page 702 |
Previous | 1 of 11 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Treatment of Textile Finishing Wastes by Surface Aeration GEORGE A. RHAME, Chief Water Pollution Control South Carolina Pollution Control Authority Columbia, South Carolina INTRODUCTION The State of South Carolina, as many of you may know, is blessed with a considerable number of textile finishing plants engaged in producing a wide variety of yard goods. Yardage amounts to a very substantial portion of the entire United States production. The bulk of this production results in a wastewater characterized by high pH, high BOD and much color. Waste treatment efforts of 20 years ago largely centered around anaerobic lagoons in South Carolina. There was much agitation over methods for inplant reduction of BOD. Eventual realization of the importance of C02 production by the treatment process as a method of reducing pH has changed this attitude somewhat. The introduction of biological waste treatment using long aeration periods and surface aerators has brought about a great improvement in the treatment of textile finishing wastes. I will not attempt to review the history of this development, much of which has been presented at this conference. This paper will present some of the data collected by the staff of the South Carolina Pollution Control Authority in the course of its regular surveillance work. In many cases the treatment plants are deficient in flow metering and reported hydraulic loads are based on water consumption. A number of suspicious looking reports are not used here. TREATMENT SYSTEMS Treatment systems, in general, usually fall into three types (Figure 1). Type A-raw waste enters the aeration basin, is aerated and discharged without further treatment. Type B—wastes leaving the aeration basin enters a large shallow lagoon for sedimentation and additional biological decomposition. Type C—wastes leaving the aeration basin enters a conventional sedimentation tank equipped with a sludge removal mechanism. Collected sludge is returned to the aeration basin. (Do not return to the raw waste stream) Return rate is generally 100 percent of design raw waste flow. 702
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197163 |
Title | Treatment of textile finishing wastes by surface aeration |
Author | Rhame, G. A. (George A.) |
Date of Original | 1971 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 26th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,19214 |
Extent of Original | p. 702-712 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 140 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-25 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 702 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Treatment of Textile Finishing Wastes by Surface Aeration GEORGE A. RHAME, Chief Water Pollution Control South Carolina Pollution Control Authority Columbia, South Carolina INTRODUCTION The State of South Carolina, as many of you may know, is blessed with a considerable number of textile finishing plants engaged in producing a wide variety of yard goods. Yardage amounts to a very substantial portion of the entire United States production. The bulk of this production results in a wastewater characterized by high pH, high BOD and much color. Waste treatment efforts of 20 years ago largely centered around anaerobic lagoons in South Carolina. There was much agitation over methods for inplant reduction of BOD. Eventual realization of the importance of C02 production by the treatment process as a method of reducing pH has changed this attitude somewhat. The introduction of biological waste treatment using long aeration periods and surface aerators has brought about a great improvement in the treatment of textile finishing wastes. I will not attempt to review the history of this development, much of which has been presented at this conference. This paper will present some of the data collected by the staff of the South Carolina Pollution Control Authority in the course of its regular surveillance work. In many cases the treatment plants are deficient in flow metering and reported hydraulic loads are based on water consumption. A number of suspicious looking reports are not used here. TREATMENT SYSTEMS Treatment systems, in general, usually fall into three types (Figure 1). Type A-raw waste enters the aeration basin, is aerated and discharged without further treatment. Type B—wastes leaving the aeration basin enters a large shallow lagoon for sedimentation and additional biological decomposition. Type C—wastes leaving the aeration basin enters a conventional sedimentation tank equipped with a sludge removal mechanism. Collected sludge is returned to the aeration basin. (Do not return to the raw waste stream) Return rate is generally 100 percent of design raw waste flow. 702 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 702