page078 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
A Study of Heavy Metal Emissions From Fluidized Bed Incinerators BRIAN J. COPELAND. Manager Technical Services Copeland Systems. Incorporated Oakbrook, Illinois 60521 INTRODUCTION Over the past ten years. Government regulatory agencies and designers of pollution control equipment have become increasingly aware of the need for an advanced study of the effect of heavy metal emissions on the environment. Heavy metals form organic complexes with human enzymes which have an adverse effect on the central nervous system and the ability of the blood to absorb life giving oxygen. Science has defined dangerous blood level concentrations, but specific municipal and industrial emission levels are yet to be fully specified. Obvious sources: automobiles, lead smelting facilities, and chlorine caustic soda plants have been required to modify their effluent streams to reduce heavy metal output. The Environmental Protection Agency's task force on sewage sludge incineration studied the emissions from five municipal incinerators in 1971 (Lake Tahoe and Barstow. California; Loron. Virginia: Waldwick, New Jersey: and Monterey, California) and concluded that these particular incinerators were in compliance with established regulations for particulate and gaseous emissions. However, their analyses of heavy metals only concluded that further study was required. To date, the only published air pollution regulations is a mass emission of 3.200 grams per day for the element mercury. Industrial threshold limits have been defined for other elements for personnel health and safety. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published "Emission Factors For Trace Substances" (I). No legality has been attached to either of these guidelines. The need for specific regulations came to light in March of 1974. The operation of all sewage sludge incinerators in Prince George's County. Maryland was banned. The injunction was based on allegations that the operation of the fluidized bed incinerators at the Piscataway Waste Treatment Plant for a total of 73 hours had been responsible for the blood lead level of three children in the Piscataway Hills area being 40 to 43 micrograms of lead per 100 milliliters. Mr. Daniel Snyder of the EPA stated to the Washington Post that, "It is highly unlikely almost to the point of being impossible that there is a cause-etfect relationship between the use of these incinerators and the levels of lead in the children" (2). The proximity of the Piscataway plant to the greater Washington area and the Washington Capital Beltway were deemed the most probable cause, but the problem had been reduced from one of technology to one of public emotion and the operation and startup of sludge incinerators in Prince George's County was held in limbo until September of 1974. In the interim period, an independent heavy metal analysis was conducted on a fluid bed incinerator, in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, similar to those at the Piscataway and 78
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1975006 |
Title | Study of heavy metal emissions from fluidized bed incinerators |
Author | Copeland, Brian J. |
Date of Original | 1975 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 30th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,25691 |
Extent of Original | p. 78-89 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-25 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page078 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | A Study of Heavy Metal Emissions From Fluidized Bed Incinerators BRIAN J. COPELAND. Manager Technical Services Copeland Systems. Incorporated Oakbrook, Illinois 60521 INTRODUCTION Over the past ten years. Government regulatory agencies and designers of pollution control equipment have become increasingly aware of the need for an advanced study of the effect of heavy metal emissions on the environment. Heavy metals form organic complexes with human enzymes which have an adverse effect on the central nervous system and the ability of the blood to absorb life giving oxygen. Science has defined dangerous blood level concentrations, but specific municipal and industrial emission levels are yet to be fully specified. Obvious sources: automobiles, lead smelting facilities, and chlorine caustic soda plants have been required to modify their effluent streams to reduce heavy metal output. The Environmental Protection Agency's task force on sewage sludge incineration studied the emissions from five municipal incinerators in 1971 (Lake Tahoe and Barstow. California; Loron. Virginia: Waldwick, New Jersey: and Monterey, California) and concluded that these particular incinerators were in compliance with established regulations for particulate and gaseous emissions. However, their analyses of heavy metals only concluded that further study was required. To date, the only published air pollution regulations is a mass emission of 3.200 grams per day for the element mercury. Industrial threshold limits have been defined for other elements for personnel health and safety. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published "Emission Factors For Trace Substances" (I). No legality has been attached to either of these guidelines. The need for specific regulations came to light in March of 1974. The operation of all sewage sludge incinerators in Prince George's County. Maryland was banned. The injunction was based on allegations that the operation of the fluidized bed incinerators at the Piscataway Waste Treatment Plant for a total of 73 hours had been responsible for the blood lead level of three children in the Piscataway Hills area being 40 to 43 micrograms of lead per 100 milliliters. Mr. Daniel Snyder of the EPA stated to the Washington Post that, "It is highly unlikely almost to the point of being impossible that there is a cause-etfect relationship between the use of these incinerators and the levels of lead in the children" (2). The proximity of the Piscataway plant to the greater Washington area and the Washington Capital Beltway were deemed the most probable cause, but the problem had been reduced from one of technology to one of public emotion and the operation and startup of sludge incinerators in Prince George's County was held in limbo until September of 1974. In the interim period, an independent heavy metal analysis was conducted on a fluid bed incinerator, in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, similar to those at the Piscataway and 78 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page078