page0777 |
Previous | 1 of 15 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
An Effluent Study of a Fresh Water Fish Processing Plant M. J. RIDDLE, Project Engineer Food and Allied Industries Division Water Pollution Control Directorate Environmental Protection Service Department of Environment Ottawa, Canada K. L. MURPHY, Professor Department of Chemical Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada INTRODUCTION Current methods of processing fish require the use of considerable quantities of water for: cleaning the fish, transporting the waste material, plant clean up, and for use in deodorizers. The discharge of this waste water directly into adjacent lakes and rivers solved the disposal problem of the fish processors for many years. In the last ten years the expansion ofthe fish processing industry and the improvement ofthe by-product recovery techniques made it economical to remove the large solid material from the waste water by screening. The screenings were processed, the resulting fish meal was sold as animal feed, but the remaining waste water still has been discharged to receiving waters. The characterization of wastes from various types offish plants has been the subject of a number of studies. These have been reviewed by Riddle (1) but almost all the plants handled seafood as opposed to freshwater fish. Further the information on treatment was mainly confined to screening and flotation, in other words physical treatment, of waste from seafood processing plants. There is very little information available on biological treatment as applied to any type of fish wastes. The Canadian Department of the Environment with the cooperation of the Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, agreed to undertake a study to: 1) characterize the effluent from a freshwater fish processing plant, and 2) determine its biological treatability. FRESHWATER FISH PROCESSING WASTES Omstead Fisheries, 1961, Limited, of Wheatley, Ontario, was chosen for study. Omstead Fisheries processed some 34 million pounds of perch and smelt in 1969. The plant is situated about one mile south of the village of Wheatley, Ontario, and some twenty miles south east of Windsor, on the Lake Erie shoreline. The various steps for processing perch and smelt are shown on Figure 1. Perch are normally filleted whereas smelt are eviserated. As the processing operations are carried out by machine the company attempts to keep a steady flow of fish through the processing machines. If the supply of perch is low, hand filleting is employed, while smelt processing is discontinued until the supply is replenished. Following processing the fish are placed on trays in large boxes for freezing and eventually packaged in small boxes for the consumer market. The offal from the fish processing plant is transported by auger to the fish meal plant (Figure I), where it is processed into animal feed and high grade fish oil. Only washdown water is discharged from the fish meal plant. As many fish meal plants do not recover 777
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197270 |
Title | Effluent study of a fresh water fish processing plant |
Author |
Riddle, M. J. Murphy, K. L. |
Date of Original | 1972 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,20246 |
Extent of Original | p. 777-791 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 141 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-08 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page0777 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | An Effluent Study of a Fresh Water Fish Processing Plant M. J. RIDDLE, Project Engineer Food and Allied Industries Division Water Pollution Control Directorate Environmental Protection Service Department of Environment Ottawa, Canada K. L. MURPHY, Professor Department of Chemical Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada INTRODUCTION Current methods of processing fish require the use of considerable quantities of water for: cleaning the fish, transporting the waste material, plant clean up, and for use in deodorizers. The discharge of this waste water directly into adjacent lakes and rivers solved the disposal problem of the fish processors for many years. In the last ten years the expansion ofthe fish processing industry and the improvement ofthe by-product recovery techniques made it economical to remove the large solid material from the waste water by screening. The screenings were processed, the resulting fish meal was sold as animal feed, but the remaining waste water still has been discharged to receiving waters. The characterization of wastes from various types offish plants has been the subject of a number of studies. These have been reviewed by Riddle (1) but almost all the plants handled seafood as opposed to freshwater fish. Further the information on treatment was mainly confined to screening and flotation, in other words physical treatment, of waste from seafood processing plants. There is very little information available on biological treatment as applied to any type of fish wastes. The Canadian Department of the Environment with the cooperation of the Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, agreed to undertake a study to: 1) characterize the effluent from a freshwater fish processing plant, and 2) determine its biological treatability. FRESHWATER FISH PROCESSING WASTES Omstead Fisheries, 1961, Limited, of Wheatley, Ontario, was chosen for study. Omstead Fisheries processed some 34 million pounds of perch and smelt in 1969. The plant is situated about one mile south of the village of Wheatley, Ontario, and some twenty miles south east of Windsor, on the Lake Erie shoreline. The various steps for processing perch and smelt are shown on Figure 1. Perch are normally filleted whereas smelt are eviserated. As the processing operations are carried out by machine the company attempts to keep a steady flow of fish through the processing machines. If the supply of perch is low, hand filleting is employed, while smelt processing is discontinued until the supply is replenished. Following processing the fish are placed on trays in large boxes for freezing and eventually packaged in small boxes for the consumer market. The offal from the fish processing plant is transported by auger to the fish meal plant (Figure I), where it is processed into animal feed and high grade fish oil. Only washdown water is discharged from the fish meal plant. As many fish meal plants do not recover 777 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page0777