page 754 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Effects of Dam Reaeration on Waste Assimilation Capacities of the Mohawk River MICHAEL A. MASTROPIETRO, Sanitary Engineer Bureau of Water Quality Management New York State Department of Health Albany, New York INTRODUCTION In 1965, the New York State Health Department decided to study in detail two of the major rivers in the state. It was decided that separate studies would be done in the Mohawk River, which flows into the Hudson River and on the Upper Hudson (non-tidal) and Lower Hudson (tidal). The purpose of these studies would be to develop mathematical water quality models for the main stems of the Hudson and Mohawk Rivers. These models could then be used by the State to predict water quality, determine treatment requirements, and aid in the management of the water resources of the basins. Due to the lack of engineering personnel it became necessary to contract the studies out to consulting engineering firms. Hydrosciencelnc. of Leo ni a, Newjersey was awarded the Mohawk contract and Quirk, Lawler and Matusky of New York City was awarded the Hudson study. In both studies the State agreed to participate actively by supplying personnel, equipment, and laboratory facilities. At the start of the Mohawk Study, several problems were envisioned. One of these was how to evaluate dam reaeration at the many dams along the Mohawk River and Barge Canal. The situation was compounded because the dams varied in physical characteristics and there was no historical data to give an insight to the problem. This paper presents the technique that was used to evaluate dam reaeration and determine its effects on the waste assimilation capacity of the Mohawk River. THE MOHAWK RIVER BASIN The headwaters of the Mohawk River are in forested areas north of Rome, N. Y. From there the flow is south to Delta Reservoir where excess runoff is stored to be used during periods of low rainfall to maintain navigation in the Barge Canal. Below Delta Reservoir the flow continues south to Rome and the Barge Canal. Here the river turns abruptly eastward and flows past Utica, Little Falls, Amsterdam, Schenectady, and a host of smaller communities on its way to its confluence with the Hudson River. For a short distance after joining at Rome, the Mohawk River and the Barge Canal are one and the same and they separate to join again at Frankfort. Between Frankfort and St. Johnsville the Mohawk River and the Barge Canal separate and join again at several points. From St. Johnsville eastward to the Crescent Dam in Cohoes the canal and the river flow together. They separate at the Cohoes Falls and join again at Green Island just before meeting the Hudson. Figure 1 is a general location map of the Mohawk River and Barge Canal. - 754 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196861 |
Title | Effects of dam reaeration on waste assimilation capacities of the Mohawk River |
Author | Mastropietro, Michael A. |
Date of Original | 1968 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 23rd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,15314 |
Extent of Original | p. 754-765 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 132 Engineering bulletin v. 53, no. 2 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 754 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Effects of Dam Reaeration on Waste Assimilation Capacities of the Mohawk River MICHAEL A. MASTROPIETRO, Sanitary Engineer Bureau of Water Quality Management New York State Department of Health Albany, New York INTRODUCTION In 1965, the New York State Health Department decided to study in detail two of the major rivers in the state. It was decided that separate studies would be done in the Mohawk River, which flows into the Hudson River and on the Upper Hudson (non-tidal) and Lower Hudson (tidal). The purpose of these studies would be to develop mathematical water quality models for the main stems of the Hudson and Mohawk Rivers. These models could then be used by the State to predict water quality, determine treatment requirements, and aid in the management of the water resources of the basins. Due to the lack of engineering personnel it became necessary to contract the studies out to consulting engineering firms. Hydrosciencelnc. of Leo ni a, Newjersey was awarded the Mohawk contract and Quirk, Lawler and Matusky of New York City was awarded the Hudson study. In both studies the State agreed to participate actively by supplying personnel, equipment, and laboratory facilities. At the start of the Mohawk Study, several problems were envisioned. One of these was how to evaluate dam reaeration at the many dams along the Mohawk River and Barge Canal. The situation was compounded because the dams varied in physical characteristics and there was no historical data to give an insight to the problem. This paper presents the technique that was used to evaluate dam reaeration and determine its effects on the waste assimilation capacity of the Mohawk River. THE MOHAWK RIVER BASIN The headwaters of the Mohawk River are in forested areas north of Rome, N. Y. From there the flow is south to Delta Reservoir where excess runoff is stored to be used during periods of low rainfall to maintain navigation in the Barge Canal. Below Delta Reservoir the flow continues south to Rome and the Barge Canal. Here the river turns abruptly eastward and flows past Utica, Little Falls, Amsterdam, Schenectady, and a host of smaller communities on its way to its confluence with the Hudson River. For a short distance after joining at Rome, the Mohawk River and the Barge Canal are one and the same and they separate to join again at Frankfort. Between Frankfort and St. Johnsville the Mohawk River and the Barge Canal separate and join again at several points. From St. Johnsville eastward to the Crescent Dam in Cohoes the canal and the river flow together. They separate at the Cohoes Falls and join again at Green Island just before meeting the Hudson. Figure 1 is a general location map of the Mohawk River and Barge Canal. - 754 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 754