page081 |
Previous | 1 of 13 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Foam Separation of Powdered Activated Carbon PAUL L. BISHOP, Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department University of New Hampshire Durham, New Hampshire 03824 GREGORY D. BOARD MAN, Graduate Student Civil Engineering Department University of Maine Orono, Maine 04473 INTRODUCTION An important development in wastewater treatment recently has been an increased interest in the use of activated carbon to remove organics. In addition to adsorbing soluble and often refractory organics, granular carbon beds also serve as filters and provide a media for biological degradation. Knowledge of the applicability of activated carbon has been well established for nearly a century; however, limitations have been placed on the use of powdered carbon forms due to the difficulty encountered in separating them from solution and in regeneration. Hence, granular forms have been principally used to adsorb organic and inorganic materials, color and toxic matter. Ironically, powdered carbon is less costly to manufacture, offers more surface, and distributes more easily and uniformly in solutions, thereby providing greater removals and more rapid equilibrium. In order for powdered activated carbon to become more universally acceptable, better means for removal and regeneration will be necessary. This paper will consider foam separation as one method for removal and recovery of the carbon. Foam separation is a technique whereby bubble adsorption is used as a means of separation. In general, there are two types of solute systems which lend themselves to foam separation. The first is characterized by solutes which are inherently surface active. Examples of these are proteins, dyes and detergents. The second class is comprised of those materials which are not naturally surface active, but which may be rendered so through the addition of a surfactant. Powdered activated carbon would be in this latter category. Grieves, etal( 1,2, 3,4, 5) have investigated foam separation for clarification of water. Foam separation was initiated by addition of a cationic surfactant (quarternary ammonium salt) which adsorbed at the surfaces of the negatively charged, colloidal particles causing turbidity in the water. The particles were then floated to the water surface by aeration and attachment of the particles to diffused or precipitated air bubbles. With this procedure, the turbidity could be reduced from about 250 Jackson Turbidity Units to about 4 JTU. Approximately 2 percent of the feed water was lost with the foam. Foam separation of domestic wastewater has also been investigated (6, 7, 8, 9). Removals of ABS and COD were generally in the area of 50 percent. Little or no removal of dissolved materials occurred. Past efforts to separate activated carbon from water have been limited to batch runs (10, 11, 12). These studies did show promise, however. They showed that at pH 7, carbon in suspension could be reduced from as much as 800 mg/1 to 24 mg/1 in 10 minutes with the addition of 0.37 mM EHDA-Br (ethylhexadecyldimethylammonium bromide), a cationic surfactant. 81
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197411 |
Title | Foam separation of powdered activated carbon |
Author |
Bishop, Paul L. Boardman, Gregory D. |
Date of Original | 1974 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 29th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,24462 |
Extent of Original | p. 81-93 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 145 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-04 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page081 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Foam Separation of Powdered Activated Carbon PAUL L. BISHOP, Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department University of New Hampshire Durham, New Hampshire 03824 GREGORY D. BOARD MAN, Graduate Student Civil Engineering Department University of Maine Orono, Maine 04473 INTRODUCTION An important development in wastewater treatment recently has been an increased interest in the use of activated carbon to remove organics. In addition to adsorbing soluble and often refractory organics, granular carbon beds also serve as filters and provide a media for biological degradation. Knowledge of the applicability of activated carbon has been well established for nearly a century; however, limitations have been placed on the use of powdered carbon forms due to the difficulty encountered in separating them from solution and in regeneration. Hence, granular forms have been principally used to adsorb organic and inorganic materials, color and toxic matter. Ironically, powdered carbon is less costly to manufacture, offers more surface, and distributes more easily and uniformly in solutions, thereby providing greater removals and more rapid equilibrium. In order for powdered activated carbon to become more universally acceptable, better means for removal and regeneration will be necessary. This paper will consider foam separation as one method for removal and recovery of the carbon. Foam separation is a technique whereby bubble adsorption is used as a means of separation. In general, there are two types of solute systems which lend themselves to foam separation. The first is characterized by solutes which are inherently surface active. Examples of these are proteins, dyes and detergents. The second class is comprised of those materials which are not naturally surface active, but which may be rendered so through the addition of a surfactant. Powdered activated carbon would be in this latter category. Grieves, etal( 1,2, 3,4, 5) have investigated foam separation for clarification of water. Foam separation was initiated by addition of a cationic surfactant (quarternary ammonium salt) which adsorbed at the surfaces of the negatively charged, colloidal particles causing turbidity in the water. The particles were then floated to the water surface by aeration and attachment of the particles to diffused or precipitated air bubbles. With this procedure, the turbidity could be reduced from about 250 Jackson Turbidity Units to about 4 JTU. Approximately 2 percent of the feed water was lost with the foam. Foam separation of domestic wastewater has also been investigated (6, 7, 8, 9). Removals of ABS and COD were generally in the area of 50 percent. Little or no removal of dissolved materials occurred. Past efforts to separate activated carbon from water have been limited to batch runs (10, 11, 12). These studies did show promise, however. They showed that at pH 7, carbon in suspension could be reduced from as much as 800 mg/1 to 24 mg/1 in 10 minutes with the addition of 0.37 mM EHDA-Br (ethylhexadecyldimethylammonium bromide), a cationic surfactant. 81 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page081