page 413 |
Previous | 1 of 5 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Industrial Wastes from Scouring Rug Wools and the Removal of Dieldrin ROBERT D. WILROY, Project Engineer Wiedeman and Singleton, Engineers Atlanta, Georgia At the present time in the United States there is a tremendous movement of industry from one area of the country to another. There are many factors which control these movements such as favorable labor supply, transportation, markets, availability of raw materials, and an adequate water supply. Another factor which has become more important is a means of disposal of the industrial wastes from the industrial plant. Many industries consider all of the other factors in their economic evaluation of the proposed site and ignore the industrial waste problem until the plant is under construction or in the final design stage. It then becomes a very critical problem to find some method of disposal of the industrial waste. Generally, only when a careful consideration of the industrial waste has been given ahead of the initial design stage, or actual plant location, is it possible to find an economical method for disposal of the industrial waste. The purpose of this paper is to present the factors which affected the location of one industry and the method used on a difficult and hard to treat industrial waste. During the spring of 1961, a rug manufacturer was looking for a new site to locate a wool scouring and yarn mill. The manufacturer was attempting to locate in the Southeastern United States. There were several factors which required special consideration in the disposal of the waste from this mill. The trade journals are full of articles on the treatment and problems from the scouring of wool, but little is mentioned about the wide variations in the types of wools themselves. In the manufacture of woolen rugs, the wool that is used has a low initial grease content when compared with the wool used for blankets and sweaters. A measure of the grease content is generally compared in the wool industry based on the shrinkage that is found during scouring. The shrinkage or loss of weight during scouring for rug wools varies between 15 and 25 per cent. This is fairly low when compared to the shrinkage on blanket and sweater wools which is as high as 45 to 50 per cent. The actual grease content for rug wools will vary between two and five per cent. There are other differences in the wool besides the low grease content. The coarse heavy wool used for weaving of rugs has a high grit content and high inorganic suspended solids content. This material accounts for a large part ofthe total shrinkage. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS With reference to the specific mill in question, Dr. C.N. Sawyer of Met- calf and Eddy, Engineers, made a detailed investigation of the pollutional load from the process to be designed. Based on scouring approximately 50,000 lbs of rug wool per day, it was estimated that with a five per cent grease content and a 26 per cent shrinkage value, that the waste effluent would contain 2,400 lbs of grease, 4,200 lbs of suspended solids and 2,250 lbs of five-day BOD. The population equivalent based on BOD would be approximately 14,400 people. It was estimated that 60,000 gals/day of water would be used in the nonionic detergent scouring process. In addition to the wool scouring waste, it was also estimated - 413 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196338 |
Title | Industrial wastes from scouring rug wools and the removal of dieldrin |
Author | Wilroy, Robert D. |
Date of Original | 1963 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the eighteenth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=10285&REC=1 |
Extent of Original | p. 413-417 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-18 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 413 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Industrial Wastes from Scouring Rug Wools and the Removal of Dieldrin ROBERT D. WILROY, Project Engineer Wiedeman and Singleton, Engineers Atlanta, Georgia At the present time in the United States there is a tremendous movement of industry from one area of the country to another. There are many factors which control these movements such as favorable labor supply, transportation, markets, availability of raw materials, and an adequate water supply. Another factor which has become more important is a means of disposal of the industrial wastes from the industrial plant. Many industries consider all of the other factors in their economic evaluation of the proposed site and ignore the industrial waste problem until the plant is under construction or in the final design stage. It then becomes a very critical problem to find some method of disposal of the industrial waste. Generally, only when a careful consideration of the industrial waste has been given ahead of the initial design stage, or actual plant location, is it possible to find an economical method for disposal of the industrial waste. The purpose of this paper is to present the factors which affected the location of one industry and the method used on a difficult and hard to treat industrial waste. During the spring of 1961, a rug manufacturer was looking for a new site to locate a wool scouring and yarn mill. The manufacturer was attempting to locate in the Southeastern United States. There were several factors which required special consideration in the disposal of the waste from this mill. The trade journals are full of articles on the treatment and problems from the scouring of wool, but little is mentioned about the wide variations in the types of wools themselves. In the manufacture of woolen rugs, the wool that is used has a low initial grease content when compared with the wool used for blankets and sweaters. A measure of the grease content is generally compared in the wool industry based on the shrinkage that is found during scouring. The shrinkage or loss of weight during scouring for rug wools varies between 15 and 25 per cent. This is fairly low when compared to the shrinkage on blanket and sweater wools which is as high as 45 to 50 per cent. The actual grease content for rug wools will vary between two and five per cent. There are other differences in the wool besides the low grease content. The coarse heavy wool used for weaving of rugs has a high grit content and high inorganic suspended solids content. This material accounts for a large part ofthe total shrinkage. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS With reference to the specific mill in question, Dr. C.N. Sawyer of Met- calf and Eddy, Engineers, made a detailed investigation of the pollutional load from the process to be designed. Based on scouring approximately 50,000 lbs of rug wool per day, it was estimated that with a five per cent grease content and a 26 per cent shrinkage value, that the waste effluent would contain 2,400 lbs of grease, 4,200 lbs of suspended solids and 2,250 lbs of five-day BOD. The population equivalent based on BOD would be approximately 14,400 people. It was estimated that 60,000 gals/day of water would be used in the nonionic detergent scouring process. In addition to the wool scouring waste, it was also estimated - 413 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 413