page686 |
Previous | 1 of 18 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economics of Coal Mine Drainage Treatment H.G. BHATT, Assistant Chief Sanitary Engineer Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Beaver, Pennsylvania 15009 INTRODUCTION The damaging environmental effects of mine drainage pollution has been a topic of discussion for over 60 years. The restoration of the streams affected by mine drainage would involve expenditure of large sums of money. The environmental protection agency estimated the cost for "at source" abatement of mine drainage and water treatment range from $218 million to $656 million for a 20-year period. Garvey believes the high figure is too low and should be in the neighborhood of two billion dollars. The object of this paper is to evaluate the capital and operating cost of the various methods of mine drainage treatment. Although there is no "typical" mine drainage, waters discharging from mines can be divided into four general classes as shown in Table I. TABLE I CLASSIFICATION OF MINE DRAINAGE Class II Class III Partially Oxidized Oxidized and Class IV Class I and/or Neutralized and/or Neutralized and Acid Discharges Neutralized Alkaline Not Oxidized pH 2-4.5 3.5-6.6 6.5-10.5 6.5-8.5 Acidity, mg/1 CaCO, 1,000-15,000 0-1,000 0 0 Ferrous Iron, mg/1 500-10,000 0-500 0 50-1,000 Ferric Iron, mg/1 0 0-1,000 0 0 Aluminum, mg/1 0-2,000 0-20 0 0 Sulfate, mg/1 1.000-20,000 500-10,000 500-10,000 500-10,000 Source: ln-house Studies, Environmental Protection Agency After Hill (I), 1968. The wide variations in mine drainage characteristics indicate that a number of treatment methods may be applicable. The capital and operating costs of the following mine drainage treatment methods are discussed: 1) Neutralization (acid mine water with high ferrous iron content and Acid mine water with high ferric iron content); 2) Flash Distillation; 3) Ion Exchange; 4) Reverse Osmosis; 5) Submerged Coal Refuse Combustion Process; 6) Freezing; 7) Electrodialysis; 8) Foam Separation; and 9) Neutradesulfating Process. NEUTRALIZATION Neutralization is the most widely used method of treating coal mine drainage. Neutralization historically has been applied to Class I and II mine drainage (Table I). Being cheap, calcium alkalies are widely used for neutralization, however, after treatment with calcium alkalies, the effluent has a higher hardness, may have a sulfate concentration up to 2,000 mg/1. Disposal of sludge generated is also a big problem and affects the economics of neutralization by calcium alkalies in as much as the cost of sludge disposal will also need to be incorporated in the total cost of treatment. When using limestone as a neutralizing agent, ferrous iron must be oxidized to ferric iron with the formation of free acid before calcium carbonate can react to neutralize the mine water and precipitate all iron. 686
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197466 |
Title | Economics of coal mine drainage treatment |
Author | Bhatt, H. G. |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 686-703 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-05 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page686 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Economics of Coal Mine Drainage Treatment H.G. BHATT, Assistant Chief Sanitary Engineer Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Beaver, Pennsylvania 15009 INTRODUCTION The damaging environmental effects of mine drainage pollution has been a topic of discussion for over 60 years. The restoration of the streams affected by mine drainage would involve expenditure of large sums of money. The environmental protection agency estimated the cost for "at source" abatement of mine drainage and water treatment range from $218 million to $656 million for a 20-year period. Garvey believes the high figure is too low and should be in the neighborhood of two billion dollars. The object of this paper is to evaluate the capital and operating cost of the various methods of mine drainage treatment. Although there is no "typical" mine drainage, waters discharging from mines can be divided into four general classes as shown in Table I. TABLE I CLASSIFICATION OF MINE DRAINAGE Class II Class III Partially Oxidized Oxidized and Class IV Class I and/or Neutralized and/or Neutralized and Acid Discharges Neutralized Alkaline Not Oxidized pH 2-4.5 3.5-6.6 6.5-10.5 6.5-8.5 Acidity, mg/1 CaCO, 1,000-15,000 0-1,000 0 0 Ferrous Iron, mg/1 500-10,000 0-500 0 50-1,000 Ferric Iron, mg/1 0 0-1,000 0 0 Aluminum, mg/1 0-2,000 0-20 0 0 Sulfate, mg/1 1.000-20,000 500-10,000 500-10,000 500-10,000 Source: ln-house Studies, Environmental Protection Agency After Hill (I), 1968. The wide variations in mine drainage characteristics indicate that a number of treatment methods may be applicable. The capital and operating costs of the following mine drainage treatment methods are discussed: 1) Neutralization (acid mine water with high ferrous iron content and Acid mine water with high ferric iron content); 2) Flash Distillation; 3) Ion Exchange; 4) Reverse Osmosis; 5) Submerged Coal Refuse Combustion Process; 6) Freezing; 7) Electrodialysis; 8) Foam Separation; and 9) Neutradesulfating Process. NEUTRALIZATION Neutralization is the most widely used method of treating coal mine drainage. Neutralization historically has been applied to Class I and II mine drainage (Table I). Being cheap, calcium alkalies are widely used for neutralization, however, after treatment with calcium alkalies, the effluent has a higher hardness, may have a sulfate concentration up to 2,000 mg/1. Disposal of sludge generated is also a big problem and affects the economics of neutralization by calcium alkalies in as much as the cost of sludge disposal will also need to be incorporated in the total cost of treatment. When using limestone as a neutralizing agent, ferrous iron must be oxidized to ferric iron with the formation of free acid before calcium carbonate can react to neutralize the mine water and precipitate all iron. 686 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page686