page 169 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
17 EFFICIENCIES OF SOIL WASHING SOLUTIONS FOR THE REMEDIATION OF LEAD AND ORGANICALLY CONTAMINATED SOILS Steven R. Cline, Graduate Assistant Brian E. Reed, Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6101 Mark R. Matsumoto, Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, New York 14260 INTRODUCTION Heavy metals are often found in soils at high concentrations as a result of man's neglect for the environment. Unlike many organic pollutants that are subject to biodegradation, heavy metals will not degrade to harmless end products. Soil washing has recently become a popular ex-situ technique for remediating sites contaminated with both organic and inorganic pollutants. In soil washing, excavated soil is vigorously mixed with a solution(s) (typically water) that separates the contaminants from the large particle size fractions. The recyclable washwater is then treated to remove the contaminants. Unlike most conventional soil washing processes, all particle size fractions were washed and recovered during the course of this research. Several retention mechanisms can be operative within a soil system. Cation exchange (weak outer sphere complexation) and specific adsorption (strong inner sphere complexation) are two mechanisms controlling metal adsorption. Heavy metals can also be retained by solid state diffusion and precipitation reactions. Heavy metal retention has been found to generally increase with increases soil pH, CEC, organic content, clay content, and the metal oxide content of the soil. While metal oxides can be both crystalline and amorphous in nature, amorphous metal oxides such as allophanes usually sequester heavy metals to a larger extent than do crystalline metal oxides such as geothite. The strength of metal retention generally increases as the initial concentration of the contaminant decreases. The average binding strength of a soil decreases once the high energy binding sites are selectively filled first. This research focused on lead contamination, since lead is one of the most common inorganic contaminants at Superfund sites across the nation,1 and most soil types have a particular affinity for lead. It is plausible to expect washing solutions that are capable of removing lead could also remove other divalent heavy metals. Lead is commonly found at sites where past industrial activities include battery breaking and recycling, oil refining, paint manufacturing, metal molding and plating, and smelting.1 Lead pollution from the automobile industry is also extensive. Eight soils were characterized and contaminated with various lead concentrations. Some samples were also contaminated with TCE (200 mg/kg) or naphthoic acid (1,000 mg/kg) to study the effects of organic contamination upon lead removal from contaminated soils. The efficiencies of six washing solutions in removing lead from the contaminated soils were investigated via lab-scale batch washing experiments. Kinetic studies were also performed to determine the time required for the samples to reach quasi-equilibrium conditions. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Four research objectives were defined at the start of the experimental study: 1. Determine the lead retention capacity of each study soil. 2. Identify parameters controlling the retention and release of lead from soils. 3. Identify the washing solution(s) most effective in removing lead from soils. 4. Identify the soil type(s) most amenable to treatment by soil washing. 48th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1993 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 169
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199317 |
Title | Efficiencies of soil washing solutions for the remediation of lead and organically contaminated soils |
Author |
Cline, Steven R. Reed, Brian E. Matsumoto, Mark R. |
Date of Original | 1993 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 48th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,21159 |
Extent of Original | p. 169-178 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-03 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 169 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 17 EFFICIENCIES OF SOIL WASHING SOLUTIONS FOR THE REMEDIATION OF LEAD AND ORGANICALLY CONTAMINATED SOILS Steven R. Cline, Graduate Assistant Brian E. Reed, Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6101 Mark R. Matsumoto, Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, New York 14260 INTRODUCTION Heavy metals are often found in soils at high concentrations as a result of man's neglect for the environment. Unlike many organic pollutants that are subject to biodegradation, heavy metals will not degrade to harmless end products. Soil washing has recently become a popular ex-situ technique for remediating sites contaminated with both organic and inorganic pollutants. In soil washing, excavated soil is vigorously mixed with a solution(s) (typically water) that separates the contaminants from the large particle size fractions. The recyclable washwater is then treated to remove the contaminants. Unlike most conventional soil washing processes, all particle size fractions were washed and recovered during the course of this research. Several retention mechanisms can be operative within a soil system. Cation exchange (weak outer sphere complexation) and specific adsorption (strong inner sphere complexation) are two mechanisms controlling metal adsorption. Heavy metals can also be retained by solid state diffusion and precipitation reactions. Heavy metal retention has been found to generally increase with increases soil pH, CEC, organic content, clay content, and the metal oxide content of the soil. While metal oxides can be both crystalline and amorphous in nature, amorphous metal oxides such as allophanes usually sequester heavy metals to a larger extent than do crystalline metal oxides such as geothite. The strength of metal retention generally increases as the initial concentration of the contaminant decreases. The average binding strength of a soil decreases once the high energy binding sites are selectively filled first. This research focused on lead contamination, since lead is one of the most common inorganic contaminants at Superfund sites across the nation,1 and most soil types have a particular affinity for lead. It is plausible to expect washing solutions that are capable of removing lead could also remove other divalent heavy metals. Lead is commonly found at sites where past industrial activities include battery breaking and recycling, oil refining, paint manufacturing, metal molding and plating, and smelting.1 Lead pollution from the automobile industry is also extensive. Eight soils were characterized and contaminated with various lead concentrations. Some samples were also contaminated with TCE (200 mg/kg) or naphthoic acid (1,000 mg/kg) to study the effects of organic contamination upon lead removal from contaminated soils. The efficiencies of six washing solutions in removing lead from the contaminated soils were investigated via lab-scale batch washing experiments. Kinetic studies were also performed to determine the time required for the samples to reach quasi-equilibrium conditions. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Four research objectives were defined at the start of the experimental study: 1. Determine the lead retention capacity of each study soil. 2. Identify parameters controlling the retention and release of lead from soils. 3. Identify the washing solution(s) most effective in removing lead from soils. 4. Identify the soil type(s) most amenable to treatment by soil washing. 48th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1993 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 169 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 169