page 965 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
The Foam Separation Process: A Model for Waste Treatment Application: ROBERT B. GRIEVES, Associate Professor of Civil and Chemical Engineering DIBAKARBHATTACHARYYA, Research Engineer Department of Civil Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois INTRODUCTION Continuous foam separation has a great deal of potential as a sanitary engineering separation technique; it has been used successfully in a number or waste treatment applications. Rubin (1,2) and Eldib (3) have reported on the foam separation of alkyl benzene sulfonate and of organics analyzed as chemical oxygen demand from secondary sewage effluents. Tertiary treatment by foaming provides a method for the concentration of organics which are difficult to decompose biologically; the concentrated foam may then be recycled and combined with the influent to the secondary process. The removal of radioactive metal ions from waste streams by the use of foaming agents has been investigated by Schoen (4,5), Schnepf (6), and Schonfeld (7). These applications involve rather dilute solutions; in addition, the process may be applied to wastes containing higher concentrations of surface-active agents, including the direct treatment of laundry wastes. Grieves and Wood (8) have proposed foaming for the removal of specific surfactants from industrial wastes, in particular from refining and petrochemical wastes. Eldib (9) has successfully foam separated phenol from refining wastes. Foam separation employs the tendency of unsymmetrical organic molecules to accumulate at an interface between a gas phase and the aqueous solution phase. Foam provides the means for the efficient generation and collection of gas-liquid interfaces. Several excellent reviews of the process have been compiled (9,10, 11). A schematic diagram of a foaming column is presented in Figure 1. The process is continuous with a steady liquid feed of rate, L ml/min and composition, xLmg/ml and with a gas rate, G ml/min. The steady rates of the effluent streams are F (collapsed foam) and B (bulk), of composition yc and xg, respectively. A list is presented of the significant independent variables controlling the process, and wherever possible, the corresponding designations are made on the diagram. The dependent variables, xn and F, are to be minimized for maximum efficiency: it is desirable to reduce the concentration of surfactant in the bulk stream to a minimum, at the same time providing a concentrated foam stream of low flow rate. Once the response of xg andF to changes in the independent variables is determined, yp and B may be calculated from the overall and component material balances. Although foam separation has been the subject of considerable study, little effort has peen devoted to understanding the fundamentals of the continuous, steady-state process, particularly including a quantization of the effect of each of the numerous independent variables. Some preliminary work has been done by Grieves, et al. (12,13,14,15) on the influence of Xl« L, G, t, Hp, and Hg upon the foaming of aqueous surfactant solutions; however, most of the conclusions have been qualitative. The overall objective of the present study is the development of a model describing the foam separation process: starting with basic 965 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196474 |
Title | Foam separation process: a model for waste treatment applications |
Author |
Grieves, R. B., 1935- Bhattacharyya, Dibakar |
Date of Original | 1964 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the nineteenth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,11114 |
Extent of Original | p. 965-976 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 117 Engineering bulletin v. 49, no. 1(a)-2 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-19 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 965 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | The Foam Separation Process: A Model for Waste Treatment Application: ROBERT B. GRIEVES, Associate Professor of Civil and Chemical Engineering DIBAKARBHATTACHARYYA, Research Engineer Department of Civil Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois INTRODUCTION Continuous foam separation has a great deal of potential as a sanitary engineering separation technique; it has been used successfully in a number or waste treatment applications. Rubin (1,2) and Eldib (3) have reported on the foam separation of alkyl benzene sulfonate and of organics analyzed as chemical oxygen demand from secondary sewage effluents. Tertiary treatment by foaming provides a method for the concentration of organics which are difficult to decompose biologically; the concentrated foam may then be recycled and combined with the influent to the secondary process. The removal of radioactive metal ions from waste streams by the use of foaming agents has been investigated by Schoen (4,5), Schnepf (6), and Schonfeld (7). These applications involve rather dilute solutions; in addition, the process may be applied to wastes containing higher concentrations of surface-active agents, including the direct treatment of laundry wastes. Grieves and Wood (8) have proposed foaming for the removal of specific surfactants from industrial wastes, in particular from refining and petrochemical wastes. Eldib (9) has successfully foam separated phenol from refining wastes. Foam separation employs the tendency of unsymmetrical organic molecules to accumulate at an interface between a gas phase and the aqueous solution phase. Foam provides the means for the efficient generation and collection of gas-liquid interfaces. Several excellent reviews of the process have been compiled (9,10, 11). A schematic diagram of a foaming column is presented in Figure 1. The process is continuous with a steady liquid feed of rate, L ml/min and composition, xLmg/ml and with a gas rate, G ml/min. The steady rates of the effluent streams are F (collapsed foam) and B (bulk), of composition yc and xg, respectively. A list is presented of the significant independent variables controlling the process, and wherever possible, the corresponding designations are made on the diagram. The dependent variables, xn and F, are to be minimized for maximum efficiency: it is desirable to reduce the concentration of surfactant in the bulk stream to a minimum, at the same time providing a concentrated foam stream of low flow rate. Once the response of xg andF to changes in the independent variables is determined, yp and B may be calculated from the overall and component material balances. Although foam separation has been the subject of considerable study, little effort has peen devoted to understanding the fundamentals of the continuous, steady-state process, particularly including a quantization of the effect of each of the numerous independent variables. Some preliminary work has been done by Grieves, et al. (12,13,14,15) on the influence of Xl« L, G, t, Hp, and Hg upon the foaming of aqueous surfactant solutions; however, most of the conclusions have been qualitative. The overall objective of the present study is the development of a model describing the foam separation process: starting with basic 965 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 965