page 474 |
Previous | 1 of 7 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Milk Losses john w. rugaber, District Engineer Pet Milk Company Greenville, Tennessee Fifty years ago, yes, even 20 years or less ago, it was not uncommon for local business men and farmers to invite milk plants to locate in certain areas and freely offer streams for cooling water supply and waste disposal as incentives for locating at a particular town. These same facilities were offered to numerous other industries as well, with the result that streams, in many cases, became overloaded with wastes and now the problem is, what to do about it? Frequently the statement is made that some industry is finding profit in processing their waste. Often, comments are made suggesting the dairy industry should do the same. Some branches of the industry have been fortunate enough to find by-products which will at least pay for their manufacturing cost. This is primarily true in production of cheese and butter. Approximate production figures indicate that there was 120 billion pounds of milk produced in 1951. Of this amount, about 24 per cent was used in butter production and 9 per cent for cheese. Most dairy wastes are collected in the floor drains and are diluted by the time they reach a point where they can be collected in any volume. This contamination and dilution of the milk makes by-product utilization impractical by known methods for most of the industry. With the possibility of by-products eliminated it is necessary to consider the disposal of wastes by other methods. Until recent years, there seemed to be a tendency to design disposal plants according to existing sewer loads and these high loadings combined with expensive types of plant designs made the cost for disposal plants almost prohibitive. After working in various milk plants, visiting numerous other milk plants, and discussing the problem with men in disposal plant occupations, it was concluded that: When taking up the matter of waste disposal, one must take up the matter of waste reduction at the same time, or preferably before even determining the magnitude of the disposal problem. It seems as though the natural reaction of the average man when faced with a problem is to work on overcoming the effect rather than isolating and combating the basic cause. The original milk loss is the basic cause of the disposal problem and a fight 474
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC195245 |
Title | Milk losses |
Author | Rugaber, John W. |
Date of Original | 1952 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the seventh Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=2072&REC=12 |
Extent of Original | p. 474-480 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2008-09-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 474 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Milk Losses john w. rugaber, District Engineer Pet Milk Company Greenville, Tennessee Fifty years ago, yes, even 20 years or less ago, it was not uncommon for local business men and farmers to invite milk plants to locate in certain areas and freely offer streams for cooling water supply and waste disposal as incentives for locating at a particular town. These same facilities were offered to numerous other industries as well, with the result that streams, in many cases, became overloaded with wastes and now the problem is, what to do about it? Frequently the statement is made that some industry is finding profit in processing their waste. Often, comments are made suggesting the dairy industry should do the same. Some branches of the industry have been fortunate enough to find by-products which will at least pay for their manufacturing cost. This is primarily true in production of cheese and butter. Approximate production figures indicate that there was 120 billion pounds of milk produced in 1951. Of this amount, about 24 per cent was used in butter production and 9 per cent for cheese. Most dairy wastes are collected in the floor drains and are diluted by the time they reach a point where they can be collected in any volume. This contamination and dilution of the milk makes by-product utilization impractical by known methods for most of the industry. With the possibility of by-products eliminated it is necessary to consider the disposal of wastes by other methods. Until recent years, there seemed to be a tendency to design disposal plants according to existing sewer loads and these high loadings combined with expensive types of plant designs made the cost for disposal plants almost prohibitive. After working in various milk plants, visiting numerous other milk plants, and discussing the problem with men in disposal plant occupations, it was concluded that: When taking up the matter of waste disposal, one must take up the matter of waste reduction at the same time, or preferably before even determining the magnitude of the disposal problem. It seems as though the natural reaction of the average man when faced with a problem is to work on overcoming the effect rather than isolating and combating the basic cause. The original milk loss is the basic cause of the disposal problem and a fight 474 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 474