page 183 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT STANDARDS FOR TOXIC POLLUTANTS Murray P. Strier, Chemical Engineer James D. Gallup, Chief Office of Quality Review U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 On the original list of 129 priority pollutants singled out in the 1977 Clean Water Act Amendments, there were 96 nonpesticide single and groups of organic compounds. There was at best, very little information available on the treatability for removal from industrial wastewater of singular organic compounds by unit processes and systems. Up until then, organic pollutants were assessed by generic pollutant parameters such as BOD, COD, TOC and TSS. Although structure-activity correlations have had universal application in other fields, it appeared to not been used in any depth in pollution control of toxic organics. This article is on the efforts to date by the authors, with special emphasis on the application to development of treatability-based effluent guidelines limitations. In essence, this served as a supplemental study to the overall broad program by EPA to develop regulations for priority pollutants based on extensive industrial waste surveys of 21 primary industrial categories. Table I is a summary of our original data set, which served to establish our six designated clusters on estimated ranges of theoretical effluent limitations, called ETEL values [1, 2]. Such physical-chemical properties as molecular weight, boiling point, azeotropic boiling Point, composition and solubility, were used initially. However, compound functionality and end-use application rounded out our judgment as well [ 1 ]. Compounds used as substitutes in end-uses are bound to have comparable intrinsic characteristics. In the discussion which follows, an effort is made to show how our rationale can be used to serve as a scientific, cost-effective basis for setting effluent guidelines limitations, analyzing treatability data and for possible intelligent use of generic pollutant parameters, as surrogates for certain broad classes of toxic organic pollutant compounds [3]. FUNDAMENTAL THERMODYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS In our study, the five unit treatment processes given in Table II were selected on the basis that they were already in use or would be expected to be used in the near future in treatment systems for the removal of organic priority pollutants from industrial wastewater [ 1 ]. Included are key physical-chemical parameters which were deemed relevant and most of which can be considered as amenable to correlation with chemical structure. For the most Part, especially in its early stages, our correlations applied either to single comounds in water, or else, in relatively clean industrial wastewater matrices. For all of the five treatment options, solubility plays a dominant role, even when biochemical oxidation is concerned, as will now be discussed. Applying the Gibbs free energy relationship, AG°, for the distribution of a solute between two media, e.g., octanol-1 and water, as is the case for the partition coefficient, at equilibrium, AG° =-RT/na2/ai - -KP (1) 183
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198119 |
Title | Industrial effluent standards for toxic pollutants |
Author |
Strier, Murray P. Gallup, James D. |
Date of Original | 1981 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 36th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,32118 |
Extent of Original | p. 183-194 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-07 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 183 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT STANDARDS FOR TOXIC POLLUTANTS Murray P. Strier, Chemical Engineer James D. Gallup, Chief Office of Quality Review U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 On the original list of 129 priority pollutants singled out in the 1977 Clean Water Act Amendments, there were 96 nonpesticide single and groups of organic compounds. There was at best, very little information available on the treatability for removal from industrial wastewater of singular organic compounds by unit processes and systems. Up until then, organic pollutants were assessed by generic pollutant parameters such as BOD, COD, TOC and TSS. Although structure-activity correlations have had universal application in other fields, it appeared to not been used in any depth in pollution control of toxic organics. This article is on the efforts to date by the authors, with special emphasis on the application to development of treatability-based effluent guidelines limitations. In essence, this served as a supplemental study to the overall broad program by EPA to develop regulations for priority pollutants based on extensive industrial waste surveys of 21 primary industrial categories. Table I is a summary of our original data set, which served to establish our six designated clusters on estimated ranges of theoretical effluent limitations, called ETEL values [1, 2]. Such physical-chemical properties as molecular weight, boiling point, azeotropic boiling Point, composition and solubility, were used initially. However, compound functionality and end-use application rounded out our judgment as well [ 1 ]. Compounds used as substitutes in end-uses are bound to have comparable intrinsic characteristics. In the discussion which follows, an effort is made to show how our rationale can be used to serve as a scientific, cost-effective basis for setting effluent guidelines limitations, analyzing treatability data and for possible intelligent use of generic pollutant parameters, as surrogates for certain broad classes of toxic organic pollutant compounds [3]. FUNDAMENTAL THERMODYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS In our study, the five unit treatment processes given in Table II were selected on the basis that they were already in use or would be expected to be used in the near future in treatment systems for the removal of organic priority pollutants from industrial wastewater [ 1 ]. Included are key physical-chemical parameters which were deemed relevant and most of which can be considered as amenable to correlation with chemical structure. For the most Part, especially in its early stages, our correlations applied either to single comounds in water, or else, in relatively clean industrial wastewater matrices. For all of the five treatment options, solubility plays a dominant role, even when biochemical oxidation is concerned, as will now be discussed. Applying the Gibbs free energy relationship, AG°, for the distribution of a solute between two media, e.g., octanol-1 and water, as is the case for the partition coefficient, at equilibrium, AG° =-RT/na2/ai - -KP (1) 183 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 183