page 617 |
Previous | 1 of 5 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
SUCCESSFUL PRETREATMENT AND DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF CHEMICAL PLANT WASTEWATER Ray S. Dugas, Environmental Engineer Uniroyal Chemical Geismar Plant Geismar, Louisiana 70734 Paul E. Reed, Manager Environmental Control Department Uniroyal Chemical Division Uniroyal, Inc. Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 INTRODUCTION On October 30, 1970 the Louisiana Stream Control Commission approved a discharge permit and waste treatment procedures for water pollution control and abatement for Uniroyal's Geismar Chemical Plant Complex. Subsequently, Corps of Engineers discharge permit applications were filed and updated beginning June 1971. Waste abatement practices included recycle and reuse of unreacted raw materials and solvents; collection and incineration of waste liquids; collection and landfilling of waste solids; recycle and reuse of water; segregation and neutralization of waste streams, including contaminated storm waters; pretreating and injecting contaminated portions to deep-wells below 3600 ft and discharging essentially uncontaminated waste and rain waters to the Mississippi River. By the end of 1972, cumulative abatement efforts succeeded in markedly reducing pollution loads to the Mississippi River—for example, COD by over 95%, BOD5 by over 97% and chlorinated hydrocarbons by 100%. Prior to drilling the first disposal well, Uniroyal and four other chemical companies jointly commissioned a geological survey of the Geisma>-/St. Gabriel, Louisiana area. This same group also funded a study to determine if all abandoned oil and gas wells within a 2-1/2- mile radius of the disposal well sites had been adequately plugged. Lacking in-company expertise, we engaged a petroleum engineering consultant with a proven record in the field of subsurface disposal to engineer and supervise the drilling of our wells. The well design recommended and used for the wells is shown in Figure 1. Uniroyal has two identical wells spaced 470 ft apart, both drilled into the same 200-ft thick sand strata at 3500 ft. It has a third well 235 ft from the first, drilled to a 200-ft sand strata at 5900 ft. The wells are constructed as follows: (Refer to Figure I) 1. 12-3/8-in.-diameter surface casing, to 200 ft below the freshwater strata, cemented back to surface. 2. 9-5/8-in.-diameter well casing (Long String), from surface to the top of the inject- tion strata, cemented full length. 3. 7-in.-diameter injection tubing, sealed inside the well casing at top and bottom. The annular space is liquid full. The annulus pressure is continuously recorded. 4. Completion is with a 6-5/8-in.-diameter screen and liner gravel packed. Total investment in the collection, pretreatment and disposal system facilities exceeds $2 million; annual operating costs exceed $250,000. 617
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1977062 |
Title | Successful pretreatment and deep-well injection of chemical plant wastewater |
Author |
Dugas, Ray S. Reed, Paul E. |
Date of Original | 1977 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 32nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,26931 |
Extent of Original | p. 617-621 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-01 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 617 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | SUCCESSFUL PRETREATMENT AND DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF CHEMICAL PLANT WASTEWATER Ray S. Dugas, Environmental Engineer Uniroyal Chemical Geismar Plant Geismar, Louisiana 70734 Paul E. Reed, Manager Environmental Control Department Uniroyal Chemical Division Uniroyal, Inc. Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 INTRODUCTION On October 30, 1970 the Louisiana Stream Control Commission approved a discharge permit and waste treatment procedures for water pollution control and abatement for Uniroyal's Geismar Chemical Plant Complex. Subsequently, Corps of Engineers discharge permit applications were filed and updated beginning June 1971. Waste abatement practices included recycle and reuse of unreacted raw materials and solvents; collection and incineration of waste liquids; collection and landfilling of waste solids; recycle and reuse of water; segregation and neutralization of waste streams, including contaminated storm waters; pretreating and injecting contaminated portions to deep-wells below 3600 ft and discharging essentially uncontaminated waste and rain waters to the Mississippi River. By the end of 1972, cumulative abatement efforts succeeded in markedly reducing pollution loads to the Mississippi River—for example, COD by over 95%, BOD5 by over 97% and chlorinated hydrocarbons by 100%. Prior to drilling the first disposal well, Uniroyal and four other chemical companies jointly commissioned a geological survey of the Geisma>-/St. Gabriel, Louisiana area. This same group also funded a study to determine if all abandoned oil and gas wells within a 2-1/2- mile radius of the disposal well sites had been adequately plugged. Lacking in-company expertise, we engaged a petroleum engineering consultant with a proven record in the field of subsurface disposal to engineer and supervise the drilling of our wells. The well design recommended and used for the wells is shown in Figure 1. Uniroyal has two identical wells spaced 470 ft apart, both drilled into the same 200-ft thick sand strata at 3500 ft. It has a third well 235 ft from the first, drilled to a 200-ft sand strata at 5900 ft. The wells are constructed as follows: (Refer to Figure I) 1. 12-3/8-in.-diameter surface casing, to 200 ft below the freshwater strata, cemented back to surface. 2. 9-5/8-in.-diameter well casing (Long String), from surface to the top of the inject- tion strata, cemented full length. 3. 7-in.-diameter injection tubing, sealed inside the well casing at top and bottom. The annular space is liquid full. The annulus pressure is continuously recorded. 4. Completion is with a 6-5/8-in.-diameter screen and liner gravel packed. Total investment in the collection, pretreatment and disposal system facilities exceeds $2 million; annual operating costs exceed $250,000. 617 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 617