page230 |
Previous | 1 of 15 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatment of Refinery Wastewater Using Filtration and Carbon Adsorption B.A. McCRODDEN, Conservation Engineer BP Oil Incorporated Marcus Hook, Penn«vlvania 19061 INTRODUCTION A 2.2 MGD filtration carbon adsorption Wastewater Treatment Plant, placed in operation at the Marcus Hook Refinery of BP Oil Corporation, a subsidiary of the Standard Oil Company (Ohio), in March, 1973, has demonstrated overall removals of 76, 89, 42, 38, and 39 percent reduction for suspended solids, oil, first stage ultimate oxygen demand (FSUOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and phenol, respectively. The 105,000 BPD Class B Refinery, located in southeastern Pennsylvania, discharges its effluent waters into the Delaware River. In 1961, the Delaware Estuary became the subject of an intensive study by the then U.S. Public Health Service. The Delaware Estuary Comprehensive Study (DECS) served as a basis for a determination by the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) that the 1964 discharge loads to the Estuary exceeded its assimilative capacity. Subsequently, stream quality objectives were established and the Estuary divided into six zones. The total first stage ultimate oxygen demand permitted to be discharged without violating these objectives was determined for each zone from base data developed by the DECS and its application of a mathematical model. Under thedoctrine of equitable apportionment, each individual discharger to a zone received an allocation based upon the concept of equal percentage of raw waste reduction in that zone. The Refinery's measured raw waste load was 24,650 pounds per day FSUOD. Application of an 89.25 zone percent reduction led to an overall discharge allocation of 2,650 pounds per day FSUOD. This allocation includes the net contribution from the process wastewater and once through cooling water streams. An additional Delaware River Basin Commission requirement is the secondary treatment of all process wastewater streams. Secondary treatment for zone four of the Estuary is defined as 89.25 percent FSUOD reduction. In 1969 a compliance schedule of 48 months was established. The initial effort toward achieving compliance was the evaluation of the existing API oil-water-solids Separator, through which all process wastewater flow is directed. Monitoring of API Separator influent and effluent FSUOD determined an average of 68 percent removal, far below the DRBC's required 89.25 percent for process wastewater streams. Accordingly, a project to determine the treatability of the API Separator effluent, and a project to reduce the API Separator's hydraulic loading were undertaken. The latter project had as its basis an in- plant water use survey which concluded that a reduction in process wastewater flow to the API Separator could be accomplished by installation of a brine cooler; replacement of barometric condensers with surface condensers; segregation of sanitary wastes from the process wastewater stream; and further segregation of oily water and once through cooling water streams. The results of this project are evidenced by a reduction in the hydraulic loading from 3,750 to 1,700 gpm, Treatability of the API Separator effluent was investigated through the operation of a bench scale activated sludge unit and an extended aeration pilot plant. With accumulated data as the basis, a preliminary biological treatment system design was prepared. The proposed full scale design required intermediate facilities for oil removal, two 369,000 gallon aeration basins, final clarifiers, an anaerobic digester, and both biological and oily sludge dewatering facilities. 230
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197425 |
Title | Treatment of refinery wastewater using filtration and carbon adsorption |
Author | McCrodden, B. A. |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 230-244 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-04 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page230 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatment of Refinery Wastewater Using Filtration and Carbon Adsorption B.A. McCRODDEN, Conservation Engineer BP Oil Incorporated Marcus Hook, Penn«vlvania 19061 INTRODUCTION A 2.2 MGD filtration carbon adsorption Wastewater Treatment Plant, placed in operation at the Marcus Hook Refinery of BP Oil Corporation, a subsidiary of the Standard Oil Company (Ohio), in March, 1973, has demonstrated overall removals of 76, 89, 42, 38, and 39 percent reduction for suspended solids, oil, first stage ultimate oxygen demand (FSUOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and phenol, respectively. The 105,000 BPD Class B Refinery, located in southeastern Pennsylvania, discharges its effluent waters into the Delaware River. In 1961, the Delaware Estuary became the subject of an intensive study by the then U.S. Public Health Service. The Delaware Estuary Comprehensive Study (DECS) served as a basis for a determination by the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) that the 1964 discharge loads to the Estuary exceeded its assimilative capacity. Subsequently, stream quality objectives were established and the Estuary divided into six zones. The total first stage ultimate oxygen demand permitted to be discharged without violating these objectives was determined for each zone from base data developed by the DECS and its application of a mathematical model. Under thedoctrine of equitable apportionment, each individual discharger to a zone received an allocation based upon the concept of equal percentage of raw waste reduction in that zone. The Refinery's measured raw waste load was 24,650 pounds per day FSUOD. Application of an 89.25 zone percent reduction led to an overall discharge allocation of 2,650 pounds per day FSUOD. This allocation includes the net contribution from the process wastewater and once through cooling water streams. An additional Delaware River Basin Commission requirement is the secondary treatment of all process wastewater streams. Secondary treatment for zone four of the Estuary is defined as 89.25 percent FSUOD reduction. In 1969 a compliance schedule of 48 months was established. The initial effort toward achieving compliance was the evaluation of the existing API oil-water-solids Separator, through which all process wastewater flow is directed. Monitoring of API Separator influent and effluent FSUOD determined an average of 68 percent removal, far below the DRBC's required 89.25 percent for process wastewater streams. Accordingly, a project to determine the treatability of the API Separator effluent, and a project to reduce the API Separator's hydraulic loading were undertaken. The latter project had as its basis an in- plant water use survey which concluded that a reduction in process wastewater flow to the API Separator could be accomplished by installation of a brine cooler; replacement of barometric condensers with surface condensers; segregation of sanitary wastes from the process wastewater stream; and further segregation of oily water and once through cooling water streams. The results of this project are evidenced by a reduction in the hydraulic loading from 3,750 to 1,700 gpm, Treatability of the API Separator effluent was investigated through the operation of a bench scale activated sludge unit and an extended aeration pilot plant. With accumulated data as the basis, a preliminary biological treatment system design was prepared. The proposed full scale design required intermediate facilities for oil removal, two 369,000 gallon aeration basins, final clarifiers, an anaerobic digester, and both biological and oily sludge dewatering facilities. 230 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page230