page0095 |
Previous | 1 of 23 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Increasing Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity and Efficiency By Chemical Addition C. MICHAEL ROBSON, Manager GARY L. NICKERSON, Project Engineer JEFFREY L. VAN ATTEN, Project Engineer Engineering-Science, Inc. Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION The County of Fairfax, Virginia presently operates four wastewater treatment plants which discharge directly to the Potomac River or immediate estuarian streams (Figure 1). Three of these plants, Westgate, Little Hunting Creek, and Dogue Creek, were much criticized by conservation groups and other interested citizens in early 1970 for providing inadequate treatment and thus contributing to the pollution of the Potomac River. In June 1970, Fairfax County submitted a detailed report to the Virginia State Water Control Board (VSWCB) which outlined interim improvements to increase the treatment capacities of the three plants (1). Further, a long range program was initiated at this time which provided for terminating operations at Little Hunting and Dogue Creek plants by May 1, 1972, and at the Westgate plant by July 1, 1973. A large part of the interim improvement program relied on the incorporation of chemical treatment. This paper describes the methods by which Fairfax was able to significantly increase the treatment capacity and efficiency of the Westgate, Little Hunting Creek and Dogue Creek wastewater treatment plants. The description is divided into three main parts: 1) modifications and results achieved at the Westgate Plant that provided primary level wastewater treatment; 2) modifications and results at the two County biofiltration plants, Little Hunting Creek and Dogue Creek; and 3) sludge handling problems which accompanied the chemical addition modifications. WESTGATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT A major portion of Fairfax County's pollution abatement program was concerned with increasing the capacity of the Westgate Wastewater Treatment Plant, which was constructed in 1954 to provide an intermediate level of treatment for 8 million gallons per day(MGD) of sewage. The original plant (Figure 2), a pioneering effort on the Potomac for its day, was designed to achieve treatment efficiencies in excess of 50 percent Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) removal. Liquid stream treatment was accomplished in two bays of a single rectangular tank, baffled into three zones: primary settling, aeration and final settling (Figure 3). Sludge digestion, dewatering, drying and pelletizing equipment was installed as part of the original construction, but only the sludge dewatering equipment has been used for the majority of the operational life of the plant. A sludge pumping station with two 25,000 gallon sludge decanting chambers was later constructed for use in conjunction with the two vacuum filters to dewater raw primary sludge. The dewatered sludge cake was then hauled to a landfill in 10 cubic yard "load-lugger" containers. A description of the main treatment components of the original plant is given in Table I. The average daily flow at Westgate, by early 1970, had increased to 12 MGD, and BOD5 removals, at times, dropped as low as 35 percent. A crash program of laboratory and plant scale testing was conducted in June and July 1970 to determine the effectiveness of chemical treatment at the Westgate facility. The results of the subsequent plant scale trial, initiated in July using temporary facilities, were sufficient to cause the County officials to authorize continued chemical addition by using temporary facilities until the permanent equipment could be installed (2). 95
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197208 |
Title | Increasing wastewater treatment plant capacity and efficiency by chemical addition |
Author |
Robson, C. Michael Nickerson, Gary L. Van Atten, Jeffrey L. |
Date of Original | 1972 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,20246 |
Extent of Original | p. 95-117 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 141 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-08 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page0095 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Increasing Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity and Efficiency By Chemical Addition C. MICHAEL ROBSON, Manager GARY L. NICKERSON, Project Engineer JEFFREY L. VAN ATTEN, Project Engineer Engineering-Science, Inc. Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION The County of Fairfax, Virginia presently operates four wastewater treatment plants which discharge directly to the Potomac River or immediate estuarian streams (Figure 1). Three of these plants, Westgate, Little Hunting Creek, and Dogue Creek, were much criticized by conservation groups and other interested citizens in early 1970 for providing inadequate treatment and thus contributing to the pollution of the Potomac River. In June 1970, Fairfax County submitted a detailed report to the Virginia State Water Control Board (VSWCB) which outlined interim improvements to increase the treatment capacities of the three plants (1). Further, a long range program was initiated at this time which provided for terminating operations at Little Hunting and Dogue Creek plants by May 1, 1972, and at the Westgate plant by July 1, 1973. A large part of the interim improvement program relied on the incorporation of chemical treatment. This paper describes the methods by which Fairfax was able to significantly increase the treatment capacity and efficiency of the Westgate, Little Hunting Creek and Dogue Creek wastewater treatment plants. The description is divided into three main parts: 1) modifications and results achieved at the Westgate Plant that provided primary level wastewater treatment; 2) modifications and results at the two County biofiltration plants, Little Hunting Creek and Dogue Creek; and 3) sludge handling problems which accompanied the chemical addition modifications. WESTGATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT A major portion of Fairfax County's pollution abatement program was concerned with increasing the capacity of the Westgate Wastewater Treatment Plant, which was constructed in 1954 to provide an intermediate level of treatment for 8 million gallons per day(MGD) of sewage. The original plant (Figure 2), a pioneering effort on the Potomac for its day, was designed to achieve treatment efficiencies in excess of 50 percent Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) removal. Liquid stream treatment was accomplished in two bays of a single rectangular tank, baffled into three zones: primary settling, aeration and final settling (Figure 3). Sludge digestion, dewatering, drying and pelletizing equipment was installed as part of the original construction, but only the sludge dewatering equipment has been used for the majority of the operational life of the plant. A sludge pumping station with two 25,000 gallon sludge decanting chambers was later constructed for use in conjunction with the two vacuum filters to dewater raw primary sludge. The dewatered sludge cake was then hauled to a landfill in 10 cubic yard "load-lugger" containers. A description of the main treatment components of the original plant is given in Table I. The average daily flow at Westgate, by early 1970, had increased to 12 MGD, and BOD5 removals, at times, dropped as low as 35 percent. A crash program of laboratory and plant scale testing was conducted in June and July 1970 to determine the effectiveness of chemical treatment at the Westgate facility. The results of the subsequent plant scale trial, initiated in July using temporary facilities, were sufficient to cause the County officials to authorize continued chemical addition by using temporary facilities until the permanent equipment could be installed (2). 95 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page0095