page 373 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
MUTAGENICITY AND TOXICITY OF TREATED AQUEOUS EFFLUENTS FROM COAL CONVERSION PROCESSES J.I. Brand, Development Engineer J.A. Klein, Group Leader Chemical Technology Division B.R. Parkhurst, Research Associate Environmental Sciences Division T.K. Rao, Research Associate Biology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 INTRODUCTION The task of developing rational treatment systems for complex and varying wastewaters from coal conversion processes necessarily must reflect both technical and regulatory considerations. These wastewaters are highly variable, both between conversion processes and for differing operating conditions within the same process. These wastes are also sufficiently complex and different from the more common industrial and municipal wastes to necessitate modification of standard wastewater analytical techniques [1]. FinaUy, the anticipated discharge standards to be met are only tentative. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), experimental treatment of a variety of these wastes has been successful in cleaning these waters so that anticipated regulations for the discharge of conventional poUutants such as total organic carbon (TOC) and phenols are met. However, since these wastes are known to be unusual, meeting standards designed for conventional industrial wastes does not necessarily ensure that the hazardous nature of these wastes is adequately reduced, nor does it ensure that some unexpected hazards are not introduced as artifacts of the treatment scheme. In addition, in any waste, the presence or absence of specific chemical species may not indicate the biological activity of the waste. Thus, specific wastewaters were selected for exploratory studies of their biological impact, as measured in a laboratory setting by short-term mutagenicity and acute toxicity assays. These bioassays were performed on the wastes before and after treatment, as weU as at selected intermediate points within treatment schemes typical of those which have been purposed for coal conversion waste treatment. WhUe biological tests of this nature are often more complicated and time consuming than simple chemical assays, the information obtained can be quite valuable in the development and evaluation of treatment processes. EQUIPMENT Bench-scale facdities at ORNL for the treatment of aqueous effluents from coal conversion processes include a number of individual unit operations which can be operated in a variety of configurations and combinations depending on the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific waste being treated. The current configuration is shown schematicaUy in Figure 1. The major components of the system are the primary treatment, performed in the stripping column, secondary treatment performed in the biological oxidation units and polishing, which is intended to remove refractory organics, performed in the ozonation and the sorption systems. If ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were present, the wastes were stripped using a nominal 2-in. (5-cm) diameter column fdled with 1/2-in. (1.3- cm) Berl saddles with a total packing depth of 1.2 meters. This column could be used for either air or steam stripping. Biological oxidation of phenolics has been extensively studied at ORNL in both fluidized beds and continuously stirred activated sludge tanks [2-4]. In this study, the fluidized bed reactors had an active bed volume of 2.5 liters; the activated sludge tanks had a nominal volume of 3 liters. Either type of reactor could be operated in paraUel or in series with others of the same type and could be operated in either batch or continuous modes. 373
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198035 |
Title | Mutagenicity and toxicity of treated aqueous effluents from coal conversion processes |
Author |
Brand, J. J. Klein, J. A. Parkhurst, B. R. Rao, T. K. |
Date of Original | 1980 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 35th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,31542 |
Extent of Original | p. 373-380 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 373 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | MUTAGENICITY AND TOXICITY OF TREATED AQUEOUS EFFLUENTS FROM COAL CONVERSION PROCESSES J.I. Brand, Development Engineer J.A. Klein, Group Leader Chemical Technology Division B.R. Parkhurst, Research Associate Environmental Sciences Division T.K. Rao, Research Associate Biology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 INTRODUCTION The task of developing rational treatment systems for complex and varying wastewaters from coal conversion processes necessarily must reflect both technical and regulatory considerations. These wastewaters are highly variable, both between conversion processes and for differing operating conditions within the same process. These wastes are also sufficiently complex and different from the more common industrial and municipal wastes to necessitate modification of standard wastewater analytical techniques [1]. FinaUy, the anticipated discharge standards to be met are only tentative. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), experimental treatment of a variety of these wastes has been successful in cleaning these waters so that anticipated regulations for the discharge of conventional poUutants such as total organic carbon (TOC) and phenols are met. However, since these wastes are known to be unusual, meeting standards designed for conventional industrial wastes does not necessarily ensure that the hazardous nature of these wastes is adequately reduced, nor does it ensure that some unexpected hazards are not introduced as artifacts of the treatment scheme. In addition, in any waste, the presence or absence of specific chemical species may not indicate the biological activity of the waste. Thus, specific wastewaters were selected for exploratory studies of their biological impact, as measured in a laboratory setting by short-term mutagenicity and acute toxicity assays. These bioassays were performed on the wastes before and after treatment, as weU as at selected intermediate points within treatment schemes typical of those which have been purposed for coal conversion waste treatment. WhUe biological tests of this nature are often more complicated and time consuming than simple chemical assays, the information obtained can be quite valuable in the development and evaluation of treatment processes. EQUIPMENT Bench-scale facdities at ORNL for the treatment of aqueous effluents from coal conversion processes include a number of individual unit operations which can be operated in a variety of configurations and combinations depending on the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific waste being treated. The current configuration is shown schematicaUy in Figure 1. The major components of the system are the primary treatment, performed in the stripping column, secondary treatment performed in the biological oxidation units and polishing, which is intended to remove refractory organics, performed in the ozonation and the sorption systems. If ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were present, the wastes were stripped using a nominal 2-in. (5-cm) diameter column fdled with 1/2-in. (1.3- cm) Berl saddles with a total packing depth of 1.2 meters. This column could be used for either air or steam stripping. Biological oxidation of phenolics has been extensively studied at ORNL in both fluidized beds and continuously stirred activated sludge tanks [2-4]. In this study, the fluidized bed reactors had an active bed volume of 2.5 liters; the activated sludge tanks had a nominal volume of 3 liters. Either type of reactor could be operated in paraUel or in series with others of the same type and could be operated in either batch or continuous modes. 373 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 373