page015 |
Previous | 1 of 5 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
The 1948 Federal Stream-Pollution-Control Law Carl E. Schwob Sanitary Engineer Director Water Pollution Control Section Public Health Service Washington, D. C. The enactment of the Water Pollution Control Act on June 30, 1948, represents the culmination of efforts over a period of some years by the many groups interested in the prevention and control of water pollution. It represents a compromise between various groups which heretofore have been in disagreement on some of the points involved in the legislation. As a compromise it may prove to have some shortcomings; but, I believe, it contitutes an important first step in dealing with this increasingly grave problem on a nationwide and more effective basis. By the enactment of the new Water Pollution Control Act, Congress was not evidencing any intent that the federal government infringe upon the responsibilities or rights of the states. Section 1 clearly indicates that philosophy. The federal government, however, has some responsibilities in this field, as have the local units of government and the industries concerned. In short, the program contemplated by the new law is one in which all of us have a deep interest and concern and one which, therefore, requires our joint efforts and cooperation. The sponsors and supporters of the new law were convinced of this and indicated that we could never hope to cope with our water-pollution problems without such an effort and such cooperation. Success in dealing with our water- pollution problems will require comprehensive programs for attacking existing pollution and preventing new pollution. We cannot hope to carry out these programs without the cooperation of all parties concerned. This is, as I see it, the main theme of the new law and the precept upon which administration of the Public Health Service's functions will be based. Section 2 of the new Water Control Act leaves no room for question on this score. It states that the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service is to prepare or adopt comprehensive programs for the elimination or reduction of pollution and the improving of the sanitary condition of our waters, after careful investigation and in cooperation 15
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC194802 |
Title | 1948 federal stream-pollution-control law |
Author | Schwob, Carl E. |
Date of Original | 1948 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the fourth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=2061&REC=19 |
Extent of Original | p. 15-19 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-03 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page015 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | The 1948 Federal Stream-Pollution-Control Law Carl E. Schwob Sanitary Engineer Director Water Pollution Control Section Public Health Service Washington, D. C. The enactment of the Water Pollution Control Act on June 30, 1948, represents the culmination of efforts over a period of some years by the many groups interested in the prevention and control of water pollution. It represents a compromise between various groups which heretofore have been in disagreement on some of the points involved in the legislation. As a compromise it may prove to have some shortcomings; but, I believe, it contitutes an important first step in dealing with this increasingly grave problem on a nationwide and more effective basis. By the enactment of the new Water Pollution Control Act, Congress was not evidencing any intent that the federal government infringe upon the responsibilities or rights of the states. Section 1 clearly indicates that philosophy. The federal government, however, has some responsibilities in this field, as have the local units of government and the industries concerned. In short, the program contemplated by the new law is one in which all of us have a deep interest and concern and one which, therefore, requires our joint efforts and cooperation. The sponsors and supporters of the new law were convinced of this and indicated that we could never hope to cope with our water-pollution problems without such an effort and such cooperation. Success in dealing with our water- pollution problems will require comprehensive programs for attacking existing pollution and preventing new pollution. We cannot hope to carry out these programs without the cooperation of all parties concerned. This is, as I see it, the main theme of the new law and the precept upon which administration of the Public Health Service's functions will be based. Section 2 of the new Water Control Act leaves no room for question on this score. It states that the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service is to prepare or adopt comprehensive programs for the elimination or reduction of pollution and the improving of the sanitary condition of our waters, after careful investigation and in cooperation 15 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page015