page 522 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
THIOCYANATE BIO-OXIDATION KINETICS Ronald D. Neufeld, Associate Professor Lorraine Matson, Graduate Student Patricia Lubon, Graduate Student Department of Civil Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261 INTRODUCTION Effluents from coking, coal gasification, and other coal carbonization processes often contain high levels of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), phenolics, thiocyanates, free and fixed ammonia, cyanides, sulfides, sulfates, and alkalinity. Chemical analysis of such effluents varies from process to process due to differing conditions of coal carbonization, gas scrubbing temperatures, and type of coal feedstock used. In a coal gasification facility, ground coal, which may be pretreated to destroy its agglomerating properties, is fed to a gasifier where it reacts with steam and oxygen. Bed temperatures and product gas composition may be varied within limits by the steam-to-coal and oxygen-to-coal ratios employed. In fixed bed and some fluidized bed gasifiers, much of the coal carbon is converted to CO, C02, and CH4, however, a small fraction amounting to 4 to 6% of the feed carbon, appears as liquid effluent tars and potential water pollutants from the scrubbed product gas [ 1 ]. Little is known of the formation of thiocyanate (SCN) during gasification. Luthy [2] indicates that one possible gas phase mechanism for the formation of aqueous thiocyanate is the reaction of carbon disulfide and ammonia. In the coking industry, the formation of thiocyanate can be explained on the basis of oxidation of coke oven gas constituents through various complex reactions in the aqueous phase to form thiocyanate and thiocyanate complexes. As indicated by Luthy, such reactions may involved the complexation of aqueous polysulfides and thiosulfates with cyanide. Similar aqueous phase reactions are thought to also exist with coal conversion liquid effluents. Pollutant production data for four different coal gasification processes is given in Table I as a function of coal feed type on a pound produced per pound coal gasified, moisture- and ash-free (MAF) basis. Table I indicates the quantity of thiocyanate produced per ton of coal gasified can vary from about 0.07 to 2.5 lb SCN/ton coal MAF. The quantity of wastewater production is directly related to the degree of steam decomposition in the gasifier and moisture content of the coal. By using the data in Table I and assuming that approximately one pound of wastewater is produced per pound of coal (MAF) gasified, then the expected effluent thiocyanate concentration will range between 35 to 1250 mg/1 [11. Research has been underway at the University of Pittsburgh to investigate certain key aspects of control technology development associated with coal conversion facilities. The purpose of this chapter is to report on some research efforts involving the biodegradation of thiocyanate (SCN) as found in soeme coal conversion and coke plant wastewaters. Klein et al. [3] have indicated that the most probable technologies for coal conversion aqueous waste treatment include ozonation, adsorption, biological degradation, solvent extraction, membrane processes, and coagulation-flocculation. In the specific area of thio- cyanate/cyanide removal, investigated processes include ozonation, adsorption, biological degradation, and chlorination. Chlorination has been the traditional approach to thiocyanate and cyanide removal in the metal plating industry where the end products are first cyanate and then carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas. This approach however is not applicable to coal conversion processes due 522
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198051 |
Title | Thiocyanate bio-oxidation kinetics |
Author |
Neufeld, Ronald D. Matson, Lorraine Lubon, Patricia |
Date of Original | 1980 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 35th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,31542 |
Extent of Original | p. 522-533 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 522 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | THIOCYANATE BIO-OXIDATION KINETICS Ronald D. Neufeld, Associate Professor Lorraine Matson, Graduate Student Patricia Lubon, Graduate Student Department of Civil Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261 INTRODUCTION Effluents from coking, coal gasification, and other coal carbonization processes often contain high levels of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), phenolics, thiocyanates, free and fixed ammonia, cyanides, sulfides, sulfates, and alkalinity. Chemical analysis of such effluents varies from process to process due to differing conditions of coal carbonization, gas scrubbing temperatures, and type of coal feedstock used. In a coal gasification facility, ground coal, which may be pretreated to destroy its agglomerating properties, is fed to a gasifier where it reacts with steam and oxygen. Bed temperatures and product gas composition may be varied within limits by the steam-to-coal and oxygen-to-coal ratios employed. In fixed bed and some fluidized bed gasifiers, much of the coal carbon is converted to CO, C02, and CH4, however, a small fraction amounting to 4 to 6% of the feed carbon, appears as liquid effluent tars and potential water pollutants from the scrubbed product gas [ 1 ]. Little is known of the formation of thiocyanate (SCN) during gasification. Luthy [2] indicates that one possible gas phase mechanism for the formation of aqueous thiocyanate is the reaction of carbon disulfide and ammonia. In the coking industry, the formation of thiocyanate can be explained on the basis of oxidation of coke oven gas constituents through various complex reactions in the aqueous phase to form thiocyanate and thiocyanate complexes. As indicated by Luthy, such reactions may involved the complexation of aqueous polysulfides and thiosulfates with cyanide. Similar aqueous phase reactions are thought to also exist with coal conversion liquid effluents. Pollutant production data for four different coal gasification processes is given in Table I as a function of coal feed type on a pound produced per pound coal gasified, moisture- and ash-free (MAF) basis. Table I indicates the quantity of thiocyanate produced per ton of coal gasified can vary from about 0.07 to 2.5 lb SCN/ton coal MAF. The quantity of wastewater production is directly related to the degree of steam decomposition in the gasifier and moisture content of the coal. By using the data in Table I and assuming that approximately one pound of wastewater is produced per pound of coal (MAF) gasified, then the expected effluent thiocyanate concentration will range between 35 to 1250 mg/1 [11. Research has been underway at the University of Pittsburgh to investigate certain key aspects of control technology development associated with coal conversion facilities. The purpose of this chapter is to report on some research efforts involving the biodegradation of thiocyanate (SCN) as found in soeme coal conversion and coke plant wastewaters. Klein et al. [3] have indicated that the most probable technologies for coal conversion aqueous waste treatment include ozonation, adsorption, biological degradation, solvent extraction, membrane processes, and coagulation-flocculation. In the specific area of thio- cyanate/cyanide removal, investigated processes include ozonation, adsorption, biological degradation, and chlorination. Chlorination has been the traditional approach to thiocyanate and cyanide removal in the metal plating industry where the end products are first cyanate and then carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas. This approach however is not applicable to coal conversion processes due 522 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 522