page262 |
Previous | 1 of 21 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Canneries Meet Best Practicable Control Technology Requirements S. BALAKRISHNAN, Engineer A.F. LISANTI, Engineer The Chester Engineers Coraopolis, Pennsylvania 15108 INTRODUCTION This paper presents the case histories of the wastewater treatment facilities of the four Comstock Foods Canneries. Each plant is located in upstate New York and the treatment facilities were designed to satisfy the requirements of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). In accomplishing that goal, we believe the treatment facilities will also satisfy the Best Practicable Control Technology required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is in the process of establishing the quantity or quality of constituents which may be discharged by a point source from the canned and preserved fruits and vegetables industry. These effluent limitations will be based on the best practicable control technology currently available (BPCTCA) and also on the best available technology economically achievable (BATEA). In the meantime, USEPA is using "interim effluent limitations"for issuing the permits and the values (1) for the raw materials used in these canneries as given in Table I. TABLE I EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (INTERIM)* RAW MATERIAL BPCTCA (INTERIM) BODs, lb/1,000 lb SS, lb/1,000 lb pH Beets 0.6 0.8 Carrots 0.6 0.85 within the Apples** 0.6(I.2)t 0.8(1.6) range Cabbage 0.15 0.10 6.0 to 9.0 Beans 0.8 1.0 * Average of 30 consecutive daily values ** BPCTCA published in March, 1974 t Figures in parentheses are maximum for any one day In the State of New York, in addition to the EPA's effluent Guidelines and Standards, the wastewater discharges must receive a minimum of secondary treatment and the waste load discharged must be well within the allocated limits. The allocations are based on the stream assimilative capacity and the number of users of the receiving stream. The case histories are presented in order to demonstrate the types of treatment facilities, cost and challenges involved in meeting the BPCTCA requirements. It is not the intent of the paper to evaluate all the parameters and requirements of the USEPA. RED CREEK PLANT Aerated lagoon treatment and controlled release of treated wastewater was selected for 262
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197428 |
Title | Canneries meet best practicable control technology requirements |
Author |
Balakrishnan, S. Lisanti, A. F. |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 262-282 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-05 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page262 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Canneries Meet Best Practicable Control Technology Requirements S. BALAKRISHNAN, Engineer A.F. LISANTI, Engineer The Chester Engineers Coraopolis, Pennsylvania 15108 INTRODUCTION This paper presents the case histories of the wastewater treatment facilities of the four Comstock Foods Canneries. Each plant is located in upstate New York and the treatment facilities were designed to satisfy the requirements of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). In accomplishing that goal, we believe the treatment facilities will also satisfy the Best Practicable Control Technology required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is in the process of establishing the quantity or quality of constituents which may be discharged by a point source from the canned and preserved fruits and vegetables industry. These effluent limitations will be based on the best practicable control technology currently available (BPCTCA) and also on the best available technology economically achievable (BATEA). In the meantime, USEPA is using "interim effluent limitations"for issuing the permits and the values (1) for the raw materials used in these canneries as given in Table I. TABLE I EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (INTERIM)* RAW MATERIAL BPCTCA (INTERIM) BODs, lb/1,000 lb SS, lb/1,000 lb pH Beets 0.6 0.8 Carrots 0.6 0.85 within the Apples** 0.6(I.2)t 0.8(1.6) range Cabbage 0.15 0.10 6.0 to 9.0 Beans 0.8 1.0 * Average of 30 consecutive daily values ** BPCTCA published in March, 1974 t Figures in parentheses are maximum for any one day In the State of New York, in addition to the EPA's effluent Guidelines and Standards, the wastewater discharges must receive a minimum of secondary treatment and the waste load discharged must be well within the allocated limits. The allocations are based on the stream assimilative capacity and the number of users of the receiving stream. The case histories are presented in order to demonstrate the types of treatment facilities, cost and challenges involved in meeting the BPCTCA requirements. It is not the intent of the paper to evaluate all the parameters and requirements of the USEPA. RED CREEK PLANT Aerated lagoon treatment and controlled release of treated wastewater was selected for 262 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page262