page216 |
Previous | 1 of 17 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatment of Oil Refinery Wastewaters with Granular and Powdered Activated Carbon PASCHAL B. DeJOHN, Project Leader ALAN D. ADAMS, Technical Specialist ICI United States Inc. Specialty Chemicals Division Wilmington, Delaware 19897 INTRODUCTION As refineries strive to achieve "best practicable control technology currently available" by July 1, 1977, and "best available technology economically achievable" by July 1, 1983, the use of both granular and powdered activated carbon to treat total refinery effluents or selected wastewater streams within the refinery comple> will become increasingly warranted. ICI United States Inc. has conducted numerous comparative pilot granular carbon studies, and several full scale in-plant powdered carbon evaluations to determine the effectiveness of carbon in solving refinery wastewater problems. GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON Comparative Adsorption Performance of Lignite and Bituminous Coal Carbons in Oil Refinery Wastes For granular activated carbon to be an effective treatment mode, it must provide: I) sufficient ability to adsorb impurities to meet effluent standards; 2) reasonable (5-10% total) regeneration losses; 3) minimal operating problems (pressure drop); and 4) reasonable operating costs. Studies conducted by ICI United States Inc. were run to determine if granular carbon could meet the above criteria, and also to find out if any performance differences exist between the two major commercially available carbon types. Tables I and II show data from studies conducted on the total refinery effluent at two East Coast oil refineries where equal volumes of lignite and bituminous coal carbons were evaluated. Table 111 is data from a study conducted on a selected sulfonate wastestream at a West Coast oil refinery. Again equal volumes of lignite and bituminous coal carbons were evaluated. In each study, the feed concentration to the columns containing the lignite and bituminous coal carbons was the same. Breakthrough was the required pollutant percentage removal, directed by each individual refinery, based on the effluent standard each was required to meet. 216
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1975020 |
Title | Treatment of oil refinery wastewaters with granular and powdered activated carbon |
Author |
DeJohn, Paschal B. Adams, Alan D. |
Date of Original | 1975 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 30th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,25691 |
Extent of Original | p. 216-232 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-25 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page216 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatment of Oil Refinery Wastewaters with Granular and Powdered Activated Carbon PASCHAL B. DeJOHN, Project Leader ALAN D. ADAMS, Technical Specialist ICI United States Inc. Specialty Chemicals Division Wilmington, Delaware 19897 INTRODUCTION As refineries strive to achieve "best practicable control technology currently available" by July 1, 1977, and "best available technology economically achievable" by July 1, 1983, the use of both granular and powdered activated carbon to treat total refinery effluents or selected wastewater streams within the refinery comple> will become increasingly warranted. ICI United States Inc. has conducted numerous comparative pilot granular carbon studies, and several full scale in-plant powdered carbon evaluations to determine the effectiveness of carbon in solving refinery wastewater problems. GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON Comparative Adsorption Performance of Lignite and Bituminous Coal Carbons in Oil Refinery Wastes For granular activated carbon to be an effective treatment mode, it must provide: I) sufficient ability to adsorb impurities to meet effluent standards; 2) reasonable (5-10% total) regeneration losses; 3) minimal operating problems (pressure drop); and 4) reasonable operating costs. Studies conducted by ICI United States Inc. were run to determine if granular carbon could meet the above criteria, and also to find out if any performance differences exist between the two major commercially available carbon types. Tables I and II show data from studies conducted on the total refinery effluent at two East Coast oil refineries where equal volumes of lignite and bituminous coal carbons were evaluated. Table 111 is data from a study conducted on a selected sulfonate wastestream at a West Coast oil refinery. Again equal volumes of lignite and bituminous coal carbons were evaluated. In each study, the feed concentration to the columns containing the lignite and bituminous coal carbons was the same. Breakthrough was the required pollutant percentage removal, directed by each individual refinery, based on the effluent standard each was required to meet. 216 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page216