cr(IH) less than 0.2 mg/1. Earlier work involving a simulated lead waste was reported at the 35th Annual Purdue Industrial Waste Conference [1] and in the WPCF Journal [2]. Wilson and Clark (3) also published a lengthy summary review of adsorbing colloid foam flotation in 1978. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION The foam flotation pilot plant used in this work has been described in detail in earlier papers [ 1,2]. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the plant. 564
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198161 |
Title | Inexpensive heavy metal removal by foam flotation |
Author |
McIntyre, Gregory Rodriguez, Juan J. Thackston, Edward L. Wilson, David J. |
Date of Original | 1981 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 36th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,32118 |
Extent of Original | p. 564-572 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-07 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 564 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | INEXPENSIVE HEAVY METAL REMOVAL BY FOAM FLOTATION Gregory Mclntyre, Research Assistant Juan J. Rodriguez, Research Assistant Edward L. Thackston, Professor David J. Wilson, Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee 37235 A prime concern of the environmental engineer at the present time is the removal of small concentrations of toxic substances from industrial wastewaters. Heavy metals are of prime importance because the new pretreatment standards require dischargers to limit heavy metals to very low residual concentrations, and the Environmental Protection Agency estimates the metal-plating industry to be one of the industries hardest hit by the pretreatment standards. Existing methods of heavy metal removal, such as lime precipitation, require large tanks and space requirements, produce a wet, bulky sludge, and have long settling times. In order to meet the 1984 BAT Regulations, polishing filters will probably also be required. This will increase the cost even more. Adsorbing colloid foam flotation as a way to remove heavy metals has been under investigation at Vanderbilt University for some years now. The process involves the addition of a coagulant, usually ferric chloride or alum, to form a floe (usually positively charged). The dissolved heavy metal is then adsorbed onto the floe particle and/or coprecipitated with it. The addition of a surfactant of opposite charge, such as sodium lauryl sulfate (NLS), then renders the floe particle hydrophobic and the floe (with adsorbed metal) is removed by air flotation which produces rising bubbles of surfactant, with attached floe. When dealing with dilute wastes, this process possesses some distinct advantages-low effluent metal concentrations, rapid operation, low space requirements, production of small volumes of sludge, flexibility of application to various metals at various scales, and, above all, low cost. The work described in this paper involves the removal of copper and zinc, and mixtures of copper and zinc, and chromium. The pilot plant studies have shown that effluent cop- per(ll) concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 mg/1 and zinc levels around 0.5 mg/1 can be routinely obtained under optimum conditions. For experiments done with a simulated electroplating waste stream containing 20 mg/1 each of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cr(IU), effluents were produced which contained concentrations of Cu(II) less than 0.1 mg/l;Zn(H) less than 0.5 mg/1; and Cr(IH) less than 0.2 mg/1. Earlier work involving a simulated lead waste was reported at the 35th Annual Purdue Industrial Waste Conference [1] and in the WPCF Journal [2]. Wilson and Clark (3) also published a lengthy summary review of adsorbing colloid foam flotation in 1978. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION The foam flotation pilot plant used in this work has been described in detail in earlier papers [ 1,2]. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the plant. 564 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 564