page 855 |
Previous | 1 of 11 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
FIELD PERFORMANCE OF THREE RBC AERATION MODES TREATING INDUSTRIAL WASTES Charles Chi-Su Chou, Manager New Products Development Robert J. Hynek, Manager Process Verification and Pilot Plant Program Autotrol Corporation Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209 Present rotating biological contactor (RBC) processes and equipment have evolved to a considerably higher degree of understanding, application and mechanical design from the original concept of rotating flat wooden, metal or polystyrene discs for wastewater treatment or mass transfer of gases to liquids. This evolution from the turn of the century to 1980 followed an event curve similar to many other technologies in which the most rapid advances occurred in the latter 25% of the time span. In this case, RBC advances in equipment took the form of changing to more economical and cost effective high density polyethylene media with an internal honeycomb structure of greater surface area density. From a process application standpoint, RBC wastewater treatment has advanced from only BOD removal to nitrification, in combination or alone, and to nutrient removal and denitrification [ 1 ]. In addition, significant process and operational advantages have been gained by the utilization of aeration within the liquid to increase specific BOD removal rates. This latter development not only resulted in a revolutionary method of rotation [21, it also resulted in a unique method for upgrading existing activated sludge plants at a minimum cost [3] . This new development eventually extended to a detailed study which confirmed the cost effectiveness of providing supplemental aeration under existing mechanically driven RBC equipment [4]. This paper will discuss application of the three modes of RBC aeration at installations treating beef and poultry processing, dairy and refinery wastewaters. BIO-SURF TREATMENT OF BEEF AND FOWL PROCESSING WASTE Wastewater Characteristics The wastewater treatment plant of Gibbon, Nebraska receives a combination of beef slaughtering waste, turkey processing waste and community sewage. The treatment plant serves a population of only 1,500 and the major waste load (94% of BOD loading, 75% of hydraulic loading) is from the industrial section. Normally, the meat packing company slaughters 500 head of cattle per day and discharges 200,000-300,000 gpd after pretreatment by skimming and sedimentation. The turkey plant operates 8-10 months a year and contributes as much as 550,000 gpd of waste flow [51 ; however, its waste strength is lower than the beef slaughtering waste. Pretreatment The beef plant has a basic pretreatment system, a flow-through settling tank where a skimmer removes grease before the effluent goes to the combined treatment plant. The poultry plant pretreats its waste with a set of screens and microstrainer, followed by primary settling. Both of the industrial streams are monitored regularly and the monthly average results from March, 1979 to February, 1980 are summarized in Table I and Figure 1. 855
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198085 |
Title | Field performance of three RBC aeration modes treating industrial wastes |
Author |
Chou, Charles Chi-Su Hynek, Robert J. |
Date of Original | 1980 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 35th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,31542 |
Extent of Original | p. 855-865 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 855 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | FIELD PERFORMANCE OF THREE RBC AERATION MODES TREATING INDUSTRIAL WASTES Charles Chi-Su Chou, Manager New Products Development Robert J. Hynek, Manager Process Verification and Pilot Plant Program Autotrol Corporation Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209 Present rotating biological contactor (RBC) processes and equipment have evolved to a considerably higher degree of understanding, application and mechanical design from the original concept of rotating flat wooden, metal or polystyrene discs for wastewater treatment or mass transfer of gases to liquids. This evolution from the turn of the century to 1980 followed an event curve similar to many other technologies in which the most rapid advances occurred in the latter 25% of the time span. In this case, RBC advances in equipment took the form of changing to more economical and cost effective high density polyethylene media with an internal honeycomb structure of greater surface area density. From a process application standpoint, RBC wastewater treatment has advanced from only BOD removal to nitrification, in combination or alone, and to nutrient removal and denitrification [ 1 ]. In addition, significant process and operational advantages have been gained by the utilization of aeration within the liquid to increase specific BOD removal rates. This latter development not only resulted in a revolutionary method of rotation [21, it also resulted in a unique method for upgrading existing activated sludge plants at a minimum cost [3] . This new development eventually extended to a detailed study which confirmed the cost effectiveness of providing supplemental aeration under existing mechanically driven RBC equipment [4]. This paper will discuss application of the three modes of RBC aeration at installations treating beef and poultry processing, dairy and refinery wastewaters. BIO-SURF TREATMENT OF BEEF AND FOWL PROCESSING WASTE Wastewater Characteristics The wastewater treatment plant of Gibbon, Nebraska receives a combination of beef slaughtering waste, turkey processing waste and community sewage. The treatment plant serves a population of only 1,500 and the major waste load (94% of BOD loading, 75% of hydraulic loading) is from the industrial section. Normally, the meat packing company slaughters 500 head of cattle per day and discharges 200,000-300,000 gpd after pretreatment by skimming and sedimentation. The turkey plant operates 8-10 months a year and contributes as much as 550,000 gpd of waste flow [51 ; however, its waste strength is lower than the beef slaughtering waste. Pretreatment The beef plant has a basic pretreatment system, a flow-through settling tank where a skimmer removes grease before the effluent goes to the combined treatment plant. The poultry plant pretreats its waste with a set of screens and microstrainer, followed by primary settling. Both of the industrial streams are monitored regularly and the monthly average results from March, 1979 to February, 1980 are summarized in Table I and Figure 1. 855 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 855