Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jan. 30, 1970) |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana January 30, 1970 THE 1970 FEED GRAIN PROGRAM Paul R. Robbins, Agricultural Economics J.rIE 1970 FEED GRAIN PROGRAM is very similar TO THE ONE FOR 1969. PRICE SUPPORT LOAN RATES ARE unchanged; HOWEVER, CORN IS NOW QUOTED ON "no. 2" basis. Price support payment rates are unchanged. Diversion payments will be slightly reduced. Signup will be conducted February 2 through March 20. Budgeting Your Farm Situation Should you participate in the 1970 Feed Grain Pro- ram and if so, at what level? What payments could you receive? What costs can be saved if you participate? Some of your costs are already fixed for 1970. Taxes and interest on land as well as depreciation, interest, taxes and insurance on machinery and equipment will likely be influenced very little if at all, by your decision regarding the feed grain program. However, if because of a larger acreage of corn (non-participation) , it is necessary to buy added equipment, then fixed machinery and equipment costs would be increased and become an important factor in your decision regarding participation in 1970. Costs for items such as seed, fertilizer, chemicals, tractor fuel and equipment repairs are variable and would be reduced by participation. Labor can be either a fixed or variable cost depending upon the particular situation. In the budgets that follow, labor is considered a variable cost since it is often in short supply particularly during the corn planting and harvest periods, and many Indiana farmers have alternative uses for any labor that might be saved through participation. EXAMPLE: Bill Smith farms 400 tillable acres, all suitable for continuous row crop production. He has a feed grain base of 250 acres. His farm has no conserving acreage base, no wheat base and no wheat planted. The farm's established yield on which payments are based is 100 bushels per acre. If Smith does not par- cipate in the 1970 feed grain program he plans to raise * Assistance in interpretation of details of the program Provided by program specialists of the State ASC Office 300 acres of corn and 100 acres of soybeans. With these acreages of corn and soybeans his expected yields are 100 bushels for corn and 33 bushels for soybeans. If Smith participates at the 20 per cent level, he would divert 50 acres and, due to more timely operations, he expects the corn yield on the remaining acreage to average 102 bushels. If he participates at the 50 per cent level, his average corn yield is expected to increase to 105 bushels. If Smith participates he will grow 150 acres of soybeans. Smith thinks that the price of No. 2 corn at harvest will be about $1.00 and soybeans about $2.25 per bushel. Smith computed his feed grain program payments at the minimum and maximum levels of participation: (See Table 1.) Table 1. Bill Smith's 1970 Feed Grain Program Payments at Minimum and Maximum Levels of Participation 1. Participation at minimum 20 per cent level: (a) Price support payment = 100 (farm's projected yield) x $.30 x acres ( Vz of base) bu. 125 (b) Total payment (same as 1-a price support payment only) Participation at 50 per cent level (may be any level of participation from 20-50 per cent) : (a) Price support payment (same as computed in 1-a above (b) Diversion payment = 40% x $1.38 (national average loan and support payment for No. 2 corn) x 100 bu. (farm's projected yield) x 75 acres (additional acres diverted above minimum 20%) (c) Total program payment at 50% level of participation (2-a -f- 2-b) = $3750 = $3750 = 3750 : 4140 $7890 was Next Smith turned to Table 3 to determine the income above variable costs per acre for the crops he would be growing (corn and soybeans) and at yield
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jan. 30, 1970) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ197001 |
Date of Original | 1970 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 05/01/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ197001.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jan. 30, 1970) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ197001 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana January 30, 1970 THE 1970 FEED GRAIN PROGRAM Paul R. Robbins, Agricultural Economics J.rIE 1970 FEED GRAIN PROGRAM is very similar TO THE ONE FOR 1969. PRICE SUPPORT LOAN RATES ARE unchanged; HOWEVER, CORN IS NOW QUOTED ON "no. 2" basis. Price support payment rates are unchanged. Diversion payments will be slightly reduced. Signup will be conducted February 2 through March 20. Budgeting Your Farm Situation Should you participate in the 1970 Feed Grain Pro- ram and if so, at what level? What payments could you receive? What costs can be saved if you participate? Some of your costs are already fixed for 1970. Taxes and interest on land as well as depreciation, interest, taxes and insurance on machinery and equipment will likely be influenced very little if at all, by your decision regarding the feed grain program. However, if because of a larger acreage of corn (non-participation) , it is necessary to buy added equipment, then fixed machinery and equipment costs would be increased and become an important factor in your decision regarding participation in 1970. Costs for items such as seed, fertilizer, chemicals, tractor fuel and equipment repairs are variable and would be reduced by participation. Labor can be either a fixed or variable cost depending upon the particular situation. In the budgets that follow, labor is considered a variable cost since it is often in short supply particularly during the corn planting and harvest periods, and many Indiana farmers have alternative uses for any labor that might be saved through participation. EXAMPLE: Bill Smith farms 400 tillable acres, all suitable for continuous row crop production. He has a feed grain base of 250 acres. His farm has no conserving acreage base, no wheat base and no wheat planted. The farm's established yield on which payments are based is 100 bushels per acre. If Smith does not par- cipate in the 1970 feed grain program he plans to raise * Assistance in interpretation of details of the program Provided by program specialists of the State ASC Office 300 acres of corn and 100 acres of soybeans. With these acreages of corn and soybeans his expected yields are 100 bushels for corn and 33 bushels for soybeans. If Smith participates at the 20 per cent level, he would divert 50 acres and, due to more timely operations, he expects the corn yield on the remaining acreage to average 102 bushels. If he participates at the 50 per cent level, his average corn yield is expected to increase to 105 bushels. If Smith participates he will grow 150 acres of soybeans. Smith thinks that the price of No. 2 corn at harvest will be about $1.00 and soybeans about $2.25 per bushel. Smith computed his feed grain program payments at the minimum and maximum levels of participation: (See Table 1.) Table 1. Bill Smith's 1970 Feed Grain Program Payments at Minimum and Maximum Levels of Participation 1. Participation at minimum 20 per cent level: (a) Price support payment = 100 (farm's projected yield) x $.30 x acres ( Vz of base) bu. 125 (b) Total payment (same as 1-a price support payment only) Participation at 50 per cent level (may be any level of participation from 20-50 per cent) : (a) Price support payment (same as computed in 1-a above (b) Diversion payment = 40% x $1.38 (national average loan and support payment for No. 2 corn) x 100 bu. (farm's projected yield) x 75 acres (additional acres diverted above minimum 20%) (c) Total program payment at 50% level of participation (2-a -f- 2-b) = $3750 = $3750 = 3750 : 4140 $7890 was Next Smith turned to Table 3 to determine the income above variable costs per acre for the crops he would be growing (corn and soybeans) and at yield |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jan. 30, 1970)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jan. 30, 1970)