page 688 |
Previous | 1 of 25 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatment of Steel Drum Processing Wastewater RILEY N. KINMAN, Associate Professor JACK MUSTERMAN, Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 PAUL ARELL, Engineer U.S. Public Health Service Denver, Colorado INTRODUCTION The steel drum reconditioning industry in this country is 40 years old and has done much to conserve steel and to minimize the solid waste disposal problem caused by used drums. Recycling is the reason for existence of the industry. An 18 gauge, 55 gallon steel drum can be recycled up to 15 times. In 1968, 20 million new drums were manufactured, and 45 million drums were reconditioned. This permitted the recycle of one million tons of steel (1). The industry faces problems of air and water pollution because of the trend of the drum manufacturer to produce a thin-walled, non-reconditionabledrum. Liquid wastes generated contain residues of materials originally in the drums (approximately 5 pounds per drum), a sodium hydroxide cleaning solution, detergents used in the cleaning solution, and sanitary sewage from the plant. Residues left in a drum may be anything which can be shipped and stored in 55 gallon steel drums including oils, solvents, paint, varnish, ink, dyes, adhesives, acids, alkalies, antifreeze, resins, detergents, wax, honey, and even tomato paste. The objectives of this work were to: 1) Characterize drum reconditioning wastewater; 2) Develop a physical-chemical tertiary treatment method for this wastewater; 3) Evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment method on a bench pilot plant scale; 4) Determine the treatability of this wastewater by an aerobic biological process; 5) Evaluate the effects of various pretreatments on a completely mixed activated sludge system on bench scale; and 6) Develop cost estimates for application of the physical-chemical treatment process selected. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRUM PROCESSING OPERATION Two general processes are used for recondition of steel drums. One is called the open head process and the other used for closed head drums is called the closed head process. A flow diagram for both types of processes is shown in Figure 1. Two types of wash are available, but most operators use an alkaline wash system rather than an acid wash. Liquid wastes contain residues of materials originally in the drums (approximately five pounds per drum), a caustic soda cleaning solution, iron fillings from the blasting operation, industrial detergents, and a small volume of sanitary sewage from the plant. Drum residues include a wide variety of oils, hydraulic fluids, paint, varnish, solvents, dyes, coating materials, detergents, wax, foodstuffs and anything else which can be shipped or stored in 55 gallon steel drums. The open head process is essentially a dry one except for the upending operation, which dislodges the drum residue. Painting causes a unique wastewater problem whenever the paint pits are washed during cleanup. The closed head process is a wet process and contributes most of the waste stream. Preflush and the washing operation transport the drum residue into the wastewater stream. Chaining in a caustic and detergent bath loosens the remaining residue which is dumped at the up ender. Overflow from the cleaning solution 688
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197360 |
Title | Treatment of steel drum processing wastewater |
Author |
Kinman, Riley N. Musterman, Jack Arell, Paul |
Date of Original | 1973 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 28th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,23197 |
Extent of Original | p. 688-712 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 142 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 688 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatment of Steel Drum Processing Wastewater RILEY N. KINMAN, Associate Professor JACK MUSTERMAN, Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 PAUL ARELL, Engineer U.S. Public Health Service Denver, Colorado INTRODUCTION The steel drum reconditioning industry in this country is 40 years old and has done much to conserve steel and to minimize the solid waste disposal problem caused by used drums. Recycling is the reason for existence of the industry. An 18 gauge, 55 gallon steel drum can be recycled up to 15 times. In 1968, 20 million new drums were manufactured, and 45 million drums were reconditioned. This permitted the recycle of one million tons of steel (1). The industry faces problems of air and water pollution because of the trend of the drum manufacturer to produce a thin-walled, non-reconditionabledrum. Liquid wastes generated contain residues of materials originally in the drums (approximately 5 pounds per drum), a sodium hydroxide cleaning solution, detergents used in the cleaning solution, and sanitary sewage from the plant. Residues left in a drum may be anything which can be shipped and stored in 55 gallon steel drums including oils, solvents, paint, varnish, ink, dyes, adhesives, acids, alkalies, antifreeze, resins, detergents, wax, honey, and even tomato paste. The objectives of this work were to: 1) Characterize drum reconditioning wastewater; 2) Develop a physical-chemical tertiary treatment method for this wastewater; 3) Evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment method on a bench pilot plant scale; 4) Determine the treatability of this wastewater by an aerobic biological process; 5) Evaluate the effects of various pretreatments on a completely mixed activated sludge system on bench scale; and 6) Develop cost estimates for application of the physical-chemical treatment process selected. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRUM PROCESSING OPERATION Two general processes are used for recondition of steel drums. One is called the open head process and the other used for closed head drums is called the closed head process. A flow diagram for both types of processes is shown in Figure 1. Two types of wash are available, but most operators use an alkaline wash system rather than an acid wash. Liquid wastes contain residues of materials originally in the drums (approximately five pounds per drum), a caustic soda cleaning solution, iron fillings from the blasting operation, industrial detergents, and a small volume of sanitary sewage from the plant. Drum residues include a wide variety of oils, hydraulic fluids, paint, varnish, solvents, dyes, coating materials, detergents, wax, foodstuffs and anything else which can be shipped or stored in 55 gallon steel drums. The open head process is essentially a dry one except for the upending operation, which dislodges the drum residue. Painting causes a unique wastewater problem whenever the paint pits are washed during cleanup. The closed head process is a wet process and contributes most of the waste stream. Preflush and the washing operation transport the drum residue into the wastewater stream. Chaining in a caustic and detergent bath loosens the remaining residue which is dumped at the up ender. Overflow from the cleaning solution 688 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 688