page0556 |
Previous | 1 of 9 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section 7. MINING WASTES MODIFICATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PONDS Charles R. Jenkins, Professor Department of Civil Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 James F. Pankanin, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois 60604 INTRODUCTION Sediment ponds are constructed at surface mine sites to prevent undesirable deposition of silt, sediment and other detritus in any area outside the active mining site. Prior to 1978 in West Virginia, a sediment pond was required to have a minimum capacity to store 0.125 ac-ft per acre of disturbed area (3048 m3 /ha) in the watershed [ 1 ]. The sediment pond was to be cleaned out when the sediment accumulation approached 60% of the design capacity. An Environmental Protection Agency report stated that sediment control ponds as then designed and constructed were only marginally effective in reducing suspended solids discharge [2]. Proposed rules for regulating the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 were published in the Federal Register in September, 1978 [3]. These rules require ponds to have a sediment storage volume equal to the accumulated sediment volume from the drainage area to the pond for a minimum of three years or 0.1 ac-ft per acre (2438 m3/ha) of disturbed area in the watershed. The ponds shall also provide a 24-hr detention time for the runoff entering the pond from a 10-yr, 24-hr precipitation event. Regulatory authority may in some instances reduce these requirements slightly. Sediment shall be removed when the volume accumulates to 60% of the required sediment storage. Effluent limitations are shown in Table I. Table I. Effluent Limitations Average of Daily Values for Characteristics Maximum Allowable 30 Consecutive Discharge Days Iron, Total (mg/l) 7.0 3.5 Manganese, Total (mg/l) 4.0 2.0 Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 70.0 35.0 pH (within range) 6.0-9.0 Sediment ponds work by reducing the velocity of water so that gravitational settling will clear the water before discharging into receiving streams. Short-circuiting across the pond will result in a decreased detention time and a lower quality effluent. This is a common problem of sediment ponds. This study was designed to (1) evaluate the operational efficiency of two similar surface mine sediment ponds during storm flows; (2) consider, build, and install modifications for each pond; and (3) evaluate performance during storm flows with the modifications installed to determine the effectiveness of the various modifications. 556
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197955 |
Title | Modification of sediment control ponds |
Author |
Jenkins, Charles R. Pankanin, James F. |
Date of Original | 1979 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 34th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,30453 |
Extent of Original | p. 556-564 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page0556 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section 7. MINING WASTES MODIFICATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PONDS Charles R. Jenkins, Professor Department of Civil Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 James F. Pankanin, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois 60604 INTRODUCTION Sediment ponds are constructed at surface mine sites to prevent undesirable deposition of silt, sediment and other detritus in any area outside the active mining site. Prior to 1978 in West Virginia, a sediment pond was required to have a minimum capacity to store 0.125 ac-ft per acre of disturbed area (3048 m3 /ha) in the watershed [ 1 ]. The sediment pond was to be cleaned out when the sediment accumulation approached 60% of the design capacity. An Environmental Protection Agency report stated that sediment control ponds as then designed and constructed were only marginally effective in reducing suspended solids discharge [2]. Proposed rules for regulating the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 were published in the Federal Register in September, 1978 [3]. These rules require ponds to have a sediment storage volume equal to the accumulated sediment volume from the drainage area to the pond for a minimum of three years or 0.1 ac-ft per acre (2438 m3/ha) of disturbed area in the watershed. The ponds shall also provide a 24-hr detention time for the runoff entering the pond from a 10-yr, 24-hr precipitation event. Regulatory authority may in some instances reduce these requirements slightly. Sediment shall be removed when the volume accumulates to 60% of the required sediment storage. Effluent limitations are shown in Table I. Table I. Effluent Limitations Average of Daily Values for Characteristics Maximum Allowable 30 Consecutive Discharge Days Iron, Total (mg/l) 7.0 3.5 Manganese, Total (mg/l) 4.0 2.0 Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 70.0 35.0 pH (within range) 6.0-9.0 Sediment ponds work by reducing the velocity of water so that gravitational settling will clear the water before discharging into receiving streams. Short-circuiting across the pond will result in a decreased detention time and a lower quality effluent. This is a common problem of sediment ponds. This study was designed to (1) evaluate the operational efficiency of two similar surface mine sediment ponds during storm flows; (2) consider, build, and install modifications for each pond; and (3) evaluate performance during storm flows with the modifications installed to determine the effectiveness of the various modifications. 556 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page0556