page 665 |
Previous | 1 of 11 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Studies on Sludge Yield in Aerobic Systems M. RAMANATHAN, Project Engineer Roy F. Weston, Inc. West Chester, Pennsylvania A. F. GAUDY, Jr., Professor Bioenvironmental Engineering Laboratories Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma INTRODUCTION The need to make a reliable estimate of the amount of biological solids produced when a given amount of substrate is utilized is of obvious importance in the field of biological waste treatment. A numerical value for sludge yield (or cell yield) is needed to size sludge disposal facilities. Also, the sludge yield (Y) is an important "constant" in design and operational models for biological treatment systems (e.g., activated sludge processes). It is also of obvious importance in various commercial fermentations employing specific "pure" cultures, and the cell yield has received considerable investigational attention in the basic microbiological field. In the pollution control field, Burkehead and McKinney have reviewed various thermodynamic parameters given by McKinney (1), Servizi and Bogan (2), and McCarty (3), relating cell yield to changes in heat content or free energy of the carbon source. These concepts have been criticized by various workers, for example, Hetling, et al (4) and Schroeder and Busch (5). Regardless of the question of the utility or of the validity of such concepts, past work reported by Rao and Gaudy has provided evidence that, in heterogeneous populations, changes in predominance of species bring about changes in Y which are sufficiently large to make highly questionable the utility of such thermodynamic properties of the substrate for predicting cell yield (6). For example, in a study which included 44 determinations of Y, on a single carbon source (i.e., constant thermodynamic parameters), the average yield value was 65 percent with a coefficient of variation of 17 percent (i.e., a range of 48 to 82 percent). Large differences in Y were correlated to gross changes in species predominance in the system. Gross prediction of Y for heterogeneous populations, such as found in activated sludge, purely on thermodynamic properties of the waste (provided these can be readily determined, in any event), would seem to be an overly simplistic approach. Gaudy and Gaudy have discussed problems encountered in evaluation of cell yield and biological bases for variations in this important parameter for both pure cultures and heterogeneous microbial populations (7). Other recent reviews on cell yield are those by Forest (8) and by Payne (9). MATERIALS AND METHODS One of the problems that workers have when compiling and analyzing published cell yield values is the different methods of measurement used by various 665
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197160 |
Title | Studies on sludge yield in aerobic systems |
Author |
Ramanathan, M. Gaudy, Anthony F. |
Date of Original | 1971 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 26th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,19214 |
Extent of Original | p. 665-675 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 140 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-25 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 665 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Studies on Sludge Yield in Aerobic Systems M. RAMANATHAN, Project Engineer Roy F. Weston, Inc. West Chester, Pennsylvania A. F. GAUDY, Jr., Professor Bioenvironmental Engineering Laboratories Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma INTRODUCTION The need to make a reliable estimate of the amount of biological solids produced when a given amount of substrate is utilized is of obvious importance in the field of biological waste treatment. A numerical value for sludge yield (or cell yield) is needed to size sludge disposal facilities. Also, the sludge yield (Y) is an important "constant" in design and operational models for biological treatment systems (e.g., activated sludge processes). It is also of obvious importance in various commercial fermentations employing specific "pure" cultures, and the cell yield has received considerable investigational attention in the basic microbiological field. In the pollution control field, Burkehead and McKinney have reviewed various thermodynamic parameters given by McKinney (1), Servizi and Bogan (2), and McCarty (3), relating cell yield to changes in heat content or free energy of the carbon source. These concepts have been criticized by various workers, for example, Hetling, et al (4) and Schroeder and Busch (5). Regardless of the question of the utility or of the validity of such concepts, past work reported by Rao and Gaudy has provided evidence that, in heterogeneous populations, changes in predominance of species bring about changes in Y which are sufficiently large to make highly questionable the utility of such thermodynamic properties of the substrate for predicting cell yield (6). For example, in a study which included 44 determinations of Y, on a single carbon source (i.e., constant thermodynamic parameters), the average yield value was 65 percent with a coefficient of variation of 17 percent (i.e., a range of 48 to 82 percent). Large differences in Y were correlated to gross changes in species predominance in the system. Gross prediction of Y for heterogeneous populations, such as found in activated sludge, purely on thermodynamic properties of the waste (provided these can be readily determined, in any event), would seem to be an overly simplistic approach. Gaudy and Gaudy have discussed problems encountered in evaluation of cell yield and biological bases for variations in this important parameter for both pure cultures and heterogeneous microbial populations (7). Other recent reviews on cell yield are those by Forest (8) and by Payne (9). MATERIALS AND METHODS One of the problems that workers have when compiling and analyzing published cell yield values is the different methods of measurement used by various 665 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 665