page864 |
Previous | 1 of 17 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatment of Two Coke Plant Wastewaters To Meet Guideline Criteria CARL E. ADAMS, JR., President ROBERT M. STEIN, Project Engineer W.WESLEY ECKENFELDER, JR., Chairman of the Board Associated Water and Air Resources Engineers Nashville, Tennessee 37215 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Coke plant effluents have traditionally been cited for discharging toxic constituents and have been considered relatively difficult to treat. The federal guidelines, which have recently been issued, express the allowed discharge of constituents in pounds of contaminant per ton of coke produced. These values are shown in Table 1 along with the approximate concentration, considering 150 gallons of wastewater generated per ton of coke produced. The best practical control technology currently available (BPCTCA) guidelines, which consider best practical treatment to be biological, do not appear to be stringent by comparison with typical effluents from biological treatment facilities treating organic chemicals wastestreams. The concentrations shown in Table I infer that the respective coke plant has a flow of 150 gallons per ton of production. This is not always the case and could cause problems with coke plants which have a larger water use even though they are observing strict in-plant water conservation. TABLE I EPA GUIDELINES BY-PRODUCT COKE Level I Level II lbs/ton mg/1 lbs/ton mg/1 Cvanide 0.0438 35.0 0.0002 0.16 Phenol 0.003 2.4 0.0004 0.32 Ammonia 0.1824 145.8 0.0084 6.7 BOD 0.219 175 0.0166 13.2 Sulfide — — 0.0002 0.16 Oil and Grease 0.0218 17.4 0.0084 6.7 TSS 0.073 58.3 0.0084 6.7 pH 6.0 to 9.0 6.0 to 9.0 The two coke plants which are discussed herein are completely independent of each other and are owned and operated by two separate managements. Because of similarities observed during treatability studies on the wastestreams from these two plants, it was felt appropriate to discuss relative comparisons in a single paper. Associated Water and Air Resources Engineers, Inc. (AWARE) of Nashville, Tennessee were retained to develop a wastewater management program for the two coke plants considering best practical treatment as defined by the EPA guidelines. The relative productions of the two plants, designated Plant A and Plant B, were 2,700 and 2,100 tons of coke per day, respectively. This paper discusses the production processes and sources of wastewater which were 864
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197481 |
Title | Treatment of two coke plant wastewaters to meet guideline criteria |
Author |
Adams, Carl E. (Carl Erving), 1943- Stein, Robert M. Eckenfelder, W. Wesley (William Wesley), 1926- |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 864-880 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-05 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page864 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatment of Two Coke Plant Wastewaters To Meet Guideline Criteria CARL E. ADAMS, JR., President ROBERT M. STEIN, Project Engineer W.WESLEY ECKENFELDER, JR., Chairman of the Board Associated Water and Air Resources Engineers Nashville, Tennessee 37215 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Coke plant effluents have traditionally been cited for discharging toxic constituents and have been considered relatively difficult to treat. The federal guidelines, which have recently been issued, express the allowed discharge of constituents in pounds of contaminant per ton of coke produced. These values are shown in Table 1 along with the approximate concentration, considering 150 gallons of wastewater generated per ton of coke produced. The best practical control technology currently available (BPCTCA) guidelines, which consider best practical treatment to be biological, do not appear to be stringent by comparison with typical effluents from biological treatment facilities treating organic chemicals wastestreams. The concentrations shown in Table I infer that the respective coke plant has a flow of 150 gallons per ton of production. This is not always the case and could cause problems with coke plants which have a larger water use even though they are observing strict in-plant water conservation. TABLE I EPA GUIDELINES BY-PRODUCT COKE Level I Level II lbs/ton mg/1 lbs/ton mg/1 Cvanide 0.0438 35.0 0.0002 0.16 Phenol 0.003 2.4 0.0004 0.32 Ammonia 0.1824 145.8 0.0084 6.7 BOD 0.219 175 0.0166 13.2 Sulfide — — 0.0002 0.16 Oil and Grease 0.0218 17.4 0.0084 6.7 TSS 0.073 58.3 0.0084 6.7 pH 6.0 to 9.0 6.0 to 9.0 The two coke plants which are discussed herein are completely independent of each other and are owned and operated by two separate managements. Because of similarities observed during treatability studies on the wastestreams from these two plants, it was felt appropriate to discuss relative comparisons in a single paper. Associated Water and Air Resources Engineers, Inc. (AWARE) of Nashville, Tennessee were retained to develop a wastewater management program for the two coke plants considering best practical treatment as defined by the EPA guidelines. The relative productions of the two plants, designated Plant A and Plant B, were 2,700 and 2,100 tons of coke per day, respectively. This paper discusses the production processes and sources of wastewater which were 864 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page864