page621 |
Previous | 1 of 11 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatment of Strong Industrial Wastes In A Municipal Facility by Aerated Stabilization WESLEY A. FLOWER, Waste Treatment Engineer The Miami Conservancy District Dayton, Ohio 45402 Aerated stabilization, in the extreme sense, is the process provided by nature to treat organic wastes discharged into surface waters. In this system, we attempt to optimize by engineering methods those physical, chemical and biological processes which occur haphazardly in nature. Aerated stabilization is often confused with aerated lagoons, but the two are distinctly different. Aerated lagoons are probably the closest waste treatment process to nature's method of purifying streams in that a large body of water is stored and aerated to maintain a sufficient oxygen content. However, in the system the only real concern is usually for the dissolved oxygen level, and the suspended solids often settle to the bottom where anaerobic digestion takes place with release of nutrients and carbonaceous matter. The aerated stabilization system, on the other hand, though still taking advantage of the long-term detention typical of aerated lagoons, requires careful consideration of basin geometry, liquid velocities and dissolved oxygen profiles in order to prevent the deposition of solids and the subsequent regeneration of nutrients. The system combines the properties of efficiency and reliability with economy of operation. It was primarily these considerations which influenced the selection of aerated stabilization as the secondary treatment process for The Miami Conservancy District's regional treatment plant at Franklin, Ohio. BACKGROUND This somewhat novel approach is not entirely without precedent. In describing the development of the world's first successful flood control network built by the District early in this century, Colonel Edward A. Deeds referred to "a new, and sometimes bold approach from an engineering viewpoint . . ."In looking back at the situation in Franklin in the late 1960's, the need for a "new and bold approach" is evident. The "blue-collar" community of 10,000 population was served by a 40-year-old, 400,000-gallon-per-day (gpd) trickling filter plant which was in a poor state of repair. Upgrading to meet minimal discharge requirements then in force was projected to be $1.44 million. In addition, the five paper mills in town generated an average waste load of 110,000 pounds chemical oxygen demand (COD) per day (250,000 P.E.), and a peak load of 1,000,000 pounds COD per day (2,500,000 P.E). The industries were desperate in their frustration to obtain adequate and economical waste treatment, and the community leaders were worried about possible loss of the industries upon which the local economy was heavily dependent. Add to this a strong liquid waste from the city's new solid waste recovery plant, and a river with seasonally low flow and critical dissolved oxygen problems. 621
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1975053 |
Title | Treatment of strong industrial wastes in a municipal facility by aerated stabilization |
Author | Flower, W. A. (Wesley A.) |
Date of Original | 1975 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 30th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,25691 |
Extent of Original | p. 621-631 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-29 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page621 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatment of Strong Industrial Wastes In A Municipal Facility by Aerated Stabilization WESLEY A. FLOWER, Waste Treatment Engineer The Miami Conservancy District Dayton, Ohio 45402 Aerated stabilization, in the extreme sense, is the process provided by nature to treat organic wastes discharged into surface waters. In this system, we attempt to optimize by engineering methods those physical, chemical and biological processes which occur haphazardly in nature. Aerated stabilization is often confused with aerated lagoons, but the two are distinctly different. Aerated lagoons are probably the closest waste treatment process to nature's method of purifying streams in that a large body of water is stored and aerated to maintain a sufficient oxygen content. However, in the system the only real concern is usually for the dissolved oxygen level, and the suspended solids often settle to the bottom where anaerobic digestion takes place with release of nutrients and carbonaceous matter. The aerated stabilization system, on the other hand, though still taking advantage of the long-term detention typical of aerated lagoons, requires careful consideration of basin geometry, liquid velocities and dissolved oxygen profiles in order to prevent the deposition of solids and the subsequent regeneration of nutrients. The system combines the properties of efficiency and reliability with economy of operation. It was primarily these considerations which influenced the selection of aerated stabilization as the secondary treatment process for The Miami Conservancy District's regional treatment plant at Franklin, Ohio. BACKGROUND This somewhat novel approach is not entirely without precedent. In describing the development of the world's first successful flood control network built by the District early in this century, Colonel Edward A. Deeds referred to "a new, and sometimes bold approach from an engineering viewpoint . . ."In looking back at the situation in Franklin in the late 1960's, the need for a "new and bold approach" is evident. The "blue-collar" community of 10,000 population was served by a 40-year-old, 400,000-gallon-per-day (gpd) trickling filter plant which was in a poor state of repair. Upgrading to meet minimal discharge requirements then in force was projected to be $1.44 million. In addition, the five paper mills in town generated an average waste load of 110,000 pounds chemical oxygen demand (COD) per day (250,000 P.E.), and a peak load of 1,000,000 pounds COD per day (2,500,000 P.E). The industries were desperate in their frustration to obtain adequate and economical waste treatment, and the community leaders were worried about possible loss of the industries upon which the local economy was heavily dependent. Add to this a strong liquid waste from the city's new solid waste recovery plant, and a river with seasonally low flow and critical dissolved oxygen problems. 621 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page621