page 1103 |
Previous | 1 of 17 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Purification of Starch Industry Waste Water CARL F. SEYFRIED, Deputy Chief Engineer Ruhrverband Essen, Germany INTRODUCTION Before the war the demand for starch and starch products in Germany was covered by home production. As the larger part of the plants is located beyond the Iron Curtain, after the war the Federal Republic of Germany was forced to import a great deal of starch. Later on starch industry in the Federal Republic was rapidly booming. Since 1950 production has approximately doubled. At present more than 250,000 tons of starch are produced annually. Above all maize and potatoes are processed, to a smaller extent also wheat flour, broken rice and manioc. The present water consumption of the starch industry can be estimated at more than 10 million cu m/year (2. 64 billion US gals/year). During the season the quantity of polluting matter discharged by the starch industry equals more than one million population equivalents per working day. As in Germany there was only a small knowledge available on the amount and concentration of starch wastes and their treatment, the Institut fur Siedlungs- wasserwirtschaft of the Technical University in Hannover was ordered to conduct investigations. This report, which also makes use of the few dates stated in European literature, will be a short survey on these investigations and on the results of pilot plants. WASTEWATER AND POLLUTION The principle of starch production is similar for all kinds of starch. The fruits used as raw material are carefully washed and conditioned. The material is ground or crushed. Thus the starch cells are broken and the starch granules can be extracted. The starch granules are washed out of the ground stock. The crude starch milk flowing out contains pollution residues. The crude starch milk is separated from the other constituents such as protein, minerals, soluble carbohydrates, etc. The washed starch mixed with water is called starch milk. The starch is separated from the starch milk and dewatered. Then it is either dried, sifted and packed or further processed. Maize Starch Plants A maize starch plant is a complex manufacturing process (Figure 1). It has been indicated that quantity and concentration of the waste can be decreased to about 10 per cent of the original amount byinternal arrangements. Table I shows the average wastewater values of these plants. - 1103 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196887 |
Title | Purification of starch industry wastewater |
Author | Seyfried, Carl F. |
Date of Original | 1968 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 23rd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,15314 |
Extent of Original | p. 1103-1119 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 132 Engineering bulletin v. 53, no. 2 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 1103 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Purification of Starch Industry Waste Water CARL F. SEYFRIED, Deputy Chief Engineer Ruhrverband Essen, Germany INTRODUCTION Before the war the demand for starch and starch products in Germany was covered by home production. As the larger part of the plants is located beyond the Iron Curtain, after the war the Federal Republic of Germany was forced to import a great deal of starch. Later on starch industry in the Federal Republic was rapidly booming. Since 1950 production has approximately doubled. At present more than 250,000 tons of starch are produced annually. Above all maize and potatoes are processed, to a smaller extent also wheat flour, broken rice and manioc. The present water consumption of the starch industry can be estimated at more than 10 million cu m/year (2. 64 billion US gals/year). During the season the quantity of polluting matter discharged by the starch industry equals more than one million population equivalents per working day. As in Germany there was only a small knowledge available on the amount and concentration of starch wastes and their treatment, the Institut fur Siedlungs- wasserwirtschaft of the Technical University in Hannover was ordered to conduct investigations. This report, which also makes use of the few dates stated in European literature, will be a short survey on these investigations and on the results of pilot plants. WASTEWATER AND POLLUTION The principle of starch production is similar for all kinds of starch. The fruits used as raw material are carefully washed and conditioned. The material is ground or crushed. Thus the starch cells are broken and the starch granules can be extracted. The starch granules are washed out of the ground stock. The crude starch milk flowing out contains pollution residues. The crude starch milk is separated from the other constituents such as protein, minerals, soluble carbohydrates, etc. The washed starch mixed with water is called starch milk. The starch is separated from the starch milk and dewatered. Then it is either dried, sifted and packed or further processed. Maize Starch Plants A maize starch plant is a complex manufacturing process (Figure 1). It has been indicated that quantity and concentration of the waste can be decreased to about 10 per cent of the original amount byinternal arrangements. Table I shows the average wastewater values of these plants. - 1103 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 1103