page 848 |
Previous | 1 of 13 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Removal of COD from Wastewater by Fly Ash PRODIP K. DEB, Project Engineer ALAN J. RUBIN, Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio ARTHUR W. LAUNDER, Sanitary Engineer Monsanto Company St. Louis, Missouri K. H. MANCY, Assistant Professor School of Public Health University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan INTRODUCTION Considerable emphasis has been placed on research concerned with the removal of biologically resistant material from polluted waters. The evaluation of processes capable of performing such treatment is based on the efficiency of removal and economic feasibility. Among the several currently known physical, chemical and biological methods used for the removal of organic refractory materials from wastewater, adsorption has been indicated as the most promising technique (1). The literature on adsorption reveals that activated carbon is more frequently used as an adsorbent than any other material. The high organophilic character of activated carbon makes it an efficient scavenger of organic refractories in wastewater renovation operations and so it has found its largest market in industrial and municipal water purification (2). However, activated carbon has several disadvantages; the powdered forms cost from seven to nine cents per pound, and the granular types cost from 25 to 50 cents per lb (3). In addition, an economical regeneration process for the costly adsorbent is yet to be developed. These economic drawbacks of active carbon have initiated an interest in low cost, but less efficient, adsorbents. Many investigators have studied the feasibility of using such substances, including a variety of clays, minerals, and industrial by-products (4,5). With the advent of modern coal firing methods, large quantities of a solid combustion by-product has come into being. Commonly designated fly ash, this by-product has created a disposal problem for many utilities, including the electric power industry. While fly ash is a disposal problem to such utilities, the need for an economical adsorbent, available in large quantities, is a need faced by many wastewater renovation programs. Literature survey has revealed that fly ash has been used in a variety of applications, including the construction of roads, dams and bridges, the making of - 848 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196668 |
Title | Removal of COD from wastewater by fly ash |
Author |
Deb, P. K. (Prodip K.) Rubin, Alan J. Launder, Arthur W. Mancy, K. H. |
Date of Original | 1966 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 21st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,12965 |
Extent of Original | p. 848-860 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 121 Engineering bulletin v. 50, no. 2 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 848 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Removal of COD from Wastewater by Fly Ash PRODIP K. DEB, Project Engineer ALAN J. RUBIN, Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio ARTHUR W. LAUNDER, Sanitary Engineer Monsanto Company St. Louis, Missouri K. H. MANCY, Assistant Professor School of Public Health University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan INTRODUCTION Considerable emphasis has been placed on research concerned with the removal of biologically resistant material from polluted waters. The evaluation of processes capable of performing such treatment is based on the efficiency of removal and economic feasibility. Among the several currently known physical, chemical and biological methods used for the removal of organic refractory materials from wastewater, adsorption has been indicated as the most promising technique (1). The literature on adsorption reveals that activated carbon is more frequently used as an adsorbent than any other material. The high organophilic character of activated carbon makes it an efficient scavenger of organic refractories in wastewater renovation operations and so it has found its largest market in industrial and municipal water purification (2). However, activated carbon has several disadvantages; the powdered forms cost from seven to nine cents per pound, and the granular types cost from 25 to 50 cents per lb (3). In addition, an economical regeneration process for the costly adsorbent is yet to be developed. These economic drawbacks of active carbon have initiated an interest in low cost, but less efficient, adsorbents. Many investigators have studied the feasibility of using such substances, including a variety of clays, minerals, and industrial by-products (4,5). With the advent of modern coal firing methods, large quantities of a solid combustion by-product has come into being. Commonly designated fly ash, this by-product has created a disposal problem for many utilities, including the electric power industry. While fly ash is a disposal problem to such utilities, the need for an economical adsorbent, available in large quantities, is a need faced by many wastewater renovation programs. Literature survey has revealed that fly ash has been used in a variety of applications, including the construction of roads, dams and bridges, the making of - 848 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 848