page 354 |
Previous | 1 of 19 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM FOR COKE PLANT WASTEWATER ACHIEVING COMPLETE NITRIFICATION A. Bhattacharyya, Donner-Hanna Coke Joint Venture Buffalo, New York A.C. Middleton, Koppers Company, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania INTRODUCTION Coke plant wastewaters generate mainly from coke oven gas cleaning and by-product recovery process steps. They contain varying levels of ammonia, phenols, sulfide, thiosulfate, thiocyanate, cyanide, chloride and many other compounds. Effluent limitations guideUnes, for discharge of coke plant effluents to navigable waters, are expected to be based on Best Avadable Technology Economically Achievable (BATEA). Several possible alternate routes have been proposed as BATEA with low required effluent Umits in view. BasicaUy they can be divided into two groups: (a) physico-chemical; and (b) biological. Physico-chemical processes conventionally consist of solvent extraction for phenol removal, lime or caustic distdlation for ammonia removal, alkaline chlorination for ammonia and cyanide removal and a few others. More recently activated carbon is also being used. Physico-chemical processes, properly conceptualized and designed, are capable of achieving high purification efficiency at a high operational reliabdity. NormaUy, however, they are associated with high operating costs. Biological treatment, on the other hand, is considered as a cost effective process provided the feasibdity study indicates the compatibdity of the waste to biological degradation. A literature review on research and operating experiences of pdot plant and full-scale treatment systems indicated consistent nitrification of coke plant waste waters has not been widely demonstrated. It is the objective of the paper to describe a bench-scale treatabdity study that achieved consistent reliable nitrification. BACKGROUND The Donner-Hanna Coke Plant, Buffalo, New York, operates three batteries totaUing 151 ovens. Batches of crushed, specially blended coals are carbonized in these ovens producing as much as 3000 tons of coke per day. Volatile organic matter and moisture from coal leave the ovens during carbonization and are taken through the by-product recovery system to produce raw ammonia liquor, tar, ammonium sulfate, light oils and coke oven gas. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the Donner-Hanna coking process with by-product recovery systems. The primary component is the coke battery where carbonization of coal takes place. The coal blend is "charged" in measured amounts to individual ovens and is "pushed" as coke at the end of a coking cycle of the oven. A "hot car" carries this coke to a quenching station where it is cooled by water sprays. Evaporation takes place in the quenching tower and the remainder of the sprayed water flows to a settling basin where particles settle out and are removed periodically. The clarified water is mixed with required make-up water and is recycled to the quench tower. Crude gas, consisting of the products of destructive distillation of coal and moisture, are withdrawn from the ovens through individual stand pipes connected to the coUecting main. This crude gas is cooled by sprayed recirculated raw ammoniacal Uquor called "flushing Uquor." CooUng is effected mainly by adiabatic evaporation of water in flushing liquor and the temperature of gas goes down to about 100 C. Up to about 2000 gallons of flushing liquor are used per ton of coal carbonized. Most of the tar is condensed out of gas in the collecting main, and the flushing liquor dissolves almost all of the "fixed ammonia" and some "free ammonia" from the gas. The raw ammonia liquor and tar, separated from gas, go 354
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198034 |
Title | Enhanced biological treatment system for coke plant wastewater achieving complete nitrification |
Author |
Bhattacharyya, A. Middleton, A. C. |
Date of Original | 1980 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 35th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,31542 |
Extent of Original | p. 354-372 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 354 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM FOR COKE PLANT WASTEWATER ACHIEVING COMPLETE NITRIFICATION A. Bhattacharyya, Donner-Hanna Coke Joint Venture Buffalo, New York A.C. Middleton, Koppers Company, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania INTRODUCTION Coke plant wastewaters generate mainly from coke oven gas cleaning and by-product recovery process steps. They contain varying levels of ammonia, phenols, sulfide, thiosulfate, thiocyanate, cyanide, chloride and many other compounds. Effluent limitations guideUnes, for discharge of coke plant effluents to navigable waters, are expected to be based on Best Avadable Technology Economically Achievable (BATEA). Several possible alternate routes have been proposed as BATEA with low required effluent Umits in view. BasicaUy they can be divided into two groups: (a) physico-chemical; and (b) biological. Physico-chemical processes conventionally consist of solvent extraction for phenol removal, lime or caustic distdlation for ammonia removal, alkaline chlorination for ammonia and cyanide removal and a few others. More recently activated carbon is also being used. Physico-chemical processes, properly conceptualized and designed, are capable of achieving high purification efficiency at a high operational reliabdity. NormaUy, however, they are associated with high operating costs. Biological treatment, on the other hand, is considered as a cost effective process provided the feasibdity study indicates the compatibdity of the waste to biological degradation. A literature review on research and operating experiences of pdot plant and full-scale treatment systems indicated consistent nitrification of coke plant waste waters has not been widely demonstrated. It is the objective of the paper to describe a bench-scale treatabdity study that achieved consistent reliable nitrification. BACKGROUND The Donner-Hanna Coke Plant, Buffalo, New York, operates three batteries totaUing 151 ovens. Batches of crushed, specially blended coals are carbonized in these ovens producing as much as 3000 tons of coke per day. Volatile organic matter and moisture from coal leave the ovens during carbonization and are taken through the by-product recovery system to produce raw ammonia liquor, tar, ammonium sulfate, light oils and coke oven gas. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the Donner-Hanna coking process with by-product recovery systems. The primary component is the coke battery where carbonization of coal takes place. The coal blend is "charged" in measured amounts to individual ovens and is "pushed" as coke at the end of a coking cycle of the oven. A "hot car" carries this coke to a quenching station where it is cooled by water sprays. Evaporation takes place in the quenching tower and the remainder of the sprayed water flows to a settling basin where particles settle out and are removed periodically. The clarified water is mixed with required make-up water and is recycled to the quench tower. Crude gas, consisting of the products of destructive distillation of coal and moisture, are withdrawn from the ovens through individual stand pipes connected to the coUecting main. This crude gas is cooled by sprayed recirculated raw ammoniacal Uquor called "flushing Uquor." CooUng is effected mainly by adiabatic evaporation of water in flushing liquor and the temperature of gas goes down to about 100 C. Up to about 2000 gallons of flushing liquor are used per ton of coal carbonized. Most of the tar is condensed out of gas in the collecting main, and the flushing liquor dissolves almost all of the "fixed ammonia" and some "free ammonia" from the gas. The raw ammonia liquor and tar, separated from gas, go 354 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 354