page 239 |
Previous | 1 of 14 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
The Administration of Stream Pollution Prevention in Some States HAROLD E. BABBITT Professor of Sanitary Engineering University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois This is a reporter's report of his conclusions after a visit to stream pollution control authorities in 26 different states. No new principles of administration are presented nor advocated. It is a factual report of what was observed, together with a few comments and here and there some emphasis to point out trends in forms of administration. To bring out these trends there are lengthy abstracts and quotations from state laws typifying various forms of administrative practice. In obtaining the desired information the best source was found to be the Chief Sanitary Engineer of the State Department of Public Health, whether or not he was the state official made responsible, by law, for the prevention of stream pollution. The information contained herein might be obtained through correspondence and questionnaire. It is believed, however, that the personal interview is more effective and thorough, and it is known to be more pleasant. The 26 states visited extend from Illinois to Maine, down the Atlantic Coast to Florida, westward along the Gulf and the Mexican border, including the states bordering Texas, to California and Nevada. The trip was taken to accomplish an objective of a six-months sabbatical leave from the University of Illinois. Generalizations concerning conditions in various states and in various sections of the country might be attempted but it would be dangerous to state that conditions are better or poorer in any state or region than in any other state or region. It is safe to say that the administration of stream pollution prevention throughout the states visited, and by in¬ ference throughout the country, is in a condition of flux. Significant changes in the laws have been made within the past five years in some of the more populous and industrialized states. Some states are in the throes of or are contemplating changes in their laws or the promulgation of new laws in the near future. Most states are functioning under either old 239
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC195126 |
Title | Administration of stream pollution prevention in some states |
Author | Babbitt, Harold E. |
Date of Original | 1951 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the Sixth Industrial Waste Utilization Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,106 |
Extent of Original | p. 239-252 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650c |
Capture Details | ScandAll21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 239 |
Date of Original | 1951 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650c |
Capture Details | ScandAll21 |
Transcript | The Administration of Stream Pollution Prevention in Some States HAROLD E. BABBITT Professor of Sanitary Engineering University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois This is a reporter's report of his conclusions after a visit to stream pollution control authorities in 26 different states. No new principles of administration are presented nor advocated. It is a factual report of what was observed, together with a few comments and here and there some emphasis to point out trends in forms of administration. To bring out these trends there are lengthy abstracts and quotations from state laws typifying various forms of administrative practice. In obtaining the desired information the best source was found to be the Chief Sanitary Engineer of the State Department of Public Health, whether or not he was the state official made responsible, by law, for the prevention of stream pollution. The information contained herein might be obtained through correspondence and questionnaire. It is believed, however, that the personal interview is more effective and thorough, and it is known to be more pleasant. The 26 states visited extend from Illinois to Maine, down the Atlantic Coast to Florida, westward along the Gulf and the Mexican border, including the states bordering Texas, to California and Nevada. The trip was taken to accomplish an objective of a six-months sabbatical leave from the University of Illinois. Generalizations concerning conditions in various states and in various sections of the country might be attempted but it would be dangerous to state that conditions are better or poorer in any state or region than in any other state or region. It is safe to say that the administration of stream pollution prevention throughout the states visited, and by in¬ ference throughout the country, is in a condition of flux. Significant changes in the laws have been made within the past five years in some of the more populous and industrialized states. Some states are in the throes of or are contemplating changes in their laws or the promulgation of new laws in the near future. Most states are functioning under either old 239 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 239