page 508 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Methane Fermentation A. M. BUSWELL, Consultant Gainesville, Florida INTRODUCTION Anaerobic digestion as applied to waste treatment appears to date from the Austin tank described by Metcalf (1) as first constructed in 1857. About the same time (1860) Louis H. Mouras, a French engineer, built the "Mouras automatic scavenger." Liquification of organic solids was the recognized effect of the action in these tanks and this was early attributed to anaerobic organisms by bacteriologists of the time. Separation of sedimentation and digestion by means of two story tanks was the next development. The Travis tank in England and the Imhoff tank built in Germany about 1907 were the most successful examples. The Imhoff tank found wide use in the U. S. largely because of its suitability to the hot summer climate. The baffled separation of the lower or digestion compartments aided in keeping septic liquor from mixing with the effluent. By the early 1920's the separate digestion tank began to rise in favor. The cost of the separate structure was found to be justified by the improved operation control which was possible, especially when provided with Downs floating covers. In the meantime, Imhoff and co-workers in Germany, and O'Schaugnessy in England had developed much of the basic chemistry and bacteriology required for starting and operating anaerobic sludge digestion in either two story or separate tanks. The importance of thorough mixing of a considerable amount of well digested sludge with the incoming raw sludge for inoculation was well known and loading limits in terms of weight per volume per time unit had been worked out empirically to give practical operating conditions. Chemically it was known that most organic substances found in domestic sewage were readily susceptible to anaerobic fermentation, lignin and hydrocarbons being the principal exceptions. The chemical course of the process was supposed to involve a series of hy- drolytic reactions resulting in the production of organic acids which were later converted to CH4 and CO2 with some Ho. The varying amounts of N2 were assumed to be present in the raw sewage as dissolved air. Organic or proteinaceous N2 was hydrolyzed to NH3. The fact that a considerable amount of the organic matter was completely removed as gas, not known to Austin and Mouras, was an attractive characteristic of the process. In the digestion the complex gelatinous substances lost almost completely their water binding properties so that when drawn they drained rapidly and dried to a granular consistency. Odorous compounds were greatly reduced in amount and dissolved in the liquor so that the drained sludge had an inoffensive earthy odor and when rewetted did not imbibe water nor become slimy nor odorous. The lower fatty acids were early observed in the liquor and were found to include acetic, propionic, and butyric acids, acetic being in preponderance. Naturally these acids, especially acetic, were considered to be the precursors of CH4 and CO2. The fermentation was considered as occurring in two stages; the primary stage or acid stage, and the secondary or methane stage, sometimes called the alkaline stage. The alkaline phase was so called from the fact that the conversion of acetic acid (CH3COOH) to methane and carbon dioxide (CH4 508 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196443 |
Title | Methane fermentation |
Author | Buswell, Arthur M. (Arthur Moses), 1888- |
Date of Original | 1964 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the nineteenth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,11114 |
Extent of Original | p. 508-517 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 117 Engineering bulletin v. 49, no. 1(a)-2 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-19 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 508 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Methane Fermentation A. M. BUSWELL, Consultant Gainesville, Florida INTRODUCTION Anaerobic digestion as applied to waste treatment appears to date from the Austin tank described by Metcalf (1) as first constructed in 1857. About the same time (1860) Louis H. Mouras, a French engineer, built the "Mouras automatic scavenger." Liquification of organic solids was the recognized effect of the action in these tanks and this was early attributed to anaerobic organisms by bacteriologists of the time. Separation of sedimentation and digestion by means of two story tanks was the next development. The Travis tank in England and the Imhoff tank built in Germany about 1907 were the most successful examples. The Imhoff tank found wide use in the U. S. largely because of its suitability to the hot summer climate. The baffled separation of the lower or digestion compartments aided in keeping septic liquor from mixing with the effluent. By the early 1920's the separate digestion tank began to rise in favor. The cost of the separate structure was found to be justified by the improved operation control which was possible, especially when provided with Downs floating covers. In the meantime, Imhoff and co-workers in Germany, and O'Schaugnessy in England had developed much of the basic chemistry and bacteriology required for starting and operating anaerobic sludge digestion in either two story or separate tanks. The importance of thorough mixing of a considerable amount of well digested sludge with the incoming raw sludge for inoculation was well known and loading limits in terms of weight per volume per time unit had been worked out empirically to give practical operating conditions. Chemically it was known that most organic substances found in domestic sewage were readily susceptible to anaerobic fermentation, lignin and hydrocarbons being the principal exceptions. The chemical course of the process was supposed to involve a series of hy- drolytic reactions resulting in the production of organic acids which were later converted to CH4 and CO2 with some Ho. The varying amounts of N2 were assumed to be present in the raw sewage as dissolved air. Organic or proteinaceous N2 was hydrolyzed to NH3. The fact that a considerable amount of the organic matter was completely removed as gas, not known to Austin and Mouras, was an attractive characteristic of the process. In the digestion the complex gelatinous substances lost almost completely their water binding properties so that when drawn they drained rapidly and dried to a granular consistency. Odorous compounds were greatly reduced in amount and dissolved in the liquor so that the drained sludge had an inoffensive earthy odor and when rewetted did not imbibe water nor become slimy nor odorous. The lower fatty acids were early observed in the liquor and were found to include acetic, propionic, and butyric acids, acetic being in preponderance. Naturally these acids, especially acetic, were considered to be the precursors of CH4 and CO2. The fermentation was considered as occurring in two stages; the primary stage or acid stage, and the secondary or methane stage, sometimes called the alkaline stage. The alkaline phase was so called from the fact that the conversion of acetic acid (CH3COOH) to methane and carbon dioxide (CH4 508 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 508