Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 25, 1953) |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing INFORMATION FOR INDIANA FARMERS Lafayette, Indiana February 25, 1953 Prepared by members of the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University When Should I Sell My Hogs? by M. R. JANSSEN, Agricultural Economics and Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S. D. A. IF YOU ARE one of In- I diana's many hog producers, several times each year you are faced with the question: Should I sell my hogs now, or would I make more money by feeding them longer and selling them at a heavier weight? You can find an answer to this question by estimating the change in value of your hogs and comparing it with the added cost of holding them for a given period. You can compute the change in value of a hog by applying seasonal prices to successive weights. Added feed costs can be computed by applying prevailing prices to the quantities of the various feeds necessary to produce the additional gain. If the additional return from keeping a hog until it has gained another 25 pounds is greater than the additional feed cost, then it is profitable to hold the hog to the heavier weight, provided the difference in additional net returns is enough to cover the added work, costs of equipment and risk involved. Thus, to find his answer, the hog producer is concerned chiefly with (1) the level of hog prices, (2) the seasonal pattern of hog prices, including the difference in the seasonal pattern among various weights, and (3) the cost of producing additional gains for different size hogs under varying conditions. The purpose of this article is to bring together certain information that will help you in making the computations mentioned above, and to illustrate their u*e for a selected situation. Seasonal Price Changes Prices of hogs tend to vary throughout the year ln a seasonal pattern. In addition, various market weights have different patterns. The average seasonal price relationships for the different weight classes shown in Table 1 are based upon findings in several studies made at Purdue University of hog prices from 1946-50. The seasonal pattern is adjusted to a base level of $17.57, which was the average price per hundredweight for 200 to 220 pound barrows and gilts at Indianapolis in December, 1952. A number of factors may cause the actual price in any particular year to deviate from the normal seasonal pattern. For example, seasonal prices often are affected differently during different phases of the hog cycle, or the seasonal pattern in hog prices may be modified by changes in the general level of prices. Price discounts for heavy hogs are particularly sensitive to changes in the lard situation. Hence, in any season, the changes in value may be somewhat greater or smaller than indicated by the computed seasonal prices in Table 1. Adjustments can be made in Table 1 to conform to your outlook for hog prices. Taking an example using prices in Table 1, a hog weighing 225 pounds on February 14 would sell for $18.90 per hundredweight, bringing a total of $42.53. The same hog fed to 250 pounds by February 28 would sell for $17.72 per hundredweight, or a total of $44.30. Although the gain of 25 pounds would be worth $4.48, the increase in the total value of the hog would be only $1.77 because of the seasonal decline in the price per hundredweight between February 14 and February 28. Costs of Additional Gain Feed represents about 80 percent of the total cost
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 25, 1953) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195302 |
Date of Original | 1953 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 02/27/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ195302.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 25, 1953) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195302 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing INFORMATION FOR INDIANA FARMERS Lafayette, Indiana February 25, 1953 Prepared by members of the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University When Should I Sell My Hogs? by M. R. JANSSEN, Agricultural Economics and Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S. D. A. IF YOU ARE one of In- I diana's many hog producers, several times each year you are faced with the question: Should I sell my hogs now, or would I make more money by feeding them longer and selling them at a heavier weight? You can find an answer to this question by estimating the change in value of your hogs and comparing it with the added cost of holding them for a given period. You can compute the change in value of a hog by applying seasonal prices to successive weights. Added feed costs can be computed by applying prevailing prices to the quantities of the various feeds necessary to produce the additional gain. If the additional return from keeping a hog until it has gained another 25 pounds is greater than the additional feed cost, then it is profitable to hold the hog to the heavier weight, provided the difference in additional net returns is enough to cover the added work, costs of equipment and risk involved. Thus, to find his answer, the hog producer is concerned chiefly with (1) the level of hog prices, (2) the seasonal pattern of hog prices, including the difference in the seasonal pattern among various weights, and (3) the cost of producing additional gains for different size hogs under varying conditions. The purpose of this article is to bring together certain information that will help you in making the computations mentioned above, and to illustrate their u*e for a selected situation. Seasonal Price Changes Prices of hogs tend to vary throughout the year ln a seasonal pattern. In addition, various market weights have different patterns. The average seasonal price relationships for the different weight classes shown in Table 1 are based upon findings in several studies made at Purdue University of hog prices from 1946-50. The seasonal pattern is adjusted to a base level of $17.57, which was the average price per hundredweight for 200 to 220 pound barrows and gilts at Indianapolis in December, 1952. A number of factors may cause the actual price in any particular year to deviate from the normal seasonal pattern. For example, seasonal prices often are affected differently during different phases of the hog cycle, or the seasonal pattern in hog prices may be modified by changes in the general level of prices. Price discounts for heavy hogs are particularly sensitive to changes in the lard situation. Hence, in any season, the changes in value may be somewhat greater or smaller than indicated by the computed seasonal prices in Table 1. Adjustments can be made in Table 1 to conform to your outlook for hog prices. Taking an example using prices in Table 1, a hog weighing 225 pounds on February 14 would sell for $18.90 per hundredweight, bringing a total of $42.53. The same hog fed to 250 pounds by February 28 would sell for $17.72 per hundredweight, or a total of $44.30. Although the gain of 25 pounds would be worth $4.48, the increase in the total value of the hog would be only $1.77 because of the seasonal decline in the price per hundredweight between February 14 and February 28. Costs of Additional Gain Feed represents about 80 percent of the total cost |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 25, 1953)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 25, 1953)