page 195 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
OILY WASTEWATER CONTAMINATION OF THE WATER TABLE AT A WOOD PRESERVING PLANT John Ball, Professor Civil Engineering Department The University of Alabama University, Alabama 35486 This chapter presents a case study of the closing of a small process pond at a wood preserving plant. The purpose of closing the pond was to move the plant to a different location; however, the company would have closed the pond in any case because of the new hazardous waste regulations. During the closing operation, it was found that preservative had reached the water table. This chapter outlines what was done to determine the extent of the problem, how it probably occurred and the final solution that was approved by the state. THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS The wood treating plant is a small part of the company business, which is the design and fabrication of electrical substations. Some of the materials used in substations are wooden cross arms and braces, which must be treated with a chemical preservative. The lumber for the cross arms and braces is shipped to the plant from the West Coast and is a relatively high- quality raw material that has been dried prior to treating. The company treats the lumber with the preservative pentachlorophenol (PCP) at a certain stage in the fabrication of a substation. PCP is not injected into the wood in full strength but as a 5-7% dilution in an oil carrier such as No. 2 fuel oil. Some quantities of wastewater are generated in the process that carry low concentrations of the preservative solution. Unlike most wood treating plants, there is no "steaming out" or boiling-in-oil cycle at this plant. The operation is unusually clean, with the tram cars being loaded and unloaded inside a building with the single, small (6- x 50-ft) cylinder located outside. Water is contaminated in three ways. The first is a washwater that is generated once each week. The operating crew wash down the inside of the cylinder with a fire hose to keep from building up tars and wood chips in the cylinder. This water runs out of the front of the cylinder to a sump. The second source is contaminated rainwater that falls in the door sump and within the boundaries of the plant. Since the ground has been contaminated with preservative from pipe and pump leaks, this water is collected for treatment. Washwater and contaminated rainwater is piped to the barometric water pond. The barometric system is the greatest source of contaminated water. Like many older plants, this plant uses an eductor to produce the vacuum for the cylinder. Steam and water are added to the top of the eductor (Figure 1), and a vacuum is pulled on the cylinder that results in vaporizing some of the preservative and carrier oil. Any vaporized products are condensed in the eductor and contaminate the pond. Because of the size of the operation, the barometric cooling water pond was only about 30 by 60 by 5 ft deep. A recycle pump supplied the water to the eductor and a fresh water line added makeup to the pond during dry spells. Sprays had been installed in the pond to aid evaporating storm water. POLLUTION CONTROL The immediate plant area was diked to direct storm water to the barometric pond. This also was a part of the spill control plan should a tank leak or a line rupture. There was a 195
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198120 |
Title | Oily wastewater contamination of the water table at a wood preserving plant |
Author |
Ball, John (John E.) |
Date of Original | 1981 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 36th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,32118 |
Extent of Original | p. 195-202 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-07 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 195 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | OILY WASTEWATER CONTAMINATION OF THE WATER TABLE AT A WOOD PRESERVING PLANT John Ball, Professor Civil Engineering Department The University of Alabama University, Alabama 35486 This chapter presents a case study of the closing of a small process pond at a wood preserving plant. The purpose of closing the pond was to move the plant to a different location; however, the company would have closed the pond in any case because of the new hazardous waste regulations. During the closing operation, it was found that preservative had reached the water table. This chapter outlines what was done to determine the extent of the problem, how it probably occurred and the final solution that was approved by the state. THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS The wood treating plant is a small part of the company business, which is the design and fabrication of electrical substations. Some of the materials used in substations are wooden cross arms and braces, which must be treated with a chemical preservative. The lumber for the cross arms and braces is shipped to the plant from the West Coast and is a relatively high- quality raw material that has been dried prior to treating. The company treats the lumber with the preservative pentachlorophenol (PCP) at a certain stage in the fabrication of a substation. PCP is not injected into the wood in full strength but as a 5-7% dilution in an oil carrier such as No. 2 fuel oil. Some quantities of wastewater are generated in the process that carry low concentrations of the preservative solution. Unlike most wood treating plants, there is no "steaming out" or boiling-in-oil cycle at this plant. The operation is unusually clean, with the tram cars being loaded and unloaded inside a building with the single, small (6- x 50-ft) cylinder located outside. Water is contaminated in three ways. The first is a washwater that is generated once each week. The operating crew wash down the inside of the cylinder with a fire hose to keep from building up tars and wood chips in the cylinder. This water runs out of the front of the cylinder to a sump. The second source is contaminated rainwater that falls in the door sump and within the boundaries of the plant. Since the ground has been contaminated with preservative from pipe and pump leaks, this water is collected for treatment. Washwater and contaminated rainwater is piped to the barometric water pond. The barometric system is the greatest source of contaminated water. Like many older plants, this plant uses an eductor to produce the vacuum for the cylinder. Steam and water are added to the top of the eductor (Figure 1), and a vacuum is pulled on the cylinder that results in vaporizing some of the preservative and carrier oil. Any vaporized products are condensed in the eductor and contaminate the pond. Because of the size of the operation, the barometric cooling water pond was only about 30 by 60 by 5 ft deep. A recycle pump supplied the water to the eductor and a fresh water line added makeup to the pond during dry spells. Sprays had been installed in the pond to aid evaporating storm water. POLLUTION CONTROL The immediate plant area was diked to direct storm water to the barometric pond. This also was a part of the spill control plan should a tank leak or a line rupture. There was a 195 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 195