Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Oct. 31, 1969) |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana October 31, 1969 For Commercial Agriculture ALTERNATIVE COORDINATION POLICIES by Paul L. Farris, Agricultural Economics It has become clear in recent years that problems of commercial agriculture are different than problems of low income farmers who have inadequate land and capital. Within the commercial sector, two further distinctions are appearing: (1) Matching over-all supply and demand so that farm people realize satisfactory prices and incomes; and (2) Guiding the course of organization and competition within agriculture and between agriculture and nonfarm sectors. Our concern here is with these organizational issues. A shift of managerial functions out of the hands of farmers would fundamentally change the organization of agriculture in ways not fully visible from declining farm numbers and increasing farm sizes. Change in organization also has implications beyond agriculture. The family farm has been warmly praised for its contribution to morality and democracy in American society. However, the most forceful argument for strengthening the family farm, defined not only in terms of the relative amount of family labor employed but particularly to include a reasonable degree of managerial independence, is to support decentralized decision-making and diffused economic power in agricultural organization. The social benefits, which come naturally from a structure in which buyers and sellers are sufficiently numerous and vigorous to provide for competitive checks and balances at all stages in production and marketing systems, are generally well known. On the other hand, both economic theory and historical experience raise some questions about the possible effects of concentrated power and of certain organizational tendencies in agriculture on farmers, farm communities, and society. With regard to efficiency, in most circumstances it is not clear that alternative systems of production would be more efficient than family farm agriculture. While many farms are too small to achieve low unit costs of production, neither great size nor particular types of integrated structures seem necessary for efficiency or progress. Significant Aspects of the Modern Food and Fiber Economy To analyze organizational alternatives, five fundamental characteristics of the modern food and fiber economy must be taken into account: (1) Gains from Coordination Economic and technological forces are bringing strong pressures to integrate, in one way or another, the functions and processes involved in turning out goods and services for the consuming market. Closer coordination makes more exacting demands on all participants in vertically organized systems and moves decision-making toward one point in the channel, which, in turn, tends to become the single profit center. (2) Size and Organization of Firms with whom Farmers Deal The difference between the industrial organization — that is, size, concentration, integration and diversification — of nonfarm firms who deal with farmers and that of farmers is often of critical significance. Suppliers and processors may have a substantially wider range of behavioral options open to them than are available to farmers. (3) Market Orientation The modern selling environment in the U.S. is one in which most consumers are busy and have incomes that will buy more than bare necessities for life. Highly processed and conveniently packaged items find increasing acceptance. This setting lends itself to the management of demand by manufacturers and distributors. They are in an advantageous position to anticipate broad changes in consumption patterns, to develop particular products which will fit into general trends in life styles, then to assure that people buy what they produce by using modern advertising and promotion techniques. The phenomenon is of growing importance in the food industry. (4) The Farm as a Producer of Raw Material The undifferentiated raw materials which farmers turn out, to
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Oct. 31, 1969) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196910 |
Date of Original | 1969 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 05/01/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ196910.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Oct. 31, 1969) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196910 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana October 31, 1969 For Commercial Agriculture ALTERNATIVE COORDINATION POLICIES by Paul L. Farris, Agricultural Economics It has become clear in recent years that problems of commercial agriculture are different than problems of low income farmers who have inadequate land and capital. Within the commercial sector, two further distinctions are appearing: (1) Matching over-all supply and demand so that farm people realize satisfactory prices and incomes; and (2) Guiding the course of organization and competition within agriculture and between agriculture and nonfarm sectors. Our concern here is with these organizational issues. A shift of managerial functions out of the hands of farmers would fundamentally change the organization of agriculture in ways not fully visible from declining farm numbers and increasing farm sizes. Change in organization also has implications beyond agriculture. The family farm has been warmly praised for its contribution to morality and democracy in American society. However, the most forceful argument for strengthening the family farm, defined not only in terms of the relative amount of family labor employed but particularly to include a reasonable degree of managerial independence, is to support decentralized decision-making and diffused economic power in agricultural organization. The social benefits, which come naturally from a structure in which buyers and sellers are sufficiently numerous and vigorous to provide for competitive checks and balances at all stages in production and marketing systems, are generally well known. On the other hand, both economic theory and historical experience raise some questions about the possible effects of concentrated power and of certain organizational tendencies in agriculture on farmers, farm communities, and society. With regard to efficiency, in most circumstances it is not clear that alternative systems of production would be more efficient than family farm agriculture. While many farms are too small to achieve low unit costs of production, neither great size nor particular types of integrated structures seem necessary for efficiency or progress. Significant Aspects of the Modern Food and Fiber Economy To analyze organizational alternatives, five fundamental characteristics of the modern food and fiber economy must be taken into account: (1) Gains from Coordination Economic and technological forces are bringing strong pressures to integrate, in one way or another, the functions and processes involved in turning out goods and services for the consuming market. Closer coordination makes more exacting demands on all participants in vertically organized systems and moves decision-making toward one point in the channel, which, in turn, tends to become the single profit center. (2) Size and Organization of Firms with whom Farmers Deal The difference between the industrial organization — that is, size, concentration, integration and diversification — of nonfarm firms who deal with farmers and that of farmers is often of critical significance. Suppliers and processors may have a substantially wider range of behavioral options open to them than are available to farmers. (3) Market Orientation The modern selling environment in the U.S. is one in which most consumers are busy and have incomes that will buy more than bare necessities for life. Highly processed and conveniently packaged items find increasing acceptance. This setting lends itself to the management of demand by manufacturers and distributors. They are in an advantageous position to anticipate broad changes in consumption patterns, to develop particular products which will fit into general trends in life styles, then to assure that people buy what they produce by using modern advertising and promotion techniques. The phenomenon is of growing importance in the food industry. (4) The Farm as a Producer of Raw Material The undifferentiated raw materials which farmers turn out, to |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Oct. 31, 1969)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Oct. 31, 1969)