page 876 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER CONTAINING NITROGLYCERIN AND NITRATED ESTERS Robert P. Carnahan, Deputy Chief Petroleum & Environmental Technology Division U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Research & Development Command Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060 Leonard Smith, Senior Process Engineer Hercules Corporation Wilmington, Delaware 19899 INTRODUCTION Due to the Federal Water Pollution Act and its recent amendments, the U.S. Army is engaged in an extensive modernization and pollution abatement program at all of is ammunition plants. The treatment of wastewaters containing explosives such as nitroglycerin and nitrate esters has been of particular concern. For example, at Radford Army Ammunition Plant the wastewater discharged from the manufacture of nitroglycerin is 36,000 gal/day at a production rate of 17,000 lb/day of nitroglycerin. This wastewater contains approximately 3600 pounds of dissolved solids, of which 210 lb are nitrate/nitrite/nitrogen and 47 lb are nitroglycerin [1]. Epstein era/. [2] also confirmed these figures but also found the glyceryl mononitrate and dinitrate as well as carbonyls. The pollution abatement problems associated with nitrated esters, structures of which are shown in Table I, are to eliminate the explosive potential of the waste and produce a waste which can be discharged or further treated biologically. In solving these problems a review of the literature was made to determine what processes were the most industrially feasible. Results of this review showed that alkaline hydrolysis with lime, oxidation with ozone, permanganate or dichromate, and reduction with sodium sulfide were feasible processes. Each of these processes were evaluated in bench-scale studies by Smith and Dickenson [3]. Smith and Dickenson [3] results showed that alkaline hydrolysis with lime and reduction with sodium sulfide were the most effective denitration processes. Their results showed that if the pH was maintained at 11 the hydrolysis of the glycerol dinitrate (DNG) and glycerol trinitrate (NG) was complete in 30 min. With an average alkalinity of 4600 mg/1 it was estimated that 20 lb of lime per 1000 gal of wastewater was sufficient to complete the denitration step. Their results [3] also substantiated Boschen, et al. [4] work which showed that at pH 13 the mechanism for reduction was nucleophillic attack by the sulfide on the nitrogen. They found that 0.71 lb of sodium sulfide was required to denitrate one pound of NG, while 0.43 lb was required to denitrate one pound of DNG. This compared favorably with the theoretical requirements of 0.52 and 0.43. In oxidation studies [3] the economics of using permanganate, dichromate and ozone were prohibitive. For example, 2.8 lb of ozone was required to oxidize one pound of NG. Based upon the literature review and bench-scale studies a pilot plant using sulfide reduction and alkaline hydrolysis was constructed at Radford Army Ammunition Plant. The reduction process was used to treat the nitrated esters wastewater, while alkaline hydrolysis was used to treat NG and DNG wastewaters. The flow sheet for the pilot plant is shown in Figure 1. 876
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1977089 |
Title | Treatment of wastewater containing nitroglycerin and nitrated esters |
Author |
Carnahan, Robert P. Smith, Leonard (Leonard L.) |
Date of Original | 1977 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 32nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,26931 |
Extent of Original | p. 876-887 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University LIbraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-01 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 876 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER CONTAINING NITROGLYCERIN AND NITRATED ESTERS Robert P. Carnahan, Deputy Chief Petroleum & Environmental Technology Division U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Research & Development Command Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060 Leonard Smith, Senior Process Engineer Hercules Corporation Wilmington, Delaware 19899 INTRODUCTION Due to the Federal Water Pollution Act and its recent amendments, the U.S. Army is engaged in an extensive modernization and pollution abatement program at all of is ammunition plants. The treatment of wastewaters containing explosives such as nitroglycerin and nitrate esters has been of particular concern. For example, at Radford Army Ammunition Plant the wastewater discharged from the manufacture of nitroglycerin is 36,000 gal/day at a production rate of 17,000 lb/day of nitroglycerin. This wastewater contains approximately 3600 pounds of dissolved solids, of which 210 lb are nitrate/nitrite/nitrogen and 47 lb are nitroglycerin [1]. Epstein era/. [2] also confirmed these figures but also found the glyceryl mononitrate and dinitrate as well as carbonyls. The pollution abatement problems associated with nitrated esters, structures of which are shown in Table I, are to eliminate the explosive potential of the waste and produce a waste which can be discharged or further treated biologically. In solving these problems a review of the literature was made to determine what processes were the most industrially feasible. Results of this review showed that alkaline hydrolysis with lime, oxidation with ozone, permanganate or dichromate, and reduction with sodium sulfide were feasible processes. Each of these processes were evaluated in bench-scale studies by Smith and Dickenson [3]. Smith and Dickenson [3] results showed that alkaline hydrolysis with lime and reduction with sodium sulfide were the most effective denitration processes. Their results showed that if the pH was maintained at 11 the hydrolysis of the glycerol dinitrate (DNG) and glycerol trinitrate (NG) was complete in 30 min. With an average alkalinity of 4600 mg/1 it was estimated that 20 lb of lime per 1000 gal of wastewater was sufficient to complete the denitration step. Their results [3] also substantiated Boschen, et al. [4] work which showed that at pH 13 the mechanism for reduction was nucleophillic attack by the sulfide on the nitrogen. They found that 0.71 lb of sodium sulfide was required to denitrate one pound of NG, while 0.43 lb was required to denitrate one pound of DNG. This compared favorably with the theoretical requirements of 0.52 and 0.43. In oxidation studies [3] the economics of using permanganate, dichromate and ozone were prohibitive. For example, 2.8 lb of ozone was required to oxidize one pound of NG. Based upon the literature review and bench-scale studies a pilot plant using sulfide reduction and alkaline hydrolysis was constructed at Radford Army Ammunition Plant. The reduction process was used to treat the nitrated esters wastewater, while alkaline hydrolysis was used to treat NG and DNG wastewaters. The flow sheet for the pilot plant is shown in Figure 1. 876 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 876