page176 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Indiana's Industrial Effluent Monitoring Program Before and After the NPDES Permit Program PATRICK L. STEVENS, Acting Chief SAMUEL R. VIA, Engineer Industrial Wastes Section Division of Water Pollution Control Indiana State Board of Health Indianapolis, Indiana 46206 INTRODUCTION As Indiana's Industrial Water Pollution Abatement Programs began toexpand during the early 60's and more industries began to install more numerous and complex wastewater treatment systems there evolved a definite need from both the regulatory standpoint and operational standpoint to expand its effluent monitoring program. In the early 1960's approximately 35 major industries were submitting effluent monitoringdata on a voluntary basis. The need of the regulatory agency (Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board) was to create a means for being able to observe the day-to-day operations of a particular wastewater treatment plant and to collect data to assist in our water quality monitoring programs. Such a program would also allow the Board to receive data without the expenditure of either manpower or laboratory cost, neither of which were in abundance. This type of program also proved to be beneficial to the industries and became an essential necessity since the data allowed the plant operators to run the treatment facilities more efficiently and minimize operating costs. Many industries were quite surprised at the fluctuations in influent and effluent data and as a result many in-house corrections were made because of the data generated from the monitoring program. By 1966 the number of industries reporting voluntarily had increased to about 75. In general these industries were the major industries in northwest Indiana plus a few large industries in other areas of the State. The parameters that were reported were essentially those that could substantially define the character of the wastewater. For instance flow was reported in most cases as was suspended solids and pH. Oil refineries also reported ammonia, phenol, oil and grease, BOD, COD, sulfides, etc. Some chemical plants reported sulfates, phosphates, BOD, COD, suspended solids, oil and grease while others reported total dissolved solids, BOD, COD, oil and grease in addition to flow, pH and suspended solids. The frequency of monitoring was daily and less often if the parameter was not an essential control parameter. In 1965 the Division of Water Pollution Control of the Indiana State Board of Health conducted an extensive survey of all industries in Lake County. Seventeen parameters were analyzed in the laboratory to define future monitoring requirements. This action was the real forerunner to future monitoring programs on mass scale. REGULATION SPC 11 By 1970 the number of industries with waste treatment systems that were reporting their effluent data was considerably less than the total number of treatment systems in existence. By this time Indiana had about run the gamut of those industries that were volunatrily developing a monitoring program. It, therefore, became obvious that the monitoring program should be mandatory. It was determined that the State could be more effective in its request for monthly reporting if there was a regulation to require such submissions and on March 3, 1971. Regulation SPC-11 was promulgated (See Table I). 176
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197419 |
Title | Indiana's industrial effluent monitoring program before and after the NPDES permit program |
Author |
Stevens, Patrick L. Via, Samuel R. |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 176-183 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-04 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page176 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Indiana's Industrial Effluent Monitoring Program Before and After the NPDES Permit Program PATRICK L. STEVENS, Acting Chief SAMUEL R. VIA, Engineer Industrial Wastes Section Division of Water Pollution Control Indiana State Board of Health Indianapolis, Indiana 46206 INTRODUCTION As Indiana's Industrial Water Pollution Abatement Programs began toexpand during the early 60's and more industries began to install more numerous and complex wastewater treatment systems there evolved a definite need from both the regulatory standpoint and operational standpoint to expand its effluent monitoring program. In the early 1960's approximately 35 major industries were submitting effluent monitoringdata on a voluntary basis. The need of the regulatory agency (Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board) was to create a means for being able to observe the day-to-day operations of a particular wastewater treatment plant and to collect data to assist in our water quality monitoring programs. Such a program would also allow the Board to receive data without the expenditure of either manpower or laboratory cost, neither of which were in abundance. This type of program also proved to be beneficial to the industries and became an essential necessity since the data allowed the plant operators to run the treatment facilities more efficiently and minimize operating costs. Many industries were quite surprised at the fluctuations in influent and effluent data and as a result many in-house corrections were made because of the data generated from the monitoring program. By 1966 the number of industries reporting voluntarily had increased to about 75. In general these industries were the major industries in northwest Indiana plus a few large industries in other areas of the State. The parameters that were reported were essentially those that could substantially define the character of the wastewater. For instance flow was reported in most cases as was suspended solids and pH. Oil refineries also reported ammonia, phenol, oil and grease, BOD, COD, sulfides, etc. Some chemical plants reported sulfates, phosphates, BOD, COD, suspended solids, oil and grease while others reported total dissolved solids, BOD, COD, oil and grease in addition to flow, pH and suspended solids. The frequency of monitoring was daily and less often if the parameter was not an essential control parameter. In 1965 the Division of Water Pollution Control of the Indiana State Board of Health conducted an extensive survey of all industries in Lake County. Seventeen parameters were analyzed in the laboratory to define future monitoring requirements. This action was the real forerunner to future monitoring programs on mass scale. REGULATION SPC 11 By 1970 the number of industries with waste treatment systems that were reporting their effluent data was considerably less than the total number of treatment systems in existence. By this time Indiana had about run the gamut of those industries that were volunatrily developing a monitoring program. It, therefore, became obvious that the monitoring program should be mandatory. It was determined that the State could be more effective in its request for monthly reporting if there was a regulation to require such submissions and on March 3, 1971. Regulation SPC-11 was promulgated (See Table I). 176 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page176