page283 |
Previous | 1 of 7 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatability Studies of Three Food Processing Plant Wastewaters C. FRED GURN.HAM, President THOMAS K. NEDVED, Vice President Gurnham and Associates, Inc. Chicago, Illinois 60606 INTRODUCTION The food processing industry is responsible for generating a large quantity of predominately organic wastes. This industry is composed of an extremely wide variety of plants (categories and subcategories in today's vernacular), including meat, fish, and poultry processors; dairies and dairy product manufacturers; fruit and vegetable canners and freezers; fermenters of malt, malt liquor, distilled spirits, and wines; beet and cane sugar processors; edible oil refiners; and many others. Wastewaters emanating from most food processing plants, although typically approximately ten times the strength of raw municipal sewage, have usually proved amenable to biological treatment processes with an appreciable degree of success. One pollutant parameter, the so-called hexane-extractable material (HEM) has received increasing attention. Fats, oils, and greases of animal and vegetable origin, present in bolh domestic and food industry discharges, are reported by the analyst as HEM. This has created a great deal of controversy and some consternation, as most experts want a test for oily matter of petroleum origin. Some of the difficulties are attributable to the following: 1) The non-specific nature of the "oil and grease" analysis; 2) The large number of materials, of diverse nature, detected by the standard method; and 3) The errors and variations inherent in both sampling and analytical procedures. The analytical reference traditionally employed in water pollution control is Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. The current 13th edition is divided into six sections; the two sections of interest here are "Physical and Chemical Examination of Natural and Treated Waters in the Absence of Gross Pollution" and "Physical, Chemical and Bioassay Examination of Polluted Waters, Wastewaters, Effluents, Bottom Sediments, and Sludges." Included in the first category are surface water, ground water, softened water, cooling or circulating water, process water, boiler water, and boiler feed water. In the second category are wastewaters of domestic and industrial origin, treatment plant effluents, and polluted waters. The 10th edition (1955) of Standard Methods described a direct extraction technique for determining "oil and grease" in a 1,000-ml sample of natural or treated water water in the absence of gross pollution; and a Soxhlet extraction technique for determining "grease" in sewage, treatment plant effluents, polluted waters and industrial wastes, using a sample containing from 50 to 150 mg of "grease." For industrial wastes high in "oils," a significantly less accurate and tentative semi-wet extraction method was suggested. All three methods used petroleum ether as the extracting solvent. Large sample sizes were required when measuring low concentrations; this complicated the laboratory and pilot-scale studies. The 11th edition (1960) added a Hydrocarbon and Fatty Matter Content of Grease section and changed the extracting solvent to n-hexane (not hexanes) for sewage and industrial wastes. Petroleum ether was retained as the extracting solvent in the water chapter. No explanation was presented in the text for the changes. The most recent edition (13th, 1971) is essentially the same as the 11 th in respect to oils and grease except that an alternate extraction solvent, trichlorotrifluoroethane, can be used 283
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197429 |
Title | Treatability studies of three food processing plant wastewaters |
Author |
Gurnham, C. Fred Nedved, Thomas K. |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 283-289 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-05 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page283 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatability Studies of Three Food Processing Plant Wastewaters C. FRED GURN.HAM, President THOMAS K. NEDVED, Vice President Gurnham and Associates, Inc. Chicago, Illinois 60606 INTRODUCTION The food processing industry is responsible for generating a large quantity of predominately organic wastes. This industry is composed of an extremely wide variety of plants (categories and subcategories in today's vernacular), including meat, fish, and poultry processors; dairies and dairy product manufacturers; fruit and vegetable canners and freezers; fermenters of malt, malt liquor, distilled spirits, and wines; beet and cane sugar processors; edible oil refiners; and many others. Wastewaters emanating from most food processing plants, although typically approximately ten times the strength of raw municipal sewage, have usually proved amenable to biological treatment processes with an appreciable degree of success. One pollutant parameter, the so-called hexane-extractable material (HEM) has received increasing attention. Fats, oils, and greases of animal and vegetable origin, present in bolh domestic and food industry discharges, are reported by the analyst as HEM. This has created a great deal of controversy and some consternation, as most experts want a test for oily matter of petroleum origin. Some of the difficulties are attributable to the following: 1) The non-specific nature of the "oil and grease" analysis; 2) The large number of materials, of diverse nature, detected by the standard method; and 3) The errors and variations inherent in both sampling and analytical procedures. The analytical reference traditionally employed in water pollution control is Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. The current 13th edition is divided into six sections; the two sections of interest here are "Physical and Chemical Examination of Natural and Treated Waters in the Absence of Gross Pollution" and "Physical, Chemical and Bioassay Examination of Polluted Waters, Wastewaters, Effluents, Bottom Sediments, and Sludges." Included in the first category are surface water, ground water, softened water, cooling or circulating water, process water, boiler water, and boiler feed water. In the second category are wastewaters of domestic and industrial origin, treatment plant effluents, and polluted waters. The 10th edition (1955) of Standard Methods described a direct extraction technique for determining "oil and grease" in a 1,000-ml sample of natural or treated water water in the absence of gross pollution; and a Soxhlet extraction technique for determining "grease" in sewage, treatment plant effluents, polluted waters and industrial wastes, using a sample containing from 50 to 150 mg of "grease." For industrial wastes high in "oils," a significantly less accurate and tentative semi-wet extraction method was suggested. All three methods used petroleum ether as the extracting solvent. Large sample sizes were required when measuring low concentrations; this complicated the laboratory and pilot-scale studies. The 11th edition (1960) added a Hydrocarbon and Fatty Matter Content of Grease section and changed the extracting solvent to n-hexane (not hexanes) for sewage and industrial wastes. Petroleum ether was retained as the extracting solvent in the water chapter. No explanation was presented in the text for the changes. The most recent edition (13th, 1971) is essentially the same as the 11 th in respect to oils and grease except that an alternate extraction solvent, trichlorotrifluoroethane, can be used 283 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page283