page1089 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Water Pollution Problems Associated with Control of Stack Gas Emission CLIFFORD J. LEWIS, Environmental Consultant The National Lime Association Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this discussion is to focus attention on the water pollution potential involved in the clean up of stack gases. The water pollution which could result from this effort is considerable. The environmental program should evaluate the water pollution potential of any stack gas clean up program. Technologies for water preservation are well advanced while the technologies for air pollution abatement are yet largely in the development stage thus allowing time, though relatively short, for all concerned to plan for the impact of stack gas clean up on our domestic water resources. The relationship between the preservation and improvement of water resources and the improvement of stack gas emission resides in the fact that for the control of stack gas emission most, if not all, presently developing technology scrubs the stack gas with an aqueous media which, subsequently, may be a potential water pollutant. The definition of pollutant as used in this discussion is based on standards as presently suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S. Government. An absolute definition is not implied since the concept of both air and water pollution is too intricately woven into our changing societal, political and economic structure. For example, an advocate of environmental clean up, after asking what he could do to further the cause, became disenchanted when it was suggested that he surrender his automobile keys. SOURCES OF STACK GAS POLLUTANTS There are many sources of stack gas emission which readily qualify as atmospheric pollutants under EPA recommended standards. These range from garbage incinerators, saw dust burners, and various chemical manufacturing operations to smelters and coal burning power plants. This discussion will confine itself to the water pollution potential resulting from the clean up of gases from metallurgical smelters and coal burning power plants. In 1969, approximately 500 million tons of coal averaging about 2 percent sulfur were consumed in the United States. Of this amount, about 61 percent was consumed by coal burning power plants. This calculates to around 12,000,000 tons of sulfur dioxide discharged into the atmosphere. In addition, if it is assumed that this coal averaged 10 percent ash, of which 90 percent was removed by dry precipitators, then at least 3,000,000 tons of fly ash as particulate matter were available for atmospheric discharge. In the case of metallurgical smelters, the copper industry alone processed approximately 2,300,000 tons of copper sulfide concentrates during 1969 representing about the same quantity of sulfur dioxide for emission into the atmosphere. This is a generalization without correction for sulfuric acid production and it is intended only to reflect the magnitude of the potential water pollution. When the pollutants in the stack gas of coal burning power plants are considered, it is common practice to speak in terms of particulate matter, oxides of nitrogen, sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide. However, this is only part of the story since coal being of an earthy nature may contain many elements which volatilizes in one form or another and report under the generalized heading of particulate matter. For example, many coals contain limestone which converts to quick lime during the firing process and ends up as alkalinity in the aqueous scrubbing medium. When smelter stack gases are considered, it is usually in 1089
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197293 |
Title | Water pollution problems associated with control of stack gas emission |
Author | Lewis, Clifford J. |
Date of Original | 1972 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,20246 |
Extent of Original | p. 1089-1092 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 141 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-08 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page1089 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Water Pollution Problems Associated with Control of Stack Gas Emission CLIFFORD J. LEWIS, Environmental Consultant The National Lime Association Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this discussion is to focus attention on the water pollution potential involved in the clean up of stack gases. The water pollution which could result from this effort is considerable. The environmental program should evaluate the water pollution potential of any stack gas clean up program. Technologies for water preservation are well advanced while the technologies for air pollution abatement are yet largely in the development stage thus allowing time, though relatively short, for all concerned to plan for the impact of stack gas clean up on our domestic water resources. The relationship between the preservation and improvement of water resources and the improvement of stack gas emission resides in the fact that for the control of stack gas emission most, if not all, presently developing technology scrubs the stack gas with an aqueous media which, subsequently, may be a potential water pollutant. The definition of pollutant as used in this discussion is based on standards as presently suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S. Government. An absolute definition is not implied since the concept of both air and water pollution is too intricately woven into our changing societal, political and economic structure. For example, an advocate of environmental clean up, after asking what he could do to further the cause, became disenchanted when it was suggested that he surrender his automobile keys. SOURCES OF STACK GAS POLLUTANTS There are many sources of stack gas emission which readily qualify as atmospheric pollutants under EPA recommended standards. These range from garbage incinerators, saw dust burners, and various chemical manufacturing operations to smelters and coal burning power plants. This discussion will confine itself to the water pollution potential resulting from the clean up of gases from metallurgical smelters and coal burning power plants. In 1969, approximately 500 million tons of coal averaging about 2 percent sulfur were consumed in the United States. Of this amount, about 61 percent was consumed by coal burning power plants. This calculates to around 12,000,000 tons of sulfur dioxide discharged into the atmosphere. In addition, if it is assumed that this coal averaged 10 percent ash, of which 90 percent was removed by dry precipitators, then at least 3,000,000 tons of fly ash as particulate matter were available for atmospheric discharge. In the case of metallurgical smelters, the copper industry alone processed approximately 2,300,000 tons of copper sulfide concentrates during 1969 representing about the same quantity of sulfur dioxide for emission into the atmosphere. This is a generalization without correction for sulfuric acid production and it is intended only to reflect the magnitude of the potential water pollution. When the pollutants in the stack gas of coal burning power plants are considered, it is common practice to speak in terms of particulate matter, oxides of nitrogen, sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide. However, this is only part of the story since coal being of an earthy nature may contain many elements which volatilizes in one form or another and report under the generalized heading of particulate matter. For example, many coals contain limestone which converts to quick lime during the firing process and ends up as alkalinity in the aqueous scrubbing medium. When smelter stack gases are considered, it is usually in 1089 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page1089