page 158 |
Previous | 1 of 13 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Findings from a Cooperative Study of Phenol Waste Treatment EDWARD J. CLEARY AND JOHN E. KINNEY Executive Director and Sanitary Engineer Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission Cincinnati, Ohio These remarks are intended to portray the background and to serve as the preface, for discussion of a project relating to phenol destruction by chemical oxidation. You will note that the title of this presentation is "Findings From A Cooperative Study of Phenol Waste Treatment." The title was care¬ fully chosen to provide latitude for something more than a report on technical developments affecting treatment of a troublesome industrial waste. Not the least of the "findings" from this project is the demon¬ strated value of cooperative effort in seeking a solution to a problem of mutual concern to industry and to regulatory agencies. This report is the outcome of some unusually effective and unselfish teamwork in which the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commis¬ sion served in the role of coordinator. Principal participants on the team were the Armco Steel Corporation, the Wallace and Tiernan Company, the Ozone Processes Division of the Welsbach Corporation, the Mathieson Chemical Corporation and the sanitary engineering division of the Ohio State Health Department. Assisting the team were a host of others, notably the U.S. Public Health Service laboratories in Cincinnati, the Dow Chemical Company and various coke-producing plants. Quite aside from practical merits of technical information originating from this project, the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission takes great satisfaction from the manner in which the work was carried out. This finding, that the Commission can perform a useful service in inspiring and coordinating action on industrial waste treatment, compels attention. It does so because it lends validity to a basic concept held by the Commission: With a mandate and the legal powers for curbing pollution, the Commission also recognizes that issuance of a court order is not necessarily the quickest or most effective way to secure action. 158
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC195118 |
Title | Findings from a cooperative study of phenol waste treatment |
Author |
Cleary, Edward J. Kinney, John E. |
Date of Original | 1951 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the sixth Industrial Waste Utilization Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext, 106 |
Extent of Original | p. 158-170 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2008-09-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650c |
Capture Details | ScandAll21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 158 |
Date of Original | 1951 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650c |
Capture Details | ScandAll21 |
Transcript | Findings from a Cooperative Study of Phenol Waste Treatment EDWARD J. CLEARY AND JOHN E. KINNEY Executive Director and Sanitary Engineer Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission Cincinnati, Ohio These remarks are intended to portray the background and to serve as the preface, for discussion of a project relating to phenol destruction by chemical oxidation. You will note that the title of this presentation is "Findings From A Cooperative Study of Phenol Waste Treatment." The title was care¬ fully chosen to provide latitude for something more than a report on technical developments affecting treatment of a troublesome industrial waste. Not the least of the "findings" from this project is the demon¬ strated value of cooperative effort in seeking a solution to a problem of mutual concern to industry and to regulatory agencies. This report is the outcome of some unusually effective and unselfish teamwork in which the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commis¬ sion served in the role of coordinator. Principal participants on the team were the Armco Steel Corporation, the Wallace and Tiernan Company, the Ozone Processes Division of the Welsbach Corporation, the Mathieson Chemical Corporation and the sanitary engineering division of the Ohio State Health Department. Assisting the team were a host of others, notably the U.S. Public Health Service laboratories in Cincinnati, the Dow Chemical Company and various coke-producing plants. Quite aside from practical merits of technical information originating from this project, the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission takes great satisfaction from the manner in which the work was carried out. This finding, that the Commission can perform a useful service in inspiring and coordinating action on industrial waste treatment, compels attention. It does so because it lends validity to a basic concept held by the Commission: With a mandate and the legal powers for curbing pollution, the Commission also recognizes that issuance of a court order is not necessarily the quickest or most effective way to secure action. 158 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 158