page 691 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
69 COST-EFFECTIVE TREATMENT BY AERATED POND CHEMICAL CLARIFICATION AND A WATER COOLING SYSTEM RECYCLING EFFLUENT AS MAKE-UP Noah Galil, Senior Lecturer Yael Levinsky, Research Engineer Menahem Rebhun, Professor Faculty of Civil Engineering Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Haifa 32000, Israel INTRODUCTION The study is based on the performance of a full scale industrial system, treating wastewater from a petrochemical complex. The final effluent quality requirements were determined by the fact that the effluent has to be recycled as make-up to the local water cooling system, replacing fresh water. At the primary stages, the treatment includes separation of "free" oil by API type separators and removal of emulsified oil by chemical flocculation and dissolved air flotation (DAF). After these stages of treatment, the effluent contains up to 50 mg/L oil, 500 mg/L COD, 220 mg/L BOD, 11 mg/L phenols and 16 mg/L ammonia as nitrogen (Table I). For improving the effluent quality a biological treatment process is necessary and for this purpose three alternatives have been studied and discussed by the authors: activated sludge, RBC and aerated ponds.1"3 Experimental results, based on pilot plant studies showed that activated sludge and RBC could provide efficient removals of biodegradable organic matter and nitrification; however, two major disadvantages have been reported: (a) both processes and especially the activated sludge, were sensitive to external disturbances, such as uncontrollable loads of pollutants, causing unstable effluent quality; (b) the capital investment was estimated as close to 6 million US dollars for each one of these processes and this was considered as too high by the management of the industrial complex. Table I. Effluent Quality After Different Treatment Stages Influent3 Combined Biotreatment Constituent Aerated Ponds Lime Clarific. WCS Blow Downb Suspended Solids Total 69 123 49 48 32 Ammonia as N 16 10 8.3 0.9 0.9 Hydrocarbons 48 26 3.6 4.8 2.5 COD Total Soluble 486 380 272 130 88 75 96 87 80 68 BOD Total Soluble 220 160 85 31 15 6 16 6 6 <5 Phenols 11 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 a After treatment b After additional by API and DAF. treatment by lime clarification. 48th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1993 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 691
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199369 |
Title | Cost-effective treatment by aerated pond chemical clarification and a water cooling system recycling effluent as make-up |
Author |
Galil, Noah I. Levinsky, Yael Rebhun, M. |
Date of Original | 1993 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 48th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,21159 |
Extent of Original | p. 691-698 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 691 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 69 COST-EFFECTIVE TREATMENT BY AERATED POND CHEMICAL CLARIFICATION AND A WATER COOLING SYSTEM RECYCLING EFFLUENT AS MAKE-UP Noah Galil, Senior Lecturer Yael Levinsky, Research Engineer Menahem Rebhun, Professor Faculty of Civil Engineering Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Haifa 32000, Israel INTRODUCTION The study is based on the performance of a full scale industrial system, treating wastewater from a petrochemical complex. The final effluent quality requirements were determined by the fact that the effluent has to be recycled as make-up to the local water cooling system, replacing fresh water. At the primary stages, the treatment includes separation of "free" oil by API type separators and removal of emulsified oil by chemical flocculation and dissolved air flotation (DAF). After these stages of treatment, the effluent contains up to 50 mg/L oil, 500 mg/L COD, 220 mg/L BOD, 11 mg/L phenols and 16 mg/L ammonia as nitrogen (Table I). For improving the effluent quality a biological treatment process is necessary and for this purpose three alternatives have been studied and discussed by the authors: activated sludge, RBC and aerated ponds.1"3 Experimental results, based on pilot plant studies showed that activated sludge and RBC could provide efficient removals of biodegradable organic matter and nitrification; however, two major disadvantages have been reported: (a) both processes and especially the activated sludge, were sensitive to external disturbances, such as uncontrollable loads of pollutants, causing unstable effluent quality; (b) the capital investment was estimated as close to 6 million US dollars for each one of these processes and this was considered as too high by the management of the industrial complex. Table I. Effluent Quality After Different Treatment Stages Influent3 Combined Biotreatment Constituent Aerated Ponds Lime Clarific. WCS Blow Downb Suspended Solids Total 69 123 49 48 32 Ammonia as N 16 10 8.3 0.9 0.9 Hydrocarbons 48 26 3.6 4.8 2.5 COD Total Soluble 486 380 272 130 88 75 96 87 80 68 BOD Total Soluble 220 160 85 31 15 6 16 6 6 <5 Phenols 11 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 a After treatment b After additional by API and DAF. treatment by lime clarification. 48th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1993 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 691 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 691