page 503 |
Previous | 1 of 14 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
51 COMPARISON OF ADSORPTIVE AND NON-ADSORPTIVE BIOFILM CARRIERS IN BIOLOGICAL FLUIDIZED BED REACTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH BENZENE, TOLUENE AND XYLENE Xianda Zhao, Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 Jing Shi, Environmental Engineer Robert F. Hickey, Director Waste Treatment Technologies Michigan Biotechnology Institute Lansing, Michigan 48909 Thomas C. Voice, Associate Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 INTRODUCTION The contamination of groundwater by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is being reported with increasing frequency. More than 40% of US. population uses groundwater as a drinking water supply, often without any treatment other than disinfection. Groundwater contamination is thus a serious public health concern. Among the most common types of groundwater contamination are those resulting from petroleum products. This frequently produces elevated levels of benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTX) because these compounds are the most soluble and are poorly retarded by the soil matrix. The conventional approaches to remediation of BTX contaminated groundwater involve either liquid-phase adsorption by granular activated carbon (GAC) or air stripping. In these processes, the VOCs are simply transferred from one phase to another.1,2 Further treatment or disposal of the receiving phase is often required. Biological treatment of contaminated groundwater would appear to be a desirable alternative to such techniques. This approach has the potential to destroy the pollutant and is often less expensive than physical-chemical treatment. Biological processes are frequently perceived as being less stable than physical-chemical approaches, however, and thus are not always considered for groundwater treatment. The beneficial aspects of integrated biodegradation/adsorption systems were reported in the early work on the use of GAC for secondary and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater.3 In systems designed as adsorbers, it has been shown that biodegradation increases the period between GAC regeneration cycles.4"11 In biofilm systems, the use of GAC as a biomass carrier has been shown to provide for removal of compounds resistant to biodegradation.12'13 In a treatment process for groundwater contaminated with relatively low levels of volatile organic compounds, a biological activated carbon fluidized-bed reactor (BAC-FBR) system has been demonstrated to provide both the efficiency of biological removal and the positive effluent protection capability of activated carbon adsorption.14"16 Previous work in this laboratory compared the performance of adsorptive and non-adsorptive biofilm carriers in biological fluidized-bed reactors (BAC-FBR) for the treatment of groundwater contaminated with benzene, toluene and p-xylene.16 The results demonstrated that the BAC system functioned primarily as a biological reactor under steady-state conditions, but that the GAC carrier 48th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1993 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 503
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199351 |
Title | Comparison of adsorptive and non-adsorptive biofilm carriers in biological fluidized bed reactors for the treatment of groundwater contaminated with benzene, toluene and xylene |
Author |
Zhao, Xianda Shi, Jing Hickey, Robert F. Voice, Thomas C. |
Date of Original | 1993 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 48th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,21159 |
Extent of Original | p. 503-516 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 503 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 51 COMPARISON OF ADSORPTIVE AND NON-ADSORPTIVE BIOFILM CARRIERS IN BIOLOGICAL FLUIDIZED BED REACTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH BENZENE, TOLUENE AND XYLENE Xianda Zhao, Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 Jing Shi, Environmental Engineer Robert F. Hickey, Director Waste Treatment Technologies Michigan Biotechnology Institute Lansing, Michigan 48909 Thomas C. Voice, Associate Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 INTRODUCTION The contamination of groundwater by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is being reported with increasing frequency. More than 40% of US. population uses groundwater as a drinking water supply, often without any treatment other than disinfection. Groundwater contamination is thus a serious public health concern. Among the most common types of groundwater contamination are those resulting from petroleum products. This frequently produces elevated levels of benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTX) because these compounds are the most soluble and are poorly retarded by the soil matrix. The conventional approaches to remediation of BTX contaminated groundwater involve either liquid-phase adsorption by granular activated carbon (GAC) or air stripping. In these processes, the VOCs are simply transferred from one phase to another.1,2 Further treatment or disposal of the receiving phase is often required. Biological treatment of contaminated groundwater would appear to be a desirable alternative to such techniques. This approach has the potential to destroy the pollutant and is often less expensive than physical-chemical treatment. Biological processes are frequently perceived as being less stable than physical-chemical approaches, however, and thus are not always considered for groundwater treatment. The beneficial aspects of integrated biodegradation/adsorption systems were reported in the early work on the use of GAC for secondary and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater.3 In systems designed as adsorbers, it has been shown that biodegradation increases the period between GAC regeneration cycles.4"11 In biofilm systems, the use of GAC as a biomass carrier has been shown to provide for removal of compounds resistant to biodegradation.12'13 In a treatment process for groundwater contaminated with relatively low levels of volatile organic compounds, a biological activated carbon fluidized-bed reactor (BAC-FBR) system has been demonstrated to provide both the efficiency of biological removal and the positive effluent protection capability of activated carbon adsorption.14"16 Previous work in this laboratory compared the performance of adsorptive and non-adsorptive biofilm carriers in biological fluidized-bed reactors (BAC-FBR) for the treatment of groundwater contaminated with benzene, toluene and p-xylene.16 The results demonstrated that the BAC system functioned primarily as a biological reactor under steady-state conditions, but that the GAC carrier 48th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1993 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 503 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 503