page841 |
Previous | 1 of 9 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Batch Treatment for Industrial Wastes ROBERT L. IRVINE, Associate Professor RICHARD O. RICHTER, Graduate Student Department of Civil Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 THOMAS P. FOX, Facilities Manager QLM Laboratories, Inc. Nyack, New York 10960 INTRODUCTION The national goal of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500) is that the discharge of all pollutants into navigatable waters be eliminated by 1985. To meet this goal the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was required to publish Federal standards of performance for treatment for a list of categories of sources as delineated by the Act. The first step was to publish standards that could be met by application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPCTCA). For many industries and most munitipalities BPCTCA means biological waste treatment. Conventional biological waste treatment may be accomplished in either Activated Sludge or Trickling Filter plants. The more recent trend is to employ activated sludge systems. These systems are operated on a continuous flow basis. Because of variations in flow, total waste strength and make-up of the pollutants in the waste flow, activated sludge systems with equalization, while recommended by the EPA as BPCTCA, cannot, in many cases, consistently meet the standards established by the EPA. In most situations, equalization systems cannot effectively dampen large variations in waste strength if they are designed for hydraulic equalization with no organic removal. Design for waste strength equalization in these cases may lead both to excessive expenditures and to operation and maintenance problems. Biological waste treatment is likely to be the only economical and perhaps the only feasible way to remove many organic compounds in wastewaters. This is not meant to undermine the rather excellent work that has been done in the physical chemical treatment area. In fact it is stated with the understanding that certain classes of organic compounds cannot be removed in biological waste treatment systems. This is demonstrated time and time again with treated effluents which have a five day biological oxygen demand (BOD5) of less than 20 mg/1 and a total organic carbon (TOC) concentration of greater than 100 mg/1. As advances are made towards a zero discharge goal, economics of treatment will not be overlooked. Combined biological and physical-chemical treatment systems of the future will be able to take full advantage of the removal capabilities of both treatment approaches. High loaded biological systems will be designed to perform the function for which they are 841
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1975073 |
Title | Batch treatment for industrial wastes |
Author |
Irvine, Robert L. Richter, Richard O. Fox, Thomas P. |
Date of Original | 1975 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 30th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,25691 |
Extent of Original | p. 841-849 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-30 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page841 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Batch Treatment for Industrial Wastes ROBERT L. IRVINE, Associate Professor RICHARD O. RICHTER, Graduate Student Department of Civil Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 THOMAS P. FOX, Facilities Manager QLM Laboratories, Inc. Nyack, New York 10960 INTRODUCTION The national goal of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500) is that the discharge of all pollutants into navigatable waters be eliminated by 1985. To meet this goal the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was required to publish Federal standards of performance for treatment for a list of categories of sources as delineated by the Act. The first step was to publish standards that could be met by application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPCTCA). For many industries and most munitipalities BPCTCA means biological waste treatment. Conventional biological waste treatment may be accomplished in either Activated Sludge or Trickling Filter plants. The more recent trend is to employ activated sludge systems. These systems are operated on a continuous flow basis. Because of variations in flow, total waste strength and make-up of the pollutants in the waste flow, activated sludge systems with equalization, while recommended by the EPA as BPCTCA, cannot, in many cases, consistently meet the standards established by the EPA. In most situations, equalization systems cannot effectively dampen large variations in waste strength if they are designed for hydraulic equalization with no organic removal. Design for waste strength equalization in these cases may lead both to excessive expenditures and to operation and maintenance problems. Biological waste treatment is likely to be the only economical and perhaps the only feasible way to remove many organic compounds in wastewaters. This is not meant to undermine the rather excellent work that has been done in the physical chemical treatment area. In fact it is stated with the understanding that certain classes of organic compounds cannot be removed in biological waste treatment systems. This is demonstrated time and time again with treated effluents which have a five day biological oxygen demand (BOD5) of less than 20 mg/1 and a total organic carbon (TOC) concentration of greater than 100 mg/1. As advances are made towards a zero discharge goal, economics of treatment will not be overlooked. Combined biological and physical-chemical treatment systems of the future will be able to take full advantage of the removal capabilities of both treatment approaches. High loaded biological systems will be designed to perform the function for which they are 841 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page841