page258 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Alternatives in Cattle Feedlot Waste Management RICHARD R. DAGUE, Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa INTRODUCTION There are about 200,000 cattle feedlots in the 32 leading cattle feeding states of the United States. Nearly 22 million cattle were marketed from these lots in 1967. While on feed these 22 million animals defecated about 200 million lb/day (dry weight) of manure. In comparison, the human population of the U. S. produced about 100 million lb/day of garbage (wastes from food processing and preparation). The above numbers may place the garbage disposal problem in perspective but they are misleading as an indication of the relative importance of the two sources of environmental pollutants. The numbers might indicate why compost produced from garbage has little or no value as a soil conditioner — but they do not mean that the manure disposal problem is twice as severe as the garbage disposal problem. The management of wastes from cattle feedlots is a unique problem in environmental quality control. It cannot be compared to the control of wastes from domestic and industrial sources on any realistic or meaningful basis. The quantities and characteristics of wastes from cattle feedlots are affected by many variables. In turn, the effect that the feedlot wastes have on the environment is related to numeroud other factors. The control practices employed in a given region or state or at a given feedlot must consider these matters. A necessary and effective control practice in the High Plains of Texas may not apply to Kansas or Iowa. An effective procedure at one feedlot may prove ineffective at another. Perhaps no other source of wastes, domestic or industrial, requires a larger "bag of tricks" for satisfactory solutions than agricultural sources. In recent years workers from many disciplines have contributed to the accumulation of the fundamental knowledge needed to solve feedlot waste problems. These fundamentals provide a reasonably solid basis for evaluating the alternatives in cattle feedlot waste management. FEEDLOT WASTE CHARACTERISTICS The task of determining the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of cattle feedlot wastes is difficult. As noted by Taiganides and Hazen, the characteristics of animal wastes are affected by the physiology of the animal, the feed ration and the environmental conditions to which the animal is subjected (1). In addition, variations in the analytical procedures used to characterize the waste leads to still further differences in reported results. -258-
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197025 |
Title | Alternatives in cattle feedlot waste management |
Author | Dague, Richard R. |
Date of Original | 1970 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 25th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,18196 |
Extent of Original | p. 258-265 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 137 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-09 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page258 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Alternatives in Cattle Feedlot Waste Management RICHARD R. DAGUE, Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa INTRODUCTION There are about 200,000 cattle feedlots in the 32 leading cattle feeding states of the United States. Nearly 22 million cattle were marketed from these lots in 1967. While on feed these 22 million animals defecated about 200 million lb/day (dry weight) of manure. In comparison, the human population of the U. S. produced about 100 million lb/day of garbage (wastes from food processing and preparation). The above numbers may place the garbage disposal problem in perspective but they are misleading as an indication of the relative importance of the two sources of environmental pollutants. The numbers might indicate why compost produced from garbage has little or no value as a soil conditioner — but they do not mean that the manure disposal problem is twice as severe as the garbage disposal problem. The management of wastes from cattle feedlots is a unique problem in environmental quality control. It cannot be compared to the control of wastes from domestic and industrial sources on any realistic or meaningful basis. The quantities and characteristics of wastes from cattle feedlots are affected by many variables. In turn, the effect that the feedlot wastes have on the environment is related to numeroud other factors. The control practices employed in a given region or state or at a given feedlot must consider these matters. A necessary and effective control practice in the High Plains of Texas may not apply to Kansas or Iowa. An effective procedure at one feedlot may prove ineffective at another. Perhaps no other source of wastes, domestic or industrial, requires a larger "bag of tricks" for satisfactory solutions than agricultural sources. In recent years workers from many disciplines have contributed to the accumulation of the fundamental knowledge needed to solve feedlot waste problems. These fundamentals provide a reasonably solid basis for evaluating the alternatives in cattle feedlot waste management. FEEDLOT WASTE CHARACTERISTICS The task of determining the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of cattle feedlot wastes is difficult. As noted by Taiganides and Hazen, the characteristics of animal wastes are affected by the physiology of the animal, the feed ration and the environmental conditions to which the animal is subjected (1). In addition, variations in the analytical procedures used to characterize the waste leads to still further differences in reported results. -258- |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page258