page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 3 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Control of Water at Strip Mining Operations through Sound Mining and Reclamation Practices JAMES A. DEANE, Director Forestry and Water Quality Peabody Coal Company St. Louis, Missouri Water control at strip mine operations has two separate parts. The first is handling the waste from the cleaning plant. The second is the handling of the water at the active pit itself. The mining operation with proper planning will have little or no effect on the receiving stream. The fine coal waste or "slurry" can be handled by building settling ponds to allow the suspended solids to settle out. The water can then overflow to the stream. In most cases, however, the water flows to another pond or lake and is pumped back to the cleaning plant. This type of closed circuit allows no water from the cleaning plant to get into the adjacent streams. The heavy coal waste or "gob" can be handled in two ways. It can be pumped with the slurry or it can be hauled to a disposal area. The drainage from gob" itself gives us most of our acid mine drainage since it is high in pyrites. The "gob" that is pumped with the slurry does not contribute acia water to the stream as long as the mine is active. The closed circuit system minimizes the chance of acid water getting to the stream. Once the mining operation ceases, these "gob piles" can contribute a great amount of acid water to the streams. Several things have been tried to seal the refuse from air and moisture; both of which are needed to cause sulfuric acid. Asphalt spraying was tried in Illinois, but did not hold up over the winter. Allowing the refuse to Durn eliminates the water problem but creates an air pollution problem. To date, the only sure known method to eliminate this pollutant contributor is to cover it with a soil material. This must be a well designed operation. The "gob pile" should be graded, terraced and covered with soil. When the refuse is covered, it should be planted to establish a vegetative cover. This vegetative cover will minimize the erosion of the soil covering. The cost of covering a "gob pile" varies from 800 to 2,000 dollars per acre. The cost depends on the size of the "gob pile" and the availability of the soil material used to cover it. Heavy refuse that is hauled can be disposed of by depositing in piles on the ground. The method is not very successful as the water running off this pile will be acid; also, you still have the expense of covering it. If this method is used diversion ditches should be dug around the disposal area. The best way to handle the heavy refuse is to haul it back to the active pit. It is then covered during the stripping operation. Should the haul to active pit be too long, the refuse should be hauled to an abandoned pit that is close. Hauling to an abandoned pit will place the refuse below drainage and no acid water will get to the streams. When the pit is almost filled with refuse the surrounding spoil can be used to cover it. Water encountered during the mining operation should be intercepted before it enters the pit. Diversion ditches above the hi-wall will handle run-off water. - 1 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196601 |
Title | Control of water at strip mining operations through sound mining and reclamation practices |
Author | Deane, James A. |
Date of Original | 1966 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 21st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,12965 |
Extent of Original | p. 1-3 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 121 Engineering bulletin v. 50, no. 2 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 1 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Control of Water at Strip Mining Operations through Sound Mining and Reclamation Practices JAMES A. DEANE, Director Forestry and Water Quality Peabody Coal Company St. Louis, Missouri Water control at strip mine operations has two separate parts. The first is handling the waste from the cleaning plant. The second is the handling of the water at the active pit itself. The mining operation with proper planning will have little or no effect on the receiving stream. The fine coal waste or "slurry" can be handled by building settling ponds to allow the suspended solids to settle out. The water can then overflow to the stream. In most cases, however, the water flows to another pond or lake and is pumped back to the cleaning plant. This type of closed circuit allows no water from the cleaning plant to get into the adjacent streams. The heavy coal waste or "gob" can be handled in two ways. It can be pumped with the slurry or it can be hauled to a disposal area. The drainage from gob" itself gives us most of our acid mine drainage since it is high in pyrites. The "gob" that is pumped with the slurry does not contribute acia water to the stream as long as the mine is active. The closed circuit system minimizes the chance of acid water getting to the stream. Once the mining operation ceases, these "gob piles" can contribute a great amount of acid water to the streams. Several things have been tried to seal the refuse from air and moisture; both of which are needed to cause sulfuric acid. Asphalt spraying was tried in Illinois, but did not hold up over the winter. Allowing the refuse to Durn eliminates the water problem but creates an air pollution problem. To date, the only sure known method to eliminate this pollutant contributor is to cover it with a soil material. This must be a well designed operation. The "gob pile" should be graded, terraced and covered with soil. When the refuse is covered, it should be planted to establish a vegetative cover. This vegetative cover will minimize the erosion of the soil covering. The cost of covering a "gob pile" varies from 800 to 2,000 dollars per acre. The cost depends on the size of the "gob pile" and the availability of the soil material used to cover it. Heavy refuse that is hauled can be disposed of by depositing in piles on the ground. The method is not very successful as the water running off this pile will be acid; also, you still have the expense of covering it. If this method is used diversion ditches should be dug around the disposal area. The best way to handle the heavy refuse is to haul it back to the active pit. It is then covered during the stripping operation. Should the haul to active pit be too long, the refuse should be hauled to an abandoned pit that is close. Hauling to an abandoned pit will place the refuse below drainage and no acid water will get to the streams. When the pit is almost filled with refuse the surrounding spoil can be used to cover it. Water encountered during the mining operation should be intercepted before it enters the pit. Diversion ditches above the hi-wall will handle run-off water. - 1 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 1