page0829 |
Previous | 1 of 9 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR CONTROL OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS C. W. Stuewe, Group Manager J. G. Geary, Project Engineer Hydroscience, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee 37919 H. M. Thron, Jr., Staff Chemical Engineer Office of Water Enforcement U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 INTRODUCTION The Federal Water PoUution Control Act of 1972 as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977 has as its cornerstone the poUcy of controUing poUution at its source. To implement this pohcy, EPA relies heavdy on the National Podutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. Any owner or operator of a facility that discharges to waters of the U.S. must have an NPDES permit to comply with the legal requirements of the Clean Water Act [ 1 ]. The NPDES permit program has been relatively successful in controUing the major sources of conventional water poUution in the nation by imposing effluent limitations in permits, normaUy dady mass load limits, on poUutant characteristics such as BOD, COD, TSS and pH, and on certain heavy metals. As we enter the second or post-1977 phase of NPDES permits issuance-most permits were issued in 1973-74 with an effective life of 5 years—it is essential to adopt a more comprehensive approach to poUution control efforts by emphasizing the control of the toxic poUutants. It is toward this goal of total plant-site control of toxic and hazardous poUutants that best management practices (BMP) are directed. Congress authorized EPA to develop BMP for industrial dischargers in section 304(e) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 [2]. Before industrial BMP are discussed in detad, it should be understood that the concept of BMP for water poUution abatement is not new. The following examples of BMP used by the EPA dlustrate the usefulness of this qualitative or procedural approach to water poUution abatement: Dredge and Fid Program-In this program the agency uses BMP to prevent or minimize the environmental consequences of discharging dredged or fill materials into streams, lakes, wetlands or other water bodies. These BMP are procedures or practices to minimize changes in stream or current flow, to prevent increases in sediment loads and the introduction of chemicals into our waterways. Areawide Waste Treatment Management (208) Program—Here the EPA uses BMP to define measures for controUing nonpoint sources of poUution, e.g., agriculture, silviculture and mining activities. Urban Stormwater Runoff Program—The agency uses BMP in this program to minimize the adverse impacts on water quality of runoff from urban areas through a source control program stressing the reduction or prevention of runoff poUution. The central theme of urban runoff control is to minimize poUution reaching the coUection system or receiving water by using BMP. Flow attenuation-increasing the time of concentration and decreasing the magnitude of the peak runoff-is the basis for many of the urban stormwater management BMP. National PoUutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Permit Program-The most recent application of the BMP approach to abate poUution is the use of BMP in the NPDES program, with the aim of preventing or minimizing the release of toxic or hazardous substances to the surface waters from ancdlary industrial sources. Several general characteristics of BMP are noteworthy. First, they frequently are procedural and suggest methods or practices to accomplish certain goals. Second, they normally are 829
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197983 |
Title | Best management practices for control of toxic and hazardous materials |
Author |
Stuewe, C. W. Cleary, J. G. Thron, H. M. |
Date of Original | 1979 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 34th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,30453 |
Extent of Original | p. 829-837 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University LIbraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page0829 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR CONTROL OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS C. W. Stuewe, Group Manager J. G. Geary, Project Engineer Hydroscience, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee 37919 H. M. Thron, Jr., Staff Chemical Engineer Office of Water Enforcement U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 INTRODUCTION The Federal Water PoUution Control Act of 1972 as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977 has as its cornerstone the poUcy of controUing poUution at its source. To implement this pohcy, EPA relies heavdy on the National Podutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. Any owner or operator of a facility that discharges to waters of the U.S. must have an NPDES permit to comply with the legal requirements of the Clean Water Act [ 1 ]. The NPDES permit program has been relatively successful in controUing the major sources of conventional water poUution in the nation by imposing effluent limitations in permits, normaUy dady mass load limits, on poUutant characteristics such as BOD, COD, TSS and pH, and on certain heavy metals. As we enter the second or post-1977 phase of NPDES permits issuance-most permits were issued in 1973-74 with an effective life of 5 years—it is essential to adopt a more comprehensive approach to poUution control efforts by emphasizing the control of the toxic poUutants. It is toward this goal of total plant-site control of toxic and hazardous poUutants that best management practices (BMP) are directed. Congress authorized EPA to develop BMP for industrial dischargers in section 304(e) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 [2]. Before industrial BMP are discussed in detad, it should be understood that the concept of BMP for water poUution abatement is not new. The following examples of BMP used by the EPA dlustrate the usefulness of this qualitative or procedural approach to water poUution abatement: Dredge and Fid Program-In this program the agency uses BMP to prevent or minimize the environmental consequences of discharging dredged or fill materials into streams, lakes, wetlands or other water bodies. These BMP are procedures or practices to minimize changes in stream or current flow, to prevent increases in sediment loads and the introduction of chemicals into our waterways. Areawide Waste Treatment Management (208) Program—Here the EPA uses BMP to define measures for controUing nonpoint sources of poUution, e.g., agriculture, silviculture and mining activities. Urban Stormwater Runoff Program—The agency uses BMP in this program to minimize the adverse impacts on water quality of runoff from urban areas through a source control program stressing the reduction or prevention of runoff poUution. The central theme of urban runoff control is to minimize poUution reaching the coUection system or receiving water by using BMP. Flow attenuation-increasing the time of concentration and decreasing the magnitude of the peak runoff-is the basis for many of the urban stormwater management BMP. National PoUutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Permit Program-The most recent application of the BMP approach to abate poUution is the use of BMP in the NPDES program, with the aim of preventing or minimizing the release of toxic or hazardous substances to the surface waters from ancdlary industrial sources. Several general characteristics of BMP are noteworthy. First, they frequently are procedural and suggest methods or practices to accomplish certain goals. Second, they normally are 829 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page0829