page0067 |
Previous | 1 of 13 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Fundamentals of Tube Settler Design W. A. BEACH, Research Associate Permutit Research Center Princeton, New Jersey INTRODUCTION Gravity separation of solids from a liquid is one of the most important processes in water and waste treatment. Hazen first recognized the need for short settling distances and suggested the horizontal plate clarifier in 1904111. For the next 50 years, various attempts were made to market devices of this type, but none were very successful due to poor flow distribution and the difficulty of sludge removal. In 1946 Camp reemphasized the great improvement that was possible and stressed the need for research and development in the field of sedimentation121. Finally, about 20 years later, Culp and his associates(31. began reporting on practical settling tubes featuring the low settling heights suggested by Hazen and Camp. In the past five years, some data have been published relating tube settler performance to tube depth and angle of inclination but relatively little data are available on the influence of other relevant parameters. This paper presents the results of tube settling tests on a wide range of cross sectional shapes, cross sectional sizes, tube lengths and angles of inclination. Tube performance was judged by measuring effluent turbidity at various flow rates when settling an alum-lime-kaolin floe. The first part of this paper will present a brief theoretical analysis of different types of settlers. To simplify this analysis, ideal settling of dilute, non-flocculating solids will be considered and density currents, wind currents, inlet and outlet influences will be ignored. VERTICAL CLARIFIER First consider settling rates in an up/low clarifier where product is removed from the top of the clarifier. Clearly, for acceptable results, the upward velocity of the fluid may be no greater than the settling velocity of the slowest settling particles that must be eliminated from the product. For most solids we deal with, including natural turbidity, alum floes and the like, these velocities set the limits for production rates for vertical clarifiers at one or at most two gallons of product per-minute per-square foot of clarifier surface area. HORIZONTAL CLARIFIER Next consider a particle settling in a horizontal clarifying device, as illustrated schematically in Figure 1. A particle carried forward by the velocity of the liquid flow must settle at a rate fast enough to reach the bottom before it reaches the end of the device. Thus in Figure 1 particles beginning at a point a must traverse some route lying between routes ab and ah'in order to settle before being ejected. If V is the velocity of the fluid, u the settling velocity of the particles, L the length of the horizontal settling device and d its depth, then particles at point a will settle to the bottom of the device only if V does not exceed t-(u) since V max. L or V max. - L ,. u d d 67
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197205 |
Title | Fundamentals of tube settler design |
Author | Beach, W. A. |
Date of Original | 1972 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,20246 |
Extent of Original | p. 67-79 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 141 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-08 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page0067 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Fundamentals of Tube Settler Design W. A. BEACH, Research Associate Permutit Research Center Princeton, New Jersey INTRODUCTION Gravity separation of solids from a liquid is one of the most important processes in water and waste treatment. Hazen first recognized the need for short settling distances and suggested the horizontal plate clarifier in 1904111. For the next 50 years, various attempts were made to market devices of this type, but none were very successful due to poor flow distribution and the difficulty of sludge removal. In 1946 Camp reemphasized the great improvement that was possible and stressed the need for research and development in the field of sedimentation121. Finally, about 20 years later, Culp and his associates(31. began reporting on practical settling tubes featuring the low settling heights suggested by Hazen and Camp. In the past five years, some data have been published relating tube settler performance to tube depth and angle of inclination but relatively little data are available on the influence of other relevant parameters. This paper presents the results of tube settling tests on a wide range of cross sectional shapes, cross sectional sizes, tube lengths and angles of inclination. Tube performance was judged by measuring effluent turbidity at various flow rates when settling an alum-lime-kaolin floe. The first part of this paper will present a brief theoretical analysis of different types of settlers. To simplify this analysis, ideal settling of dilute, non-flocculating solids will be considered and density currents, wind currents, inlet and outlet influences will be ignored. VERTICAL CLARIFIER First consider settling rates in an up/low clarifier where product is removed from the top of the clarifier. Clearly, for acceptable results, the upward velocity of the fluid may be no greater than the settling velocity of the slowest settling particles that must be eliminated from the product. For most solids we deal with, including natural turbidity, alum floes and the like, these velocities set the limits for production rates for vertical clarifiers at one or at most two gallons of product per-minute per-square foot of clarifier surface area. HORIZONTAL CLARIFIER Next consider a particle settling in a horizontal clarifying device, as illustrated schematically in Figure 1. A particle carried forward by the velocity of the liquid flow must settle at a rate fast enough to reach the bottom before it reaches the end of the device. Thus in Figure 1 particles beginning at a point a must traverse some route lying between routes ab and ah'in order to settle before being ejected. If V is the velocity of the fluid, u the settling velocity of the particles, L the length of the horizontal settling device and d its depth, then particles at point a will settle to the bottom of the device only if V does not exceed t-(u) since V max. L or V max. - L ,. u d d 67 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page0067